Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T06:38:43.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 - Social Networks and Personal Relationships

from Part IX - Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2018

Anita L. Vangelisti
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Daniel Perlman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Get access

Summary

Adopting a social network perspective entails acknowledging the interpersonal context within which close relationships develop. The present chapter covers the recent surge in social network research, and highlights the influence that our friends, families, and acquaintances – both online and offline – have on the initiation, maintenance, and deterioration of romantic relationships and friendships. We begin with coverage of fundamental terminology and theory, and then move to a discussion of evidence supporting the integral role of network members in fostering and nurturing our connections with others. We also address how social network influence can have a dark side (e.g., maintaining toxic relationships, sabotaging existing unions). On a general level, the work reviewed provides overwhelming evidence of “the social network effect,” that is, the power of social networks in shaping social relations. Interpersonal networks provide the support, information, opportunities, and structural embeddedness that often facilitate the initiation and maintenance of personal relationships and tend to impede their dissolution. We conclude with suggested future directions regarding the intersection between social network science and romantic and friendship ties. After all, in our increasingly global society, understanding the consequences of this broadening web of interconnections will become ever more important.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aartsen, M., Van Tilburg, T., Smits, C. H. M., & Knipscheer, K. C. R. M. (2004). A longitudinal study of the impact of physical and cognitive decline on the personal network in old age. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 249266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, J. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Cooperative courtships: Helping friends raise and raze relationship barriers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulleting, 35, 12851300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballantine, P. W., Lin, Y., & Veer, E. (2015). The influence of user comments on perceptions of Facebook relationship status updates. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 5055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, C., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2013). Competition, envy, or snobbism? How popularity and friendships shape antipathy networks of adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 586595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. F., Roberts, S. G. B., & Sutcliffe, A. G. (2012). Closeness, loneliness, support: Core ties and significant ties in personal communities. Social Networks, 34, 206214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boda, Z., & Neray, B. (2015) Inter-ethnic friendship and negative ties in secondary school. Social Networks, 43, 5772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, L., Fitzpatrick, J., Crawford, D., & Fischer, J. (2001). The role of network support and interference in women’s perception of romantic, friends, and parental relationships. Sex Roles, 45, 481499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castanada, A. M., Wendel, M. L., & Crockett, E. E. (2015). Overlap in Facebook profiles reflects relationship closeness. Journal of Social Psychology, 155, 395401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalina, L. T., & Choi, M. (2015). The couple who Facebooks together, stays together: Facebook self-presentation and relational longevity among college-aged dating couples. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 18, 367372.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, S. E. (2007). The social construction of romantic relationships in adolescence: Examining the role of peer networks, gender, and race. Sociological Inquiry, 77, 572600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S., & Chan, C. (2007). Perceptions of commitment change during mate selection: The case of Taiwanese newlyweds. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York, NY: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 556577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark-Ibanez, M., & Felmlee, D. (2004). Interethnic relationships: The role of social network diversity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 293305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterell, J. (2007). Social networks in youth and adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2010). The dark side of personal relationships II. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Klepper, M., Sleebos, E., Van de Bunt, G., & Agneessens, F. (2010). Similarity in friendship networks: Selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Social Networks, 32, 8290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doroud, M., Bhattacharyya, P., Wu, S. F., & Felmlee, D. (2011). The evolution of ego-centric triads: A microscopic approach toward predicting macroscopic network properties. 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), 172179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouin, M., Miller, D. A., & Dibble, J. L. (2014). Ignore your partners’ current Facebook friends: Beware the ones they add! Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 483488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Due, P., Holstein, B., Lund, R., Modvig, J., & Avlund, K. (1999). Social relations: Network support and relational strain. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 661673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Co-evolution of neocortex size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M., & Machin, A. J. (2014). Sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 109133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 14, 631635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etcheverry, P. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2004). Subjective norms and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Personal Relationships, 11, 409428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etcheverry, P., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. (2013). Predictors of friend approval for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 20, 6983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76, 4873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2014). Casualties of social combat: School networks of peer victimization and their consequences. American Sociological Review, 79, 228257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiring, C. (1999). Other-sex friendship networks and the development of romantic relationships in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 495512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D. (2001). No couple is an island: A social stability network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces, 79, 12591287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D., & Faris, R. (2013). Interaction in social networks. In Delamater, J. & Ward, A. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology (2nd edn., pp. 389409). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Felmlee, D., & Faris, R. (2016). Toxic ties: Networks of friendship, dating, and cybervictimization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79, 243262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Close relationships and social psychology: Intersections and future paths. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 365376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D., Sweet, E., & Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Gender rules: Same- and cross-gender friendship norms. Sex Roles, 66, 518529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Norton, M. I., Reis, H. T., Ariely, D., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., & Maniaci, M. R. (2015). When does familiarity promote versus undermine interpersonal attraction? A proposed integrative model from erstwhile adversaries. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, C. S. (2009). The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact?. American Sociological Review, 74, 657669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (2011). Still connected: Family and friends in America since 1970. New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Flynn, H. K., Felmlee, D. H., & Conger, R. (2014). The social context of adolescent friendships: Parents, peers, and romantic partners. Youth and Society, 46, 127.Google Scholar
Fox, J., & Anderegg, C. (2014). Romantic relationship stages and social networking sites: Uncertainty reduction strategies and perceived relational norms on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 17, 685691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girard, Y., Hett, F., & Schunk, D. (2015). How individual characteristics shape the structure of social networks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 197216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 13601380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, G., & Deal, K. H. (2012). Two plus two: Couples and their couple friendships. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallinan, M. T., & Kubitschek, W. (1990). The formation of intransitive friendships. Social Forces, 69, 505519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., & Van Dongen, K. (2015). Friendship network centrality and the performance of soccer players: The role of cognitive accuracy. Human Performance, 28, 265279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, D. L., Doogan, N. J., & Soller, B. (2014). Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: A dynamic network approach. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 52, 688722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). What makes you click? – Mate preferences in online dating. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8, 393427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogerbrugge, M. J. A., Komter, A. E., & Scheepers, P. (2013). Dissolving long-term romantic relationships: Assessing the role of social context. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 320342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, G. C., Soto, D., Fujimoto, K., Valente, T. W. (2014). The interplay of friendship networks and social networking sites: Longitudinal analysis of selection and influence effects on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 5159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huston, T. L., & Levinger, G. (1978). Interpersonal attraction and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 115156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, J. F., & Rauer, A. J. (2014). Turning inward versus outward: Relationship work in young adults and romantic functioning. Personal Relationships, 21, 451467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. P., & Leslie, L. (1982). Couple involvement and network structure: A test of the dyadic withdrawal hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 3443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, D., Markman, H. J., Leveille, S., Chartrand, E., & Begin, J. (1994). Networks’ support and interference with regard to marriage: Disclosures of marital problems to confidants. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, D., Tremblay, N., Belanger, I., Dube, M., Begin, J., & Bouthillier, D. (2000). Interaction structure of husbands’ and wives’ disclosure of marital conflict to the respective best friend. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 286303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmijn, M. & Flap, H. (2001). Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social Forces, 79, 12891312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, J. N., & Leonard, K. E. (2004). Social networks, structural interdependence, and marital quality over the transition to marriage: A prospective analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 383395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keneski, E., & Loving, T. J. (2014). Network perceptions of daters’ romances. In Agnew, C. R. (ed.) Social influences on close relationships: Beyond the dyad (pp. 126147). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. J., & Stiff, J. B. (1991). Social networks and the development of close relationships. Human Communication Research, 18, 7091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreager, D. A., Cavanagh, S. A., Yen, J., & Yu, M. (2014). Where have all the good men gone? Gendered interactions in online dating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 387410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ledbetter, A. M. (2010). Content- and medium-specific decomposition of friendship relational maintenance: Integrating equity and media multiplexity approaches. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 938955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmiller, J. J., & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Marginalized relationships: The impact of social disapproval on romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 4051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, L. A., Huston, T. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1986). Parental reactions to dating relationships: Do they make a difference? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 5766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, D. S., Taylor, R. J., Nguyen, A. W., Chatters, L. M., & Himle, J. A. (2015). Family and friendship informal support networks and social anxiety disorder among African Americans and Black Caribbeans. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50, 11211133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, K. (2013). The limits of racial prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 18814–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, J. H., Campbell, S. M., & Condie, H. (1995). Ethnocentrism in dating preferences for an American sample: The ingroup bias in social context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 95115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting dating relationship fate with insiders’ and outsiders’ perspectives: Who and what is asked matters. Personal Relationships, 13, 349362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, R. (2011). The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. Statistics, Politics, and Policy, 2(1): Article 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGeorge, E. L., & Hall, D. E. (2014). Relationship advice. In Agnew, C. R. (ed.), Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad (pp. 188208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, W. D., Cohen, J. A., & Smock, P. J. (2011). The role of romantic partners, family, and peer networks in dating couples’ views about cohabitation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26, 115149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConnell, E. A., Birkett, M., & Shattell, M. (2015). The future of big data: Innovative methodological approaches. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 36, 478480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDermott, R., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2013). Breaking up is hard to do, unless everyone else is doing it too: Social network effects on divorce in a longitudinal sample. Social Forces, 92, 491519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, D. A., Moody, J., Diehl, D., Smith, J. A., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). Network ecology and adolescent social structure. American Sociological Review, 79, 10881121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milardo, R. M. (1982). Friendship networks in developing relationships: Converging and diverging social environments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 162172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milardo, R. M., & Helms-Erikson, H. (2000). Network overlap and third-party influence in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (eds.) Close relationships: A handbook (pp. 3245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Milardo, R. M., Johnson, M. P., & Huston, T. L. (1983). Developing close relationships: Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 964976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murase, Y., Jo, H., Torok, J., Kertesz, J., & Kaski, K. (2015). Modeling the role of relationship fading and breakup in social network formation. PLoS ONE, 10, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niehuis, S. (2005). Alternative monitoring predictors: When the grass looks greener on the other side. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 419430.Google Scholar
O’Malley, J. (2013). The analysis of social network data: An exciting frontier for statisticians. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 539555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., & Ragan, D. T. (2015). Social networks and the diffusion of adolescent problem behavior: Reliable estimates of selection and influence from sixth through ninth grades. Prevention Science, 16, 832843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papapolydorou, M. (2014). “When you see a normal person … ”: Social class and friendship networks among teenage students. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35, 559577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papp, L. M., Danielewicz, J., & Cayemberg, C. (2012). “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners’ Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 15, 8590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paquin, R. L., & Howard-Grenville, J. (2013). Blind dates and arranged marriages: Longitudinal processes of network orchestration. Organization Studies, 34, 16231653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, P. D., Ciarrochi, J., Heaven, P., Marshall, S., Sahdra, B., & Kiuru, N. (2015). Hope, friends, subjective well-being: A social network approach to peer group contextual effects. Child Development, 86, 642650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal relationships and personal networks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 10, 5579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, P., & Moody, J. (2003). Structure and sentiment: Explaining emotional attachment to groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 3447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petronio, S. & Endes, T. (1985). Dating and the single-parent: Communicating in the social network. Journal of Divorce, 9, 83105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Place, S. S. (2011). Non-independent mate choice in humans: Deciphering and utilizing information in a social environment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71, 7113.Google Scholar
Porter, J. R., & Capellan, J. (2014). The ties that bind: Linking religious organizational segregation to the individual level closure of close friendship networks. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 4, 3244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). Relationships in human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, S. B. G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2015). Managing relationship decay: Network, gender and contextual effects. Human Nature, 26, 426450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77, 523547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, L., & Starks, T. J. (2015). Relationship stigma and relationship outcomes in interracial and same-sex relationships: Examination of sources and buffers. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rueda, H. A., Lindsay, M., & Williams, L. R. (2015). “She posted in on Facebook”: Mexican American adolescents’ experiences with technology and romantic relationship conflict. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 419445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanri, Ç., & Goodwin, R. (2013). Values and love styles in Turkey and Great Britain: An intercultural and intracultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 837845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sassler, S., & Miller, A. (2015). The ecology of relationships: The effect of meeting patterns on cohabiting couples’ relationship progression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 141160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sautter, J., Tippett, R. M., & Morgan, S. P. (2010). The social demography of Internet dating in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 554575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, D. R., Simpkins, S. D., Vest, A. E., & Price, C. D. (2011). The contribution of extracurricular activities to adolescent friendships: New insights through social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 47, 11411152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014). Friendship networks and achievement goals: An examination of selection and influence processes and variations by gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 14531464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, H. C., & Ellithorpe, C. N. (2014). The new story of Romeo and Juliet. In Agnew, C. R. (ed.) Social influences on close relationships: Beyond the dyad. (pp. 148170). London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, H. C., Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Wright, B. L. (2015). Don’t tell me who I can’t love: A multimethod investigation of social network and reactance effects on romantic relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 7799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, H., Hood, K. B., & Wright, B. L. (2014). Revisiting the Romeo and Juliet effect (Driscoll, Davis, & Lipetz, 1972): Reexamining the links between social network opinions and romantic relationship outcomes. Social Psychology, 45, 170178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatcher, R. B. (2010). When Harry and Sally met Dick and Jane: Creating closeness between couples. Personal Relationships, 17, 279297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soller, B. (2015). “I did not do it my way”: The peer context of inauthentic romantic relationships. Sociological Perspectives, 58, 337357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosik, V. S., & Bazarova, N. N. (2014). Relational maintenance on social network sites: How Facebook communication predicts relational escalation. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 124131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships: A three-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 888900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Romantic partners’ perceptions of social network attributes with the passage of time and relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The principle of least interest: Inequality in emotional involvement in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 12551280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadtfield, C. & Pentland, A. (2015). Partnership ties shape friendship networks: A dynamic social network study. Social Forces, 94, 453477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, T. H. (2015). Understanding the selection bias: Social network processes and the effect of prejudice on the avoidance of outgroup friends. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 127150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauder, J. (2014). Friendship networks and the social structure of opportunities for contact and interaction. Social Science Research, 48, 234250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, L. J., Fiore, S. T., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2011). “Out of my league”: A real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 942954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidwell, N. D., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20, 199215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zantvliet, P. I., & Kalmijn, M. (2013). Friendship networks and interethnic union formation: An analysis of immigrant children. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 953973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., & Wellman, B. (2010). Social connectivity in America: Changes in adult friendship network size from 2002 to 2007. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 11481169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welker, K. M., Baker, L., Padilla, A., Holmes, H., Aron, A., & Slatcher, R. B. (2014). Effects of self-disclosure and responsiveness between couples on passionate love within couples. Personal Relationships, 21, 692708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildermuth, S. M. (2004). The effects of stigmatizing discourse on the quality of on-line relationships. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 7384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, B. L. & Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Pulling the strings: Effects of parent and friends opinions on dating choices. Personal Relationships 19, 743748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. L., Sinclair, H. C., & Hood, K. B. (2014). In search of Romeo and Juliet. Journal of Social Psychology 45, 313314.Google Scholar
Wrzus, C., Hanel, M., Wagner, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 5380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, P., & Chiou, W. (2009). More options lead to more searching and worse choices in finding partners for romantic relationships online: An experimental study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 315318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zak, A., Coulter, C., Giglio, S., Hall, J., & Pellowski, N. (2002). Do his friends and family like me? Predictors of infidelity in intimate relationships. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 287291.Google Scholar
Zhang, S., & Kline, S. L. (2009). Can I make my own decision? A cross-cultural study of perceived social network influence in mate selection. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×