Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:32:51.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Assertion of Standard Essential Patents by Non-Practicing Entities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2017

D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, John R., Lemley, Mark A. and Schwartz, David L. 2014. Understanding the Realities of Modern Patent Litigation, Texas Law Review 92: 17691801.Google Scholar
Allison, John R., Lemley, Mark A. and Schwartz, David L.. 2016. How Often do Non-Practicing Entities Win Patent Suits? Stanford Law School Working Paper Series, Paper No. 485.Google Scholar
Allison, John R., Lemley, Mark A. and Walker, Joshua 2011. Patent Quality and Settlement Among Repeat Patent Litigants, Georgetown Law Journal 99: 677712.Google Scholar
Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., 757 F.3d 1286 (Fed. Cir. 2014).Google Scholar
Bekkers, Rudi and West, Joel 2009. The Limits to IPR Standardization Policies as Evidenced by Strategic Patenting in UMTS, Telecommunications Policy 33: 8097.Google Scholar
Blind, Knut, Bekkers, Rudi, Dietrich, Yann, Iversen, Eric, Köhler, Florian, Müller, Benoît, Pohlmann, Tim, Smeets, Stein, and Verweijen, Jurgen. 2011. Study on the Interplay between Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs), Final Report, available at http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/european-standards/files/standards_policy/ipr-workshop/ipr_study_final_report_en.pdf).Google Scholar
Charter Communications Inc. et al. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00055 (D.Del., Jan. 17, 2014) (Complaint).Google Scholar
Commonwealth Sci. & Indus. Research Org. v. Cisco Sys., Inc. (CSIRO), No. 6:11-CV-343, 2014 WL 3805817 (E.D. Tex. July 23, 2014), rev’d and remanded (Fed. Cir., Dec. 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. 2013. Fixing FRAND: A Pseudo-Pool Approach to Standards-Based Patent Licensing, Antitrust Law Journal 79: 4797.Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. 2016. When a Stranger Calls: Standards Outsiders and Unencumbered Patents, Journal of Competition Law and Economics 13(3).Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. and Gilbert, Richard J. 2015. A Unified Framework for RAND and Other Reasonable Royalties, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 30: 14471499.Google Scholar
Cotropia, Christopher A., Kesan, Jay P. and Schwartz, David L. 2014. Unpacking Patent Assertion Entities, Minnesota Law Review 99: 649703.Google Scholar
eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange LLC, 547 U.S. 388 (2006).Google Scholar
Ericsson v. D-Link, Case No. 6:10-CV-473, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110585 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2013).Google Scholar
European Commission – Directorate-General for Enterprise and Indus. (EC). 2014. Patents and Standards: A Modern Framework for IPR-Based Standardization.Google Scholar
Fischer, Timo and Henkel, Joachim 2012. Patent Trolls on Markets for Technology – An Empirical Analysis of NPE’s Patent Acquisitions, Research Policy 41: 15191533.Google Scholar
Golden, John M. 2013. Patent Privateers: Private Enforcement’s Historical Survivors, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 26: 545618.Google Scholar
Gupta, Kirti and Kesan, Jay, Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases (working paper Jul. 10, 2015), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2629399Google Scholar
Huawei v. ZTE, European Court of Justice (2015).Google Scholar
IEEE Standards Association (IEEE). 2015. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws, http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html.Google Scholar
In re. Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC. 2013a. No. 11-C-9308, 2013 WL 5593609 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 3, 2013)Google Scholar
In re. Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC. – 2013b. Memorandum and Order, 956 F.Supp.2d 925 (N.D.Ill. 2013).Google Scholar
Ivers, Dan 2014. Nortel Patent Buyer Accused of Intimidation Tactics, Law360, Jan. 17, 2014Google Scholar
Jeruss, Sara, Feldman, Robin and Walker, Joshua 2013. The America Invents Act 500: Effects of Patent Monetization Entities, Duke Law and Technology Review 11(2): 357389.Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. and Shapiro, Carl 2007. Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking, Texas Law Review 85: 19912049.Google Scholar
Lerner, Josh and Tirole, Jean 2015. Standard-Essential Patents, Journal of Political Economy 123: 547586.Google Scholar
Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60233 (W.D. Wash., Apr. 25, 2013)Google Scholar
In re. Motorola Mobility LLC & Google Inc., FTC Docket No. C-4410 (Jul. 23, 2013) (decision and order).Google Scholar
Mueller, Florian. 2010. Alcatel-Lucent Subsidiary Multimedia Patent Trust Sues Apple, LG, Canon and TiVo: AT&T Video Codec Patents Rear their Ugly Head Again, FOSS Patents, 21 Dec. 2010. www.fosspatents.com/2010/12/alcatel-lucent-subsidiary-multimedia.html.Google Scholar
Mullin, Joe. 2013. Patent War Goes Nuclear: Microsoft, Apple-owned ‘Rockstar’ Sues Google, Ars Technica, Oct. 31, 2013, http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/10/patent-war-goes-nuclear-microsoft-apple-owned-rockstar-sues-google/.Google Scholar
Mullin, Joe. 2015. Patent Troll Claims to Own Bluetooth, Scores $15.7 Million Verdict Against Samsung, Ars Technica, Feb. 17, 2015.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC). 2013. Intellectual Property Challenges For Standard-Setting in the Global Economy (Maskus, Keith and Merrill, Stephen A., eds., National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
In re. N-Data, FTC File No. 051-0094 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
In re. Nortel Networks, Inc., 469 B.R. 478, 488 (Bankr. D. Del. 2012).Google Scholar
In re. Rambus, Inc., No. 9302, 2006 WL 2330117 (F.T.C, Aug. 2, 2006), rev’d, 522 F.3d 456 (D.C. Cir. 2008).Google Scholar
Rembrandt Wireless Techs. LP v. Samsung Elecs. Co. Ltd., Case No. 2:13-CV-213-JRG (E.D. Tex. Feb. 16, 2015).Google Scholar
RPX Corporation 2016. 2015 Report – NPE Litigation, Patent Marketplace, and NPE Cost.Google Scholar
Searle Center on Law, Regulation, and Economic Growth at Northwestern University 2015. The Searle Center Database of Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl 2001. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, Innovation Policy and the Economy 1: 119150.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×