Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:10:07.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

c - Banks as Global Corporations: From Entities to ‘Ecological Habitats’

from 2 - The Multinational Corporate Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Anastasia Nesvetailova
Affiliation:
University of London
Ronen Palan
Affiliation:
University of London
Grietje Baars
Affiliation:
City University London
Andre Spicer
Affiliation:
City University London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this chapter is to offer a conceptualization of banks as global corporations. The major challenge in such a task is to see beyond the silos of the main academic disciplines that traditionally examine banks and banking and to recognize that, organizationally and functionally, modern banking operates under complex governance structures. These involve national and international regulations and norms, private industry standards (such as accounting and reporting standards), rules of compliance, registration, licensing and insurance provisions. Today, a typical multinational enterprise, banks included, consists of legally independent corporate entities, each licensed to operate within a specified territorial realm, that are linked to each other's legal entities in other countries (or even their own) through economic connections. This organizational and governance complexity is not easily accommodated within traditional academic approaches to finance and banking.

There appears to be a lack of a specialized academic tradition of analysing banks and other financial institutions and distinct entities. In economics, for instance, any enterprise – financial and non-financial – is typically understood as a firm, defined as an entity that ‘uses inputs to make output’ (Sloman et al., 2013: 4), a notion that abstracts away from legal, institutional, political and cultural specificities of modern economies. In political science – a discipline that enquires into the origins of power and influence – banks too, tend to be equated with other non-financial businesses and are examined on the basis of their political power and influence over decision making (Pagliari, 2015; Pagliari and Young, 2015). Legal scholars describe the phenomenon of the corporation broadly, focusing on the underlying property relations and debating the nature and the personality of the corporation. The latter, in turn, can be understood as either an agglomeration of individuals and hence a natural result of private initiative; or as an artificial creation of state law that has a separate existence from its shareholders and management (Millon, 1990: 201). None of these divergent disciplinary approaches to banking recognizes the specific features of banking, as a unique business enterprise, which endow financial institutions with unprecedented structural power in our societies. Yet, partly as a reflection of such specificities, the corporate character of global banks proves extremely difficult to pin down.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Corporation
A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook
, pp. 268 - 279
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R., and Mehran, H. (2003) ‘Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies?’ FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 123–142.
Adrian, T., and Shin, H. (2010) ‘Liquidity and leverage’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Report no, 328 (revised from May 2008).
Allen, F., Babus, A., and Carletti, E. (2010) ‘Financial connections and systemic risk’, NBER Working Paper, no. 16177, July.
Augar, P (2008) The Death of Gentlemanly Capitalism. The Rise and Fall of London's Investment Banks (London: Penguin).
Avraham, D., Selvaggi, P., and Vickery, J. (2012) ‘A structural view of US bank holding companies’, FRBNY Economic Policy Review 65–76.
Awrey, D. (2013) ‘Toward a supply-side theory of financial innovation’, Journal of Comparative Economics 41(2) 401–409.Google Scholar
Bank of England (2015) ‘Mapping the UK financial system’ Q2 Quarterly Bulletin, London.
France, Banque de (2008) Liquidity: special report, February, Paris.
Berle, A (2012 [1938]) ‘Accounting and the law’, Accounting, Economics, and Law 2 (1), originally published as (1928) The Accounting Review, 13(1): 9–15.Google Scholar
BIS (2014) A Sound Capital Planning Process: Fundamental Elements (Basel: Bank of International Settlement).
Caruana, J. (2009) ‘The international policy response to financial crises: making the macroprudential approach operational’, Panel remarks, at Jackson Hole, 21–22 August (Basel: BIS).
Chesney, M., Stromberg, J., and Wagner, A. (2010) ‘Risk-taking incentives, governance, and losses in the financial crisis’, Swiss Finance Institute Research paper no. 10–18, Swiss Finance Institute.
Demestz, H. (1988) ‘The theory of the firm revisited’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4(1): 141–61.Google Scholar
Desai, M. (2008) ‘The decentring of the global firm’, Harvard Business School Working Paper, 09–054.
Evstigneev, I., Hens, T. and Reiner Schenk-Hoppe, K. (2006) ‘Evolutionary finance’, Working Paper no 462, National Centre of Competence in Research Financial Valuation and Risk Management.
Financial Stability Board (2011) ‘Shadow Banking: Strengthening Oversight and Regulation’, Recommendations of the Financial Stability Board 27 October.
Freixas, X., Laeven, L., and Peydró, J. L. (2015) Systemic Risk, Crises, and Macroprudential Regulation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Friedman, M. (1970) ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’, New York Times Magazine 13 September, 32.
Goldin, I., and Vogel, T. (2010) ‘Global governance and systemic risk in the 21st century: lessons from the financial crisis’, Global Policy 1(1).Google Scholar
Greene, E., and Bloomfield, E. (2013) ‘Promoting risk mitigation, not migration: a comparative analysis of shadow banking reforms by the FSB, USA and EU’, Capital Markets Law Journal 8(1).Google Scholar
Guttmann, R. (2003) Cybercash. The Coming Era of Electronic Money (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
Guttmann, R., and Philon, D. (2010) ‘Consumer debt and financial fragility’, International Review of Applied Economics 24(3): 269–283.Google Scholar
Haldane, A. (2009) ‘Rethinking the financial network’, Speech at the Financial Student Association, Amsterdam, 28 April 2009.
Haldane, A., and May, R. (2011) ‘Systemic risk in banking ecosystems’, Nature 469: 351–355.Google Scholar
Hardie, I., and Howarth, D. (2013) ‘Market-based banking and the financial crisis’, Edinburgh University Working Paper, also as Hardie, I., and Howarth, D. (eds), Market-Based Banking and the International Financial Crisis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
IMF (2014) Global Financial Stability Report, chapter 3, October (Washington, DC: IMF).
Jensen, M. (2001) ‘Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function’, Amos Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College Working paper no. 01–09.
Keen, S. (1995) ‘Finance and economic breakdown: modelling Minsky's ‘financial instability hypothesis’, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 17(4).Google Scholar
Kregel, J. (2010) ‘No going back: why we cannot restore Glass-Steagall's segregation of banking and finance’, Public Policy Brief no. 107, Levy Institute of Bard College.
Langley, P. (2013) ‘Toxic assets, turbulence and biopolitical security: governing the crisis of global financial circulation’, Security Dialogue 44: 111–126.Google Scholar
Lysandrou, P. (2012) ‘The primacy of hedge funds in the subprime crisis’, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 34 (2).Google Scholar
Lysandrou, P., and Nesvetailova, A. (2014) ‘The role of securities in the shadow banking system: a disaggregated view’, Review of International Political Economy, published online first.
MacKenzie, D. (2006) ‘The material production of virtuality: innovation, cultural geography, and facticity in derivatives markets’, Edinburgh University Working Paper, December.
MacKenzie, D., and Spears, T. (2013) ‘A device for being able to book P&L: the organizational embedding of the Gaussian Copula’, Edinburgh University Working Paper, October.
McConnachie, A. (2009) ‘A history of banking regulation in the UK’, Prosperity, July.
McCulley, P. (2009) ‘The shadow banking system and Hyman Minsky's economic journey’, Global Central Bank Focus, PIMCO, May.
Mehran, H., Morrison, A., and Shapiro, J. (2011) ‘Corporate governance and banks: what have we learned from the financial crisis?’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report no. 502.
Mehrling, R. (2011) The New Lombard Street: How the Fed Became the Dealer of Last Resort (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Mehrling, P., Pozsar, Z., Sweeney, J., and Neilson, D. H. (2013) ‘Bagehot was a shadow banker: shadow banking, central banking, and the future of global finance, s l, SSRN.
Millon, D. (1990) ‘Theories of the corporation’, Duke Law Journal 39 (2): 201–262.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. (2008 [1986]) Stabilizing an Unstable Economy (New York and London: McGraw Hill).
OECD (2009) Corporate Governance and the Financial Crisis. Key Findings and Main Messages (Paris: OECD) June.
Pagliari, S. (2014) ‘International harmonization of financial regulation? The politics of global diffusion of the Basel capital accord’, International Studies Review 16(4): 673–675.Google Scholar
Pagliari, S., and Young, K. (2015) ‘Capital united? Business unity in regulatory politics and the special place of finance’, Regulation and Governance (September).
Papadimitriou, D. (2010) ‘Preface’ in Kregel, J.. ‘No going back: why we cannot restore Glass-Steagall's Segregation of banking and finance’, Public Policy Brief no. 107, Levy Institute of Bard College.
Persaud, A. (2008) ‘Regulation, valuation and systemic liquidity’, Financial Stability Review 12 (12), Banque de France.Google Scholar
Polillo, S. (2013) Conservatives versus Wildcats. A Sociology of Financial Conflict (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press).
Raberto, M., Tegllio, A., and Cincoti, S. (2012) ‘Debt deleveraging and business cycles. an agent-based perspective’ 27 (July) Economics, special issue on ‘New approaches in quantitative modeling of financial markets’.
Robé, J.-P. (2011) ‘The legal structure of the firm’, Accounting, Economics, and Law 1(5): 1–86.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1962) ‘The architecture of complexity’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106(6).Google Scholar
Sloman, J., Hinde, K., and Garratt, D. (2013) Economics for Business (Harlow: Pearson).
Srivastava, R., Shervani, T., and Fahey, L. (1998) ‘Market-based assets and shareholder value: a framework for analysis’, Journal of Marketing 62: 2–18.Google Scholar
Thurner, S. (2011) ‘Systemic financial risk: agent-based models to understand the leverage cycle on national scales and its consequences’, IFP/FGS Working Paper, 14 January.
Turner, A. (2012) ‘Shadow banking and financial instability’, Cass Business School Lecture, 14 March.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×