Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:07:54.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eugenics in Japan: Some Ironies of Modernity, 1883–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Sumiko Otsubo  and
James R. Bartholomew
Sumiko Otsubo
Affiliation:
Department of History, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska
James R. Bartholomew
Affiliation:
Department of History, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Japanese eugenic discourse and institution building contrast sharply with comparable movements elsewhere. As a social-intellectual phenomenon, Anglo- American eugenics considered the Japanese racially inferior to Western peoples; yet eugenic ideals and policies achieved a remarkable popularity in Japan. Most of mainstream Japanese genetics was derived from orthodox Mendelian roots in Germany and (to a lesser degree) the United States. But French-style Lamarckian notions of the inheritability of acquired characters held surprising popularity among enthusiasts of eugenics. Japanese eugenicists could condemn the actions of foreign eugenicists like Charles Davenport in the United States for their efforts to forbid Japanese immigration in the 1920s, yet appeal to these same eugenicists as a source of legitimacy in Japan.

These paradoxes can partly be explained against a background of relative isolation in a period of profound social change. Few Japanese eugenicists had close personal contact with foreign eugenicists, and most of their knowledge was acquired through reading rather than direct exposure. The eugenic ideal of ethnic purity was attractive to a society long accustomed to monoracial self-imagery. The need to defend national independence in an era of high imperialism seemed to require the most up-to-date policies and ideas. And Japan's own acquisition of an overseas empire seemed to demand a population management philosophy ostensibly based on scientific principles. These and other forces supported the implementation of eugenic policies and prescriptions among the Japanese people in the first half of the twentieth century.

Type
Historical Perspectives
Information
Science in Context , Volume 11 , Issue 3-4 , Autumn-Winter 1998 , pp. 545 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Mark B. 1990. “Toward a Comparative History of Eugenics.” In The Wellborn Science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia, edited by Adams, Mark B., 217–231. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, James R. 1989. The Formation of Science in Japan: Building a Research Tradition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Castle, William E., Coulter, John M., Davenport, Charles B., East, Edward M., and Tower, William L.. 1912. Heredity and Eugenics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
“Dai-hachi shô (Ainu no kenkyû) iinkai no kaisan.” 1937–38. Nihion Gakujutsu Shinkôkai nenpô no. 5:22.Google Scholar
“Yûseikai, Dai Nihon.” 1917. Jinsei 13(7):263–264.Google Scholar
“Dai ni, setsuritsu-an fu sanseinin.” 1925. Yûseigaku no. 32:15–19.Google Scholar
Davenport, Charles B. [1924] 1925. Letter to R. Gotô, Hyôgo, 2 July. Reprinted in “Yôzenikkusu no rekishiteki kôshin no ichi.” Yûseigaku no. 14:6.Google Scholar
Doak, Kevin M. 1997. ”What is a Nation and Who Belongs? National Narratives and the Ethnic Imagination in Twentieth-Century Japan.” American Historical Review 102(2):283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“ken, Dôjin no.” 1925. Yûseigaku no. 21:30–1.Google Scholar
Dower, John W. 1986. War without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
“Eugenics' in Japanese.” 1925. Eugenical News 10(2):23.Google Scholar
Yutaka, Fujino. 1994a. “Buraku mondai to yûsei shisô.” Buraku kaihô kenkytû no. 100:124–142.Google Scholar
Yutaka, Fujino. 1994b. “Hisabetsu buraku.”In Iwanami kôza Nihon tsûshi, vol. 18, Kindai 3, edited by Naohiro, Asao, Yoshihiko, Amino, Susumu, Ishii, Masanao, Kano, Shôhachi, Hayakawa, and Yoshio, Yasumaru, 135–167. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Yutaka, Fujino. 1998. Nihon fashizumu to yûsei shisô. Kyoto: Kamogawa Shuppan.Google Scholar
Kunizô, Fukuda. 1957. “Nagai sensei no fûkaku.” Nihon iji shinpô no. 1725:74.Google Scholar
Garon, Sheldon. 1994. “Rethinking Modernization and Modernity in Japanese History: A Focus on State-Society Relations.” Journal of Asian Studies 53(2) 346–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotô, R. [1924] 1925. Letter to Charles B. Davenport, 15 June. Reprinted in “Yûzenikusu no rekishiteki kôshin no ichi.” Yûseigaku no. 13:6.Google Scholar
Ryûkichi, Gotô. 1926a. “Takeshi no oitachi no ki (2).” Yûseigaku no. 31:22–23.Google Scholar
Ryûkichi, Gotô 1926b. “Takeshi no oitachi no ki (3).” Yûseigaku no. 32:27–29.Google Scholar
Ryûkichi, Gotô 1926c. “Takeshi no oitachi no ki (4).” Yûseigaku no. 33:26–28.Google Scholar
Ryûkichi, Gotô. 1926d. “Takeshi no oitachi no ki (5).” Yûseigaku no. 34:25–27.Google Scholar
Ryûkichi, Gotô. 1926e. “Yûsei undô ni chokumen shite.” Yûsei undô 1(1):64–66.Google Scholar
Ryûkichi, Gotô. 1936. Isei ronsô. Ôsaka: Kansai Ijisha.Google Scholar
Kiyoshi, Hiroshima. 1980. “Gendai Nihon jinkô seisakushi shôron: Jinkô shishitsu gainen o megutte (1916 nen-1930 nen).”Jinkô mondai kenkyû no. 154:46–61.Google Scholar
Horn, David G. 1994. Social Bodies: Science, Reproduction, and Italian Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Congress of Eugenics. 1934. A Decade of Progress in Eugenics: Scientific Papers of the Third International Congress of Eugenics held at American Museum of Natural History, New York, August 21–23, 1932. Baltimore: William and Wilkins.Google Scholar
“yokoku, Jigô.” 1926. Yûseigaku no. 25:15.Google Scholar
“iinchô, Kakushu iinkai.” 1936–37. Nihon Gakujuisu Shinkôkai nenpô no. 4: 145.Google Scholar
“ji, Kantô no.” 1926. Yûseigaku no. 26: 4.Google Scholar
Hiroyuki, Katô. [1915]1917. “Dai Nihon Gakujutsu Kyôkai setsuritsu sengensho.” Reprinted in Yamanouchi Shigeo, 1917, Jinrui no iden, n.p. Tokyo: Dai Nihon Gakujutsu Kyôkai.Google Scholar
Nobunori, Kayô. 1964. “Yûsei Kekkon Sôdanjo no omoide.” Minzoku eisei 30(2): 31–33.Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. [1985] 1986. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
“Kinkoku, .” 1926. Yûseigaku no. 34:33.Google Scholar
Shige, Koike. 1957. “Nagai Hisomu hakushi no fu o kiite.” Nippon iji shinpô no. 1726: 73.Google Scholar
“Yûsei-hô, Kokumin.” 1976. Isei hyakunenshi, ed. Imukoku, Kôseishô. Vol. 2, Shiryôhen, 297–300. Tokyo: Gyôsei.Google Scholar
Taku, Komai. 1930. Letter from Komai Taku. Reprinted in “Komai Taku shi shokan.” Yûseigaku no. 80:5.Google Scholar
Imukyoku, Kôseishô, ed. 1955. Isei hachijûnenshi. Tokyo: Insatsukyoku Chôyôkai.Google Scholar
“undô, Kyôkai no sôritsu.” 1925. Yûseigaku no. 22:6.Google Scholar
Laughlin, H. H. [1924] 1925. Letter from H. H. Laughlin to Japan Eugenics Society, Hyôgo, 8 July. Reprinted in “Yûzenikkusu no rekishiteki kôshin no ni.” Yûseigaku no. 15:6.Google Scholar
Yôko, Matsubara. 1997. “Minzoku yûsei hogo-hô an to Nihon no yûsei-hô no keifu.” Kagakushi kenkyû no. 201:42–50.Google Scholar
Merrington, M., Blundell, B., Burrough, S., Golden, J. and Hogarth, J., compiled. 1983. A List of the Papers and Correspondence of Karl Pearson (1858–1936) held in the Manuscripts Room University College London Library. London: Publication Office, University College London.Google Scholar
Hisomu, Nagai. 1913. Seimeiron. Tokyo: Rakuyôdô.Google Scholar
Hisomu, Nagai. 1915. Seimeiron. Revised ed. Tokyo: Rakuyôdô.Google Scholar
Hisomu, Nagai. 1916. Seibutsugaku to tetsugaku to no sakai. Tokyo: Rakuyôdô.Google Scholar
Hisomu, Nagai. 1936. “Furoku minzoku eisei shinkô no kengi.” Minzoku eisei 5 (3 and 4, combined), supplement: 401–406.Google Scholar
Masao, Nakamura, ed. 1943. Nihon Joshi Daigakkô yonjûnenshi. Tokyo: Nihon Joshi Daigakkô.Google Scholar
Jinzô, Naruse. [1881]1974. “Onna no tsutome.” Reprinted in Naruse Jinzô chosakushû, vol. 1, edited by Chosakushû Iinkai, Naruse Jinzô, 1–28. Tokyo: Nihon Joshi Daigaku.Google Scholar
Jinzô, Naruse. [1891] 1974a. Diary, 10 August. Reprinted in Naruse Jinzô chosakushû, vol. 1, edited by Chosakushû Iinkai, Naruse Jinzô, 504. Tokyo: Nihon Joshi Daigaku.Google Scholar
Jinzô, Naruse. [1891] 1974b. “Taiheiyô kôkaichû no shokan.” Jogaku zasshi, no. 252. Reprinted in Naruse Jinzô chosakushû, vol. 1, edited by Chosakushû Iinkai, Naruse Jinzô, 217–20. Tokyo: Nihon Joshi Daigaku.Google Scholar
Jinzô, Naruse. [1896] 1974. “Joshi kyôiku.” Reprinted in Naruse Jinzô chosakushû, vol. 1, edited by Chosakushû Iinkai, Naruse Jinzô, 29–155. Tokyo: Nihon Joshi Daigaku.Google Scholar
Jinzô, Naruse. 1918. Joshi kyôiku kaizen iken. Tokyo: Hakubunkan.Google Scholar
Shinkôkai, Nihon Gakujutsu. [1938] 1967. “Nihon Gakujutsu Shinkôkai gakujutsu-bu Ainu kenkyû dai-hachi shô iinkai gaiyô.” Reprinted in Nihon kagaku gijutsushi taikei, vol. 25, Igaku 2,207–9. Tokyo: Daiichi Hôki Shuppan.Google Scholar
Jinzô, Naruse. [1946] 1967. “Nihon Gakujutsu Shinkôkai gakujutsu-bu tokubetsu iinkai oyobi shô iinkai ichiran.” Reprinted in Nihon kagaku gijutsushi taikei, vol. 25, Igaku 2, 210–1. Tokyo: Daiichi Hôki Shuppan.Google Scholar
“Nihon Gakujutsu Shinkôkai no yûsei kengi.” 1937. Yûsei 2 (6 and 7, combined): 18–20.Google Scholar
“Nihon Minzoku Eisei Gakkai no sôritsu.” 1931. Minzoku eisei 1(1):94–5.Google Scholar
“Nihon Minzoku Eisei Kyôkai no Yûseigaku Dantai Kokusai Renmei e no kanyû.” 1936. Minzoku eisei 5 (1 and 2, combined): 245.Google Scholar
“Nihon Yûsei Gakkai setsuritsu no kiun to Yûseigaku Dantai Kokusai Renmei no jôkyô.” 1930. Yûseigaku no. 77:17–22.Google Scholar
“Notes and News.” 1924. Eugenical News 9(7):64.Google Scholar
“Odawara shibu hokkaishiki.” 1936. Yûsei 1(5):23–4.Google Scholar
Miho, Ogino. 1991. “Jinkô ninshin chûzetsu to josei no jiko ketteiken: Dai-ni-ji Sekai Taisengo no Nihon.” In Bosei kara jisedai ikuseiryoku e: Umi sodateru shakai no tame ni, edited by Hiroko, Hara and Kaoru, Tachi, 109–143. Tokyo: Shin'yôsha.Google Scholar
Eiji, Oguma. 1995. Tan'itsu minzoku shinwa no kigen. Tokyo: Shin'yôsha.Google Scholar
Otsubo, Sumiko. Forthcoming. “Engendering Eugenics: Feminists and Marriage Restriction Legislation in the 1920s.” In Gendering Modern Japanese History, edited by Molony, Barbara and Uno, Kathleen. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Papenfuss, George F. 1957. “Progress and Outstanding Achievements in Phycology during the Past Fifty Years.” American Journal of Botany 44(1):74–81.Google Scholar
Redfield, Casper L. 1914. Dynamic Evolution: A Study of the Causes of Evolution and Degeneracy. New York and London: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
“Ressei undô!” 1926. Yûseigaku.no. 34:30.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1972. G. Stanley Hall: The Psychologist as Prophet. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
“ken, Sanseinin no.” 1925. Yûseigaku no. 21:31.Google Scholar
“keika, Setsuritsu.” 1932–1934. Nihon Gakujutsu Shinkôkai nenpô no. 1:1–2.Google Scholar
Saitoh, Hikaru. 1996. “Studies on the History of Biology in Japan.” Historia Scientiarum 6(2):109–122.Google Scholar
“shôkai, Shinkan.” 1924. Yûseigaku no. 5:26.Google Scholar
Shunjûsei (Gotô Ryûkichi). 1926. “Yakugo ‘yûseigaku’ raisan.” Yûseigaku no. 33: 14.Google Scholar
Siddle, Richard. 1997. “The Ainu and the Discourse of ‘Race.’.” In The Construction of Racial Identities in China and Japan, edited by Dikötter, Frank. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Nancy Leys. 1991. “The Hour of Eugenics”: Race Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zenji, Suzuki. 1968. “Yûzenikkusu ni taisuru Nihon no han'nô.” Kagakushi kenkyû 87:129–136.Google Scholar
Zenji, Suzuki. 1974. “Geneticists and Eugenics Movement in Japan and America: A Comparative Study.” Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of the History of Science no. 3:68–70.Google Scholar
Zenji, Suzuki. 1983. Nihon no yûseigaku: Sono shisô to undô no kiseki. Tokyo: Sankyô Shuppan.Google Scholar
Zenji, Suzuki Yôko, Matsubara, and Tôru, Sakano. 1995. “Tenbô: Yûseigakushi kenkyû no dôkô III: Amerika oyobi Nihon no yûseigaku ni kansuru rekishi kenkyû.” Kagakushi kenkyû no. 194:97–106.Google Scholar
Takagi, Hiroshi. 1993. “Fashizukuki, Ainu minzoku no dôkaron.” In Bunka to fashizumu: Senjika Nihon ni okeru bunka no kôbô, edited by Shirô, Akazawa and Kenzô, Kitagawa, 247–83. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyôronsha.Google Scholar
Yoshio, Takahashi. [1884] 1961. “Nihon jinshu kairyô ron.” In Meiji bunka shiryô sôsho, edited by Ryûichi, Kaji. Vol. 6. Shakai mondai hen, 15–55. Tokyo: Kazama Shobô.Google Scholar
Shigeyo, Takeuchi. 1936. “Kaikai no ji.” Yûsei 1(10):3–4.Google Scholar
Tekisuishi (Gotô Ryûkichi). 1924. “Henshûshitsu yori.” Yûseigaku no. 5:34.Google Scholar
Ichirô, Tomiyama. 1994. “Kokumin no tanjô to ‘Nihon jinshu.’” Shisô; no. 845: 37–56.Google Scholar
Ichirô, Tomiyama. 1996. “Sokutei to iu gihô: Jinshu kara kokumin e.” In Edo no shisô. Vol. 4, Kokka (jikozô no keisei, edited by Edo no Shisô Henshû Iinkai, 119–129. Tokyo: Perikansha.Google Scholar
Ichirô, Tomiyama. 1997. “Ryûkyûjin to iu shutai.” Shisô no. 878:5–33.Google Scholar
Isao, Tsuji. 1992. “Nihon Joshi Daigaku sôritsu tôji no kyôin soshiki ni kansuru kenkyû.” Nihon Joshi Daigaku kiyô (Ningen shakai gakubu) no. 3:33–45.Google Scholar
Tsuneishi, Kei-ichi. 1984. “C. Koizumi: As a Promoter of the Ministry of Health and Welfare and an Originator of the BCW Research Program.” Historia Scientiarum no. 26:95–113.Google Scholar
Eiichi, Watanabe, ed. 1948. Nihon Joshi Daigaku sôritsusha Naruse sensei, revised ed. Tokyo: Ô;fûkai Shuppanbu.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Masao. 1990. The Japanese and Western Science. Translated by Benfey, Otto Theodor. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Michael. 1997. “The Invention of Identity: Race and Nation in Pre-war Japan.” In The Construction of Racial Identities in China and Japan, edited by Dikötter, Frank. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Shigeo, Yamanouchi. 1914. Saibô to iden. Tokyo: Dai Nihon Tosho.Google Scholar
Shigeo, Yamanouchi. 1915. Idenron. Tokyo: Dai Nihon Gakujutsu Kyôkai.Google Scholar
Shigeo, Yamanouchi. 1916a. “Kaimu purazumu setsu ni hantai suru ichi gakusetsu: Kakutoku sei no iden ni tsuite.” Kyôiku gakujutsukai 33(5):1–4.Google Scholar
Shigeo, Yamanouchi. 1916b. “Kakutokusei no iden.” Hakubutsu gakkaishi no. 21:22–6.Google Scholar
Shigeo, Yamanouchi. 1916c. “Vaisuman no seishokushitsu ni hantai suru iken.” Hakubutsu gakkaishi no. 22:7–10.Google Scholar
Shigeo, Yamanouchi. 1917. Jinrui no iden. Tokyo: Dai Nihon Gakujutsu Kyôkai.Google Scholar
“Zaidan Hôjin Nihon Yûseigaku Kyôkai sôritsu hokkinin shimei.” 1925. Yûseigaku no. 18:30.Google Scholar