Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:38:40.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Axisymmetrization and vorticity-gradient intensification of an isolated two-dimensional vortex through filamentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

M. V. Melander ,
J. C. Mcwilliams  and
N. J. Zabusky
M. V. Melander
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, PO Box 3000, Bulder, CO 80307, USA Present address: Institute for Computational Mathematics and Applications, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
J. C. Mcwilliams
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, PO Box 3000, Bulder, CO 80307, USA
N. J. Zabusky
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, PO Box 3000, Bulder, CO 80307, USA Present address: Institute for Computational Mathematics and Applications, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the evolution of an isolated elliptical vortex in a weakly dissipative fluid. It is shown computationally that a spatially smooth vortex relaxes inviscidly towards axisymmetry on a circulation timescale as the result of filament generation. Heuristically, we derive a simple geometrical formula relating the rate of change of the aspect ratio of a particular vorticity contour to its orientation relative to the streamlines (where the orientation is defined through second-order moments). Computational evidence obtained with diagnostic algorithms validates the formula. By considering streamlines in a corotating frame and applying the new formula, we obtain a detailed kinematic understanding of the vortex's decay to its final state through a primary and a secondary breaking. The circulation transported into the filaments although a small fraction of the total, breaks the symmetry and is the chief cause of axisymmetrization.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 178 , May 1987 , pp. 137 - 159
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Haidvogel, D. B. 1985 Particle dispersion and Lagrangian vorticity conservation in models of β-turbulence. J. Phys. Oceanogr. submitted.Google Scholar
Hernan, M. A. & Jimenez, J. 1982 Computer analysis of a high speed film of the plane turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 323–345.Google Scholar
Kida, S. 1981 Motion of an elliptic vortex in a uniform shear flow. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 50, 3517–3520.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn, Cambridge University Press.
Mcwilliams, J. C. 1984 The emergence of isolated vortices in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 21–43.Google Scholar
Melander, M. V., Styczek, A. S. & Zabusky, N. J. 1984 Elliptically desingularized vortex model of the 2D Euler equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1222–1225.Google Scholar
Melander, M. V., Zabusky, N. J. & Styczek, A. S. 1986 A moment model for vortex interactions of the two-dimensional Euler equations. I. Computational validation of a Hamiltonian elliptical representation. J. Fluid Mech. 167, 95–115.Google Scholar
Overman, E. A. & Zabusky, N. J. 1982 Evolution and merger of isolated vortex structures. Phys. Fluids 25, 1297–1305.Google Scholar
Overman, E. A. & Zabusky, N. J. 1984 Diagnostic algorithms for contour dynamics. Trans. First Army Conf. on Appl. Maths and Computing. ARO Rep. 84–1, pp. 269–287.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E., Chong, M. S. & Lim, T. T. 1982 The vortex-Shedding process behind two-dimensional bluff bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 116, 77–90.Google Scholar
Zabusky, N. J. 1982 Computational synergetics and mathematical innovation. J. Comp. Phys. 195.Google Scholar
Zabusky, N. J. 1984 Computational Synergetics. Phys. Today, July, 1–11.Google Scholar
Zabusky, N. J., Hughes, M. H. & Roberts, K. V. 1979 Contour dynamics for the Euler equations in two dimensions. J. Comp. Phys. 30, 96–106.Google Scholar