Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:55:20.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Integrating nature values in urban planning and design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Kevin J. Gaston
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In several chapters of this book it is emphasised that urban ecosystems are under constant threat by ongoing urbanisation, by biological invasions and by human use. Other chapters, however, highlight the specific character of urban ecosystems (that by definition is indicated by the dominant role of urban dynamics) and their importance to human wellbeing and quality of life. This divergence illustrates two fundamentally different views of urban ecosystems: as remnants of (previously extensive) natural ecosystems threatened by ongoing human pressure, or as green patches with high use value to people who work and live in the city landscape. From the first perspective urban ecosystems are separated as much as possible from the urban system, and from the second they are an essential part of that system.

These divergent views on urban ecosystems illustrate the type of debate that can be expected from the variety of participants in an urban planning process. They may hold opposing views and economic stakes, but have to develop a common position on the desired future of the urban landscape, and what it would take to achieve this. In this chapter we consider how both the conservation (in terms of defending pieces of highly valued ecosystems against undesired changes) and the enhancement (in terms of creating additional ecological, social or economic value) of urban ecosystems can be integrated into decision making on urban development.

Type
Chapter
Information
Urban Ecology , pp. 261 - 286
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, L. W. (2005). Urban wildlife ecology and conservation: a brief history of the discipline. Urban Ecosystems, 8, 139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, L. W. and Dove, L. E. (1989). Wildlife Reserves and Corridors in the Urban Environment: A Guide to Ecological Landscape Planning and Resource Conservation. Columbia, MD: National Institute of Urban Wildlife.Google Scholar
Ahern, J. (1995). Greenways as a planning strategy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, E. (2006). Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecology and Society, 11, 34. Available at http://www.ecology and society.org/vol11/iss1/art34/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araújo, M. B. (2003). The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnfield, A. J. (2003). Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. International Journal of Climatology, 23, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asakawa, S., Yoshida, K. and Yabe, K. (2004). Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, C. (2000). How to Make a Wildlife Garden. London: Frances Lincoln.Google Scholar
Baumann, N. (2006). Ground-nesting birds on green roofs in Switzerland: preliminary observations. Urban Habitats, 4, 37–50.Google Scholar
Bergen, S. D., Bolton, S. M. and Fridley, J. L. (2001). Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering, 18, 201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, P. and Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, D. B., Karr, J. R., Schauman, S.et al. (2004). Reviving urban streams: land use, hydrology, biology, and human behaviour. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40, 1351–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brawn, J. D. and Stotz, D. E. (2001). The importance of the Chicago region and the Chicago Wilderness initiative for avian conservation. In Marzluff, J. M., Bowman, R. and Donnelly, R., eds., Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. New York: Kluwer, pp. 509–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenneisen, S. (2003). The benefits of biodiversity from green roofs: key design consequences. In Proceedings of the First Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Awards and Trade Show (Chicago, 2003). Toronto: Green Roofs for Healthy Cities.Google Scholar
Brenneisen, S. (2006). Space for wildlife: designing green roofs for habitat in Switzerland. Urban Habitats, 4, 27–36.Google Scholar
Breuste, J. (2004). Decision making, planning and design for the conservation of indigenous vegetation within urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 439–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briffett, C. (2001). Is managed recreational use compatible with effective habitat and wildlife occurrence in urban open space corridor systems?Landscape Research, 26, 137–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, M. M. (2006). Urban landscape conservation and the role of ecological greenways at local and metropolitan scales. Landscape and Urban Planning, 76, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabeza, M. and Moilanen, A. (2001). Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 242–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clergeau, P., Mennechez, G., Sauvage, A. and Lemoine, A. (2001). Human perception and appreciation of birds: a motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France. In Marzluff, J. M., Bowman, R. and Donnelly, R., eds., Avian Ecology in an Urbanizing World. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, pp. 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conine, A., Xiang, W.-N., Young, J. and Whitley, D. (2004). Planning for multipurpose greenways in Concord, North Carolina. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelis, J. and Hermy, M. (2004). Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Z. G., Fuller, R. A., Loram, A.et al. (2009). A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biological Conservation, 142, 761–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, R. and Marzluff, J. M. (2004). Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conservation Biology, 18, 733–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnett, N. P. and Kingsbury, N. (2004). Planting Green Roofs and Living Walls. Portland, OR: Timber Press.Google Scholar
Dunnett, N., Nagase, A. and Hallam, A. (2008). The dynamics of planted and colonising species on a green roof over six growing seasons 2001–2006: influence of substrate depth. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 373–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emilsson, T. (2008). Vegetation development on extensive vegetated green roofs: influence of substrate composition, establishment method and species mix. Ecological Engineering, 33, 265–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E. and Jokimäki, J. (2001). A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 2023–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J., Smith, R. M., Thompson, K. and Warren, P. H. (2005). Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gattie, D. K., Smith, M. C., Tollner, E. W. and McCutcheon, S. C. (2003). The emergence of ecological engineering as a discipline. Ecological Engineering, 20, 409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godefroid, S. and Koedam, N. (2003). How important are large vs. small forest remnants for the conservation of the woodland flora in an urban context?Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 287–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, F., Tamarit, N. and Jabaloyes, J. (2001). Green zones, bioclimatic studies and human comfort in the future development of urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55, 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G., Engleback, L. and Nicholson, B. (2003). Green Roofs: Existing Status and Potential for Conserving Biodiversity in Urban Areas. English Nature Research Report No. 498. Peterborough, UK: English Nature.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. and Davies, G. (2002). Conserving biodiversity that matters: practitioners' perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London. Journal of Environmental Management, 65, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J.et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, D., Gries, C., Zhu, W. X.et al. (2003). Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100, 8788–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishii, H. T. and Iwasaki, A. (2008). Ecological restoration of a fragmented urban shrine forest in southeastern Hyogo Prefecture, Japan: initial effects of the removal of invasive Trachycarpus fortunei. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 309–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, L. (2003). The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. A. (2002). Tecticolous Invertebrates: A Preliminary Investigation of the Invertebrate Fauna on Ecoroofs in Urban London. London: English Nature.Google Scholar
Jordan, C. F. (1995). Conservation: Replacing Quantity with Quality as a Goal for Global Management. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kadas, G. (2002). Study of invertebrates on green roofs: how roof design can maximize biodiversity in an urban environment. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University College London, England.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. (2007). Employees' reactions to nearby nature at their workplace: the wild and the tame. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klausnitzer, B. (1993). Ökologie der Großstadtfauna. G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Köhler, M. (2008). Green facades – a view back and some visions. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 423–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühn, I., Brandl, R. and Klotz, S. (2004). The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 749–64.Google Scholar
Landsberg, H. (1981). The Urban Climate. International Geophysics Series 28. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Larned, S. T., Suren, A. S., Flanagan, M., Biggs, B. J. F. and Riis, T. (2006). Macrophytes in urban stream rehabilitation: establishment, ecological effects, and public perception. Restoration Ecology, 14, 429–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Wang, R., Paulussen, J. and Liu, X. (2005). Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72, 325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X., Poon, C.-S. and Liu, P. S. (2001). Heavy metal contamination of urban soils and street dusts in Hong Kong. Applied Geochemistry, 16, 1361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loram, A., Tratalos, J., Warren, P. H. and Gaston, K. J. (2007). Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecology, 22, 601–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madge, P. (1997). Ecological design: a new critique. Design Issues, 13, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margules, C. and Sarkar, S. (2007). Systematic Conservation Planning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, J., Moorman, C., Hess, G. and Sinclair, K. (2007). Designing suburban greenways to provide habitat for forest-breeding birds. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, 153–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M. L. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience, 52, 883–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. R. (2008). Conserving biodiversity in metropolitan landscapes. Landscape Journal, 27, 115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. R. and Hobbs, R. J. (2002). Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology, 16, 330–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, A. P. (2009). Successful city dwellers: a comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the Western Palearctic. Oecologia, 159, 849–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mörtberg, U. and Wallentinus, H.-G. (2000). Red-listed forest bird species in an urban environment – assessment of green space corridors, Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, D. D. (1988). Challenges to biological diversity in urban areas. In Wilson, E. O., ed., Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 71–6.Google Scholar
Murton, R. K., Thearle, R. J. P. and Thompson, J. (1972). Ecological studies of the feral pigeon Columba livia var. I. Population, breeding biology and methods of control. Journal of Applied Ecology, 9, 835–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberndorfer, E., Lundholm, J., Bass, B.et al. (2007). Green roofs as urban ecosystems: ecological structures, functions, and services. BioScience, 57, 823–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oke, T. R. (1982). The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 108, 1–24.Google Scholar
Opdam, P. and Steingröver, E. (2008). Designing metropolitan landscapes for biodiversity: deriving guidelines from metapopulation ecology. Landscape Journal, 27, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opdam, P., Steingrover, E. and Rooij, S. (2006). Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 322–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opdam, P., Verboom, J. and Pouwels, R. (2003). Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecology, 18, 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, R. and Vasconcelos, H. L. (2007). Invertebrate conservation in urban areas: ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, G. C., Fitzsimons, J. A., Antos, M. J. and White, J. G. (2008). Determinants of native avian richness in suburban remnant vegetation: implications for conservation planning. Biological Conservation, 141, 2329–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penttinen, P., Timonen, K. L., Tiittanen, P.et al. (2001). Ultrafine particles in urban air and respiratory health among adult asthmatics. European Respiratory Journal, 17, 428–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pressey, R. L., Cabeza, M., Watts, M. E., Cowling, R. M. and Wilson, K. A. (2007). Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 583–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savard, J.-P. L., Clergeau, Ph. and Mennechez, G. (2000). Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 131–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searns, R. M. (1995). The evolution of greenways as an adaptive urban landscape form. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shijun, M. (1985). Ecological engineering: application of ecosystem principles. Environmental Conservation, 12, 331–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snep, R. P. H. (2009). Biodiversity conservation at business sites – options and opportunities.Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands. Full text available at http://edepot.wur.nl/92.Google Scholar
Snep, R. P. H. and Ottburg, F. G. W. A. (2008). The ‘habitat backbone’ as a nature conservation strategy for industrial areas: lessons from the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) in the Port of Antwerp (Belgium). Landscape Ecology, 23, 1277–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snep, R. P. H., Opdam, P. F. M., Baveco, J. M.et al. (2006). How peri-urban areas can strengthen animal populations in cities: a modeling approach. Biological Conservation, 127, 345–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snep, R. P. H., Ierland, E. C. and Opdam, P. (2009). Enhancing biodiversity at business sites: what are the options, and which of these do stakeholders prefer?Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, B. and Biedermann, R. (2006). Urban brownfields as temporary habitats: driving forces for the diversity of phytophagous insects. Ecography, 29, 928–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukopp, H. (1986). Naturschutzstrategien in der Stadt. In Kaule, G., ed., Arten- und Biotopschutz. Stuttgart, pp. 434–9.Google Scholar
Sukopp, H. and Starfinger, U. (1999). Disturbance in human ecosystems. In Walker, L. R., ed., Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 397–412.Google Scholar
Sukopp, H. and Weiler, S. (1988). Biotope mapping and nature conservation strategies in urban areas of the Federal Republic of Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukopp, H., Numata, M. and Huber, A. (eds.) (1995). Urban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning. The Hague, the Netherlands: SPB Academic.
Todd, N. J. and Todd, J. (1994). From Eco-cities to Living Machines: Principles of Ecological Design. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Tratalos, J., Fuller, R. A., Warren, P. H., Davies, R. G. and Gaston, K. J. (2007). Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 308–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, G., Ash, H. and Plant, C. (2005). Review of the Coverage of Urban Habitats and Species Within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. English Nature Research Reports 651. Northminster House, Peterborough: English Nature.Google Scholar
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S.et al. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 167–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasquez, L. S. (2005). Organic greenroof architecture: design considerations and system components. Environmental Quality Management (Summer). Available at http://www.greenroofs.com/pdfs/news-EQM_VelazquezPart2.pdf.
Verboom, J., Foppen, R., Chardon, P., Opdam, P. and Luttikhuizen, P. (2001). Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds. Biological Conservation, 100, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D. and Ladson, A. R. (2005). Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24, 690–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheater, C. P. (1999). Urban Habitats. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, J. C., Healy, M. T. and Zedler, J. B. (2007). Restoring native vegetation to an urban wet meadow dominated by Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in Wisconsin. Natural Areas Journal, 27, 354–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. (2008). Making the case for landscape ecology an effective approach to urban sustainability. Landscape Journal, 27, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×