Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:16:43.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Genetics and landscape connectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Kevin R. Crooks
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
M. Sanjayan
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Virginia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balloux, F., and Goudet, J.. 2002. Statistical properties of population differentiation estimators under stepwise mutation in a finite island model. Molecular Ecology 11:771–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthold, P., and Pulido, F.. 1994. Heritability of migratory activity in a natural bird population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 257:311–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthold, P., Helbig, A. J., Mohr, G., and Querner, U.. 1992. Rapid microevolution of migratory behaviour in a wild bird species. Nature 360:668–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohonak, A. J. 1999. Dispersal, gene flow and population structure. Quarterly Review of Biology 74:21–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brook, B. W., O'Grady, J. J., Chapman, A. P., et al. 2000. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404:385–387CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brook, B. W., Tonkyn, D. W., O'Grady, J. J., and Frankham, R.. 2002. Contribution of inbreeding to extinction risk in threatened species. Conservation Ecology6:16. Available online at http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss11/art16Google Scholar
Bryant, E. H., Backus, V. L., Clark, M. E., and Reed, D. H.. 1999. Experimental tests of captive breeding for endangered species. Conservation Biology 13:1487–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cody, M. L., and Overton, J. M.. 1996. Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant populations. Journal of Ecology 84:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crnokrak, P., and Roff, D. A.. 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260–270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, J., Baard, E. H. W., Harley, E. H., and O'Ryan, C.. 2002. Investigation of genetic diversity in fragmented geometric tortoise (Psammobates geometricus) populations. Conservation Genetics 3:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, S. J., J. A. Priddy, and J. R. Walters. 2000. Inbreeding in small populations of red-cockaded woodpeckers: insights from a spatially-explicit individual-based model. Pp. 129–147 in Young, A. G., and Clarke, G. M. (eds.) Genetics, Demography and Viability in Fragmented Populations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demauro, M. M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the Lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7:542–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. P., G. M. Mace, J. Poole, and R. A. Brett. 1992. Conservation biology: the ecology and genetics of endangered species. Pp. 405–430 in Berry, R. J., Crawford, T. J., and Hewitt, G. M. (eds.) Genes in Ecology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ebert, D., Haag, C., Kirkpatrick, M., et al. 2002. A selective advantage to immigrant genes in a Daphnia metapopulation. Science 295:485–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldridge, M. D. B., Kinnear, J. E., and Onus, M. L.. 2001. Source population of dispersing rock-wallabies (Petrogale lateralis) identified by assignment tests on multilocus genotypic data. Molecular Ecology 10:2867–2876CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Kassaby, Y. A., and Yanchuk, A. D.. 1994. Genetic diversity, differentiation, and inbreeding in Pacific yew from British Columbia. Journal of Heredity 85:112–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, D. A., Millar, C. I., and Olwell, M.. 1996. Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, S. H., and Hogg, J. T.. 1999. Assessing population structure at high levels of differentiation: microsatellite comparisons of bighorn sheep and large carnivores. Animal Conservation 2:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R. 1995. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research 66:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R. 1997. Do island populations have lower genetic variation than mainland populations?Heredity 78:311–327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankham, R. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conservation Biology 12:665–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., and Briscoe, D. A.. 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., and Briscoe, D. A.. 2004. A Primer of Conservation Genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Dorado, A. 2003. Tolerant versus sensitive genomes: the impact of deleterious mutation on fitness and conservation. Conservation Genetics 4:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, D. M., Woodworth, L. M., Montgomery, M. E., Briscoe, D. A., and Frankham, R.. 1997. Is mutation accumulation a threat to the survival of endangered populations?Conservation Biology 11:1235–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, S. M., and J. C. Avise. 1996. Avian conservation genetics. Pp. 160–189 in Avise, J. C., and Hamrick, J. L. (eds.) Conservation Genetics: Case Histories from Nature. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, K., and Lynch, M.. 2001. Metapopulation extinction caused by mutation accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:2928–2933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husband, B. C., and Schemske, D. W.. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, S. H. 1970. Complex hybridity in Isotoma petrea. Heredity 25:53–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulhavy, D. L., Hooper, R. G., and Costa, R.. 1995. Red-Cockaded Woodpecker: Recovery, Ecology and Management. Nacogdoches, TX: Center for Applied Studies, Stephen F. Austin State University.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conservation Biology 9:782–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., Conery, J., and Bürger, R.. 1995. Mutational meltdowns in sexual populations. Evolution 49:1067–1080CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margan, S. H., Nurthen, R. K., Montgomery, M. E., et al. 1998. Single large or several small? Population fragmentation in the captive management of endangered species. Zoo Biology 17:467–4803.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. A., Andelman, S. J., and Possingham, H. P.. 2003. Reliability of relative predictions in population viability analysis. Conservation Biology 17:982–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, D. R., J. K. Fischer, and J. D. Ballou. 1996. From bottleneck to metapopulation: recovery of the tule elk in California. Pp. 375–403 in McCullough, D. R. (ed.) Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Nei, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Neigel, J. E. 1996. Estimation of effective population size and migration parameters from genetic data. Pp. 329–346 in Smith, T. B., and Wayne, R. K. (eds.) Molecular Genetic Approaches in Conservation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, D., and Pilson, D.. 1997. Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella. Evolution 51:354–362CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, D., and Tallmon, D. A.. 2001. Experimental evidence for beneficial fitness effects of gene flow in recently isolated populations. Conservation Biology 15:1054–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, J. J., Brook, B. W., Reed, D. H., et al. 2006. Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biological Conservation in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, W. A., and Norman, J. A.. 1991. Conservation genetics of corroboree frogs, Pseudophryne corroboree Moore ED: Anura: Myobatrachidae: Population subdivision and genetic divergence. Australian Journal of Zoology 39:285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paetkau, D., Calvert, W., Stirling, I., and Strobeck, C.. 1995. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology 4:347–354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralls, K., Ballou, J. D., and Templeton, A.. 1988. Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conservation Biology 2:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D. H. 2004. Extinction risk in fragmented habitats. Animal Conservation 7:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D. H., and Frankham, R.. 2003. Population fitness is correlated with genetic diversity. Conservation Biology 17:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D. H., Lowe, E., Briscoe, D. A., and Frankham, R.. 2003. Inbreeding and extinction: effects of rate of inbreeding. Conservation Genetics 4:405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, C. M. 2000. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. American Naturalist 155:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossetto, M., Jezierski, G., Hopper, S. J., and Dixon, K. W.. 1999. Conservation genetics and clonality in two critically endangered eucalypts from the highly endemic south-western Australian flora. Biological Conservation 88:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saccheri, I. J., and Brakefield, P. M.. 2002. Rapid spread of immigrant genomes into inbred populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1073–1078CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saccheri, I., Kuussaari, M., Kankare, M., et al. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M. K., Mills, L. S., McKelvey, K. S., Ruggiero, L. F., and Allendorf, F. W.. 2002. DNA reveals high dispersal synchronizing the population dynamics of Canada lynx. Nature 415:520–522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slatkin, M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457–462Google ScholarPubMed
Spielman, D., and Frankham, R.. 1992. Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: improvement in reproductive fitness due to immigration of one individual into small partially inbred populations. Zoo Biology 11:343–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stangel, P. W., Lennartz, M. R., and Smith, M. H.. 1992. Genetic variation and population structure of red-cockaded woodpeckers. Conservation Biology 6:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, A. R. 1998. Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic data: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Molecular Ecology 7:381–397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tero, B., Aspi, J., Siikamaki, P., Jakalaniemi, A., and Tuomi, J.. 2003. Genetic structure and gene flow in a metapopulation of an endangered plant species, Silene tatarica. Molecular Ecology 12:2073–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilà, C., Sundqvist, A.-K., Flagstad, Ö., et al. 2003. Rescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf (Canis lupus) population by a single immigrant. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:91–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WCMC. 1992. Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
White, M. J. D. 1973. Animal Cytology and Evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, M. J. D. 1978. Modes of Speciation. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Woodworth, L. M., Montgomery, M. E., Briscoe, D. A., and Frankham, R.. 2002. Rapid genetic deterioration in captivity: causes and conservation implications. Conservation Genetics 3:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 2, The Theory of Gene Frequencies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Young, A. G., A. H. D. Brown, B. G. Murray, P. H. Thrall, and C. H. Miller. 2000. Genetic erosion, restricted mating and reduced viability in fragmented populations of the endangered grassland herb Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides. Pp. 335–359 in A. G. Young, and G. M. Clarke (eds.) Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zeyl, C., Mizesko, M., Arjan, J., and Visser, G. M.. 2001. Mutational meltdown in laboratory yeast populations. Evolution 55:909–917CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×