Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:18:18.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Permutation group algorithms via black box recognition algorithms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

William M. Kantor
Affiliation:
University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, U.S.A.
Ákos Seress
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.A.
C. M. Campbell
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
E. F. Robertson
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
N. Ruskuc
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
G. C. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Get access

Summary

Abstract

If a black box simple group is known to be isomorphic to a classical group over a field of known characteristic, a Las Vegas algorithm is used to produce an explicit isomorphism. This is used to upgrade all nearly linear time Monte Carlo permutation group algorithms to Las Vegas algorithms when the input group has no composition factor isomorphic to an exceptional group of Lie type or a 3–dimensional unitary group.

Key words and phrases: computational group theory, black box groups, classical groups, matrix group recognition

1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 20B40, 20G40; Secondary: 20P05, 68Q25, 68Q40

Introduction

There is a large library of nearly linear time permutation group algorithms [BCFS, BS, CF, LS, Mo, Ra, SchS, Ser]. Most of these are Monte Carlo (which means that the algorithm can return an incorrect answer, although the probability of that can be made as small as desired). The main result of this note is that Monte Carlo can be upgraded to Las Vegas (which means that the output is always correct, but the algorithm may also report failure, although the probability of that can be made as small as desired), whenever there are suitable recognition algorithms for the simple groups occurring as composition factors.

There is a growing literature of recognition algorithms for quasisimple groups of Lie type. The first of these, due to Neumann and Praeger [NP], solved the following problem: given a group G ≤ GL(d, q) by a set of generating matrices, decide whether G contains SL(d, q).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×