Andronova, N. G. and Schlesinger, M. E. (2001). Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research 106 (D19), 22 605–22 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrhenius, S. (1896). On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 41, 237–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, E. J. (1994). Chill over the Cretaceous. Nature 370, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boer, G. J. and Yu, B. (2003). Climate sensitivity and response. Climate Dynamics 20, 415–429; doi: 10.1007/s00382–002–0283–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budyko, M. I. (1972). Human's Impact on Climate. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat.Google Scholar

Budyko, M. I., Ronov, A. B. and Yanshin, A. L. (1987). The History of the Earth's Atmosphere. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cacuci, D. G. (1981). Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. I. Nonlinear functional analysis approach. Journal of Mathematical Physics 22, 2794–2802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cess, R. D., Zhang, M. H., Ingram, W. J.et al. (1996). Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: an update. Journal of Geophysical Research 101, 12 791–12 794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colman, R. A. (2003). A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models. Climate Dynamics 20, 865–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cubasch, U., Meehl, G. A., Boer, G. J. et al. (2001). Projections of future climate change. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 525–582.Google Scholar

Dessai, S. and Hulme, M. (2004). Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities?Climate Policy 4, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folland, C. K., Rayner, N. A.Brown, S. J.et al. (2001), Global temperature change and its uncertainties since 1861. Geophysical Research Letters 28, 2621–2624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R. and Webster, M. D. (2002). Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science 295, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fröhlich, C. and Lean, J. (1998). The Sun's total irradiance: cycles, trends and related climate change uncertainties since 1976. Geophysical Research Letters 25, 4377–4380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, J. M., Stouffer, R. J., Raper, S. C. B., Stott, P. A. and Rayner, N. A. (2002). An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity. Journal of Climate 15, 3117–3121.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, J. M., Ingram, W. J., Palmer, M. A.et al. (2004). A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity, Geophysical Research Letters 31, L03205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, M. C. G. (1986). Application of adjoint sensitivity theory to an atmospheric general circulation model. Journal of Atmospheric Science 43, 2644–2651.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, M. C. G., Cacuci, D. G. and Schlesinger, M. E. (1982). Sensitivity analysis of a radiative-convective model by the adjoint method. Journal of Atmospheric Science 39, 2038–2050.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffert, M. I. and Covey, C. (1992). Deriving global climate sensitivity from paleoclimate reconstructions. Nature 360, 573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

IPCC (1990). Scientific Assessment of Climate Change: Report of Working Group I, ed. Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J. and Ephraums, J. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Summary for Policymakers, Bracknell: UK Meteorological Office, IPCC/WMO/UNEP.Google Scholar

IPCC (1996). Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, J. T., Filho, L. G. Meira, Callander, B. A.et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, P. D. and Moberg, A. (2003). Hemispheric and large-scale surface air temperature variations: an extensive revision and an update to 2001. Journal of Climate 16, 206–223.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F. and Plattner, G. K. (2002). Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles. Nature 416, 719–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F. and Plattner, G. -K. (2003). Probabilistic climate change projections using neural networks. Climate Dynamics 21, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lean, J., Beer, J. and Bradley, R. (1995). Reconstruction of solar irradiance since 1610: Implications for climate change. Geophysical Research Letters 22 (23), 3195–3198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lempert, R. J. and Schlesinger, M. E. (2000). Robust strategies for abating climate change. Climatic Change 45 (3–4), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, M. E. and Jones, P. D. (2003). Global surface temperature over the past two millennia. Geophysical Research Letters 30, 1820; doi: 10.1029/2003GL017814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Möller, F. (1963). On the influence of changes in CO2 concentration in air on the radiative balance of the earth's surface and on the climate. Journal of Geophysical Research 68, 3877–3886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, M. G. and Keith, D. (1995). Subjective judgments by climate experts. Environmental Science & Technology 29, 468A–476A.Google ScholarPubMed

Murphy, J. M. (1995). Transient response of the Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere model to increasing carbon dioxide. Part III: Analysis of global-mean response using simple models. Journal of Climate 8, 496–514.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, J. M. and Mitchell, J. F. B. (1995). Transient response of the Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere model to increasing carbon dioxide. Part II: Spatial and temporal structure of response. Journal of Climate 8, 57–80.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H.Barnett, D. N.et al. (2004). Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430, 768–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J., Shine, K. P. and Stordal, F. (1998). New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases. Geophysical Research Letters 25, 2715–2718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

NAS (1979). Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. Washington, DC: US National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Newell, R. E. and Dopplick, T. G. (1979). Questions concerning the possible influence of anthropogenic CO2 on atmospheric temperature. Journal of Applied Meteorology 18, 822–825.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, G. (1981). Energy balance climate models. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics 19, 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pielke, R. A. Jr. (2001). Room for doubt. Nature 410, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozanov, E., Schlesinger, M. E., Andronova, N. G.et al. (2002a). Climate/chemistry effects of the Pinatubo volcanic eruption simulated by the UIUC stratosphere/troposphere GCM with interactive photochemistry. Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (D21), 4594, doi: 10.1029/2001JD000974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozanov, E., Schlesinger, M. E. and Zubov, V. A. (2002b). The University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign three-dimensional stratosphere-troposphere general circulation model with interactive ozone photochemistry: fifteen-year control run climatology. Journal of Geophysical Research 106 (D21), 27 233–27 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozanov, E., Schlesinger, M. E., Egorova, T. A.et al. (2004). Atmospheric response to the observed increase of solar UV radiation from solar minimum to solar maximum simulated by the UIUC climate-chemistry model. Journal of Geophysical Research 109, D01110, doi: 10.1029/2003JD003796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruddiman, W. F. (2000). Earth's Climate, Past and Future. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, M. E. (1985). Feedback analysis of results from energy balance and radiative-convective models. In The Potential Climatic Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide, ed. MacCracken, M. C. and Luther, F. M.. US Department of Energy, pp. 280–319.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, M. E. (1988). Quantitative analysis of feedbacks in climate model simulations of CO2-induced warming. In Greenhouse-Gas-Induced Climatic Change: A Critical Appraisal of Simulations and Observations, ed. Schlesinger, M. E.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 653–737.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, M. E. (1989). Quantitative analysis of feedbacks in climate model simulations. In Understanding Climate Change, ed. Berger, A., Dickinson, R. E. and Kidson, J. W.. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, pp. 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sellers, W. D. (1969). A global climate model based on the energy balance of the earth–atmosphere system. Journal of Applied Meteorology 8, 392–400.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shlyakhter, A. I. (1994). Uncertainty estimates in scientific models: lessons from trends in physical measurements, population and energy projections. In Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis: Theory and Applications, ed. Ayyub, B. M. and Gupta, M. M.. North-Holland: Elsevier Scientific Publishers, pp. 477–496.Google Scholar

Somerville, R. C. J. and Remer, L. A. (1984). Cloud optical thickness feedbacks in the CO2 climate problem. Journal of Geophysical Research 89, 9668–9672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stainforth, D. A., Aina1, T.Christensen, C.et al. (2005). Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433, 403–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tol, R. S. J. and Vos, A. D. (1998). A Bayesian statistical analysis of the enhanced greenhouse effect. Climatic Change 38, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sluijs, J., Eijndhoven, J., Shackley, S. and Wynne, B. (1998). Anchoring devices in science for policy: the case of consensus around climate sensitivity. Social Studies of Science 28, 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, W. -C. and Stone, P. H. (1980). Effect of ice-albedo feedback on global sensitivity in a one-dimensional radiative-convective model. Journal of Atmospheric Science 37, 545–552.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Washington, W. M. and Meehl, G. A. (1983). General circulation model experiments on the climatic effects due to a doubling and quadrupling of carbon dioxide concentration. Journal of Geophysical Research 88, 6600–6610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wetherald, R. T. and Manabe, S. (1988). Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. Journal of Atmospheric Science 45, 1397–1415.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, C. A., and Mitchell, J. F. B. (1987). A doubled CO2 climate sensitivity experiment with a global climate model including a simple ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 92, 13 315–13 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yang, F., and Schlesinger, M. E. (2002). On the surface and atmospheric temperature changes following the 1991 Pinatubo volcanic eruption: A GCM study. Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (D8); doi: 10.1029/2001JD000373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yang, F., Schlesinger, M. E. and Rozanov, E. (2000). Description and performance of the UIUC 24-layer stratosphere/troposphere general circulation model. Journal of Geophysical Research 105 (D14), 17 925–17 954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yohe, G., Andronova, N. and Schlesinger, M. (2004). To hedge or not to hedge against an uncertain climate future. Science 305, 5695.Google Scholar