The efficacy of a serum carboxyterminal pyridinoline cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen as a quantitative screening marker for bone metastases in patients with urological malignancies
Introduction
Bone metastasis is a frequent event with various malignancies and is a significant clinical problem in advanced cases, associated with pain and pathological bone fractures. In the urological field, prostate cancer is well known to metastasize selectively to bone, but this site may also be frequently involved with other urological malignancies. Therefore, detecting and monitoring bone metastases are very important regarding treatment of these cancers.
Bone scintigraphy combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered to be the most sensitive and non-invasive technique for detection of bone metastasis. However, these imaging techniques are both quite expensive, and are not accurate for comparison purposes. Moreover, bone scintigraphy detects not only active metastatic lesions, but also healing processes after treatment of bone metastases.
In contrast, blood sampling for analysis of serum markers is very simple and well tolerated for repeated checks. ALP activity, osteocalcin, and many kinds of markers of bone metastases in blood have therefore been employed, but none has so far proven to be really clinically useful [1], [2], [3].
Bone metastasis is quite different from other metastases regarding its unique pattern of development, which consists of multiple and complex sequential steps, as noted by Yoneda in his description of mechanisms of cellular and molecular bone metastasis from breast and prostate cancers [4]. Clearly, if some specific substance involved in bone metabolism demonstrate altered levels, it should be possible to apply this for early detection and assess early treatment effects.
Telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) has for several years been widely used for detecting bone metastases in lung and breast cancer cases [5], [6], [7], and is also well recognized to have utility for prostatic cancers [8], [9], [10]. It is documented to be a serum marker of bone collagen degradation [11], [12], [13]. However, there have been almost no reports on ICTP regarding urothelial or kidney cancers which are relatively commonly associated with bone metastasis. Therefore, we compared clinical results for bone metastasis and serum concentrations of ICTP in patients with such urological malignancies.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
From April 1999 to July 2000, we experienced a total of 210 cases of histopathologically proven urological malignancies (prostatic cancer: 119 cases; urothelial cancer: 68 cases; kidney cancer: 23 cases) in Nagoya City University and affiliated hospitals. Of the 119 prostatic cancer patients, 9 were untreated, and the remainder under-went radical prostatectomy, hormone therapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of these treatments. Of the 68 urothelial cancers, 9 were untreated, and the rest
Results
The overall results for prostate and non-prostate cancers are summarized in Fig. 1. In both cases, significant elevation was evident in ICTP values for cases with metastases. Similar results were obtained with ALP and PSA for prostate, and with one exception, ALP with other urothelial malignancies. Because of the relatively small numbers, urothelial and kidney cancers were combined as one non-prostate cancer group.
In prostate cancer patients, the areas under the ROC curves and corresponding
Discussion
The results of the present study indicate that serum ICTP may have superior or equal efficacy to ALP for prediction of bone metastases from prostate and urothelial malignancies. It has been well documented that ICTP is useful for this purpose with prostate cancer cases (Kylmälä et al. [8]). In fact, it was earlier also proposed as a serum marker for multiple myeloma (Elomaa et al. [16]) and bone collagen degradation (Risteli et al. [13]).
Regarding the statistical treatment of our results, it is
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Mr. Yoshikazu Nakao, Chugai Diagnostics Science Co. Ltd. for statistical analyses, and Dr. Malcolm Moore for reviewing the English language of our manuscript.
References (18)
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of breast and prostate cancer metastasis to bone
Eur. J. Cancer
(1998)- et al.
Evaluation of the effect of oral clodronate on skeletal metastases with type I collagen metabolites: a controlled trial of the Finnish prostate cancer group
Eur. J. Cancer
(1993) - et al.
Correlation between bone metabolic markers and bone scan in prostatic cancer
J. Urol.
(1997) - et al.
Bone alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme and urinary hydroxyproline in healthy subjects, patients with osteolytic metastasis, and patients with primary hyperparathyroidism
Neoplasia
(1989) - et al.
Biochemical prediction of response of bone metastases to treatment
Br. J. Cancer
(1988) - et al.
Assay of urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline as potential markers of the rate bone resorption: usefulness of urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline in patients with prostate cancer with bone metastasis
Jpn. J. Urol.
(1994) - et al.
Serum concentrations of type I collagen carboxyterminal telopeptide (ICTP) and type I procollagen carboxy- and aminoterminal propeptides (PIPC, PINP) as markers of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer
Anticancer Res.
(1996) - et al.
Bone metabolic markers in bone metastasis of breast cancer
Int. J. Clin. Oncol.
(1999) - et al.
Usefulness of serum carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) as a marker of bone metastasis from lung cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.
(2000)
Cited by (4)
Biochemical markers in oncology. Part I: Molecular basis. Part II: Clinical uses
2007, Cancer Treatment ReviewsUse of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis
2008, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine