Transoral placement of rigid fixation following sagittal ramus split osteotomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(89)80088-6Get rights and content

References (0)

Cited by (24)

  • Three-dimensional evaluation of distal and proximal segment skeletal relapse following isolated mandibular advancement surgery in 100 consecutive patients: A one-year follow-up study

    2022, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    All surgeries were performed by the same team of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Following osteotomy and achievement of the final occlusion, rigid fixation and stabilization was accomplished with two KLS Martin mini-osteosynthesis plates (KLS Martin GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) and monocortical screws on both sides, as suggested by Tulasne and Schendel.21 Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired for each patient at three time-points: preoperatively (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and at the 1-year follow-up (T2).

  • Quantitative appraisal of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy impact on the loading of temporomandibular joint

    2020, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    As an alternative, fixation with monocortical screws and one or two metal miniplates may be performed. This procedure is especially indicated in pronounced mandibular advancements and offers the clinical advantages of smaller torques in the area of the proximal segment as well as lower rates of direct or indirect (compression between segments) injury of the neurovascular bundle (Olivera et al., 2012; Tulasne and Schendel, 1989; Turvey, and Hall, 1986). The health of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is of great importance for stable results in orthognathic surgery (Bermell-Baviera et al., 2016).

  • TMJ surgery following orthognathic surgery: A case series

    2018, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases
  • Plate removal following orthognathic surgery

    2011, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology
    Citation Excerpt :

    After completing the osteotomies on both sides in the lower jaw, a wafer was introduced onto the lower jaw, and intermaxillary fixation was ensured. Internal fixation was established with titanium miniplates and monocortical screws of the 2.0 system, as described by Tulasne and Schendel16 (Fig. 1). Almost all of the miniplates used, with the exception of 12 Tekka-plates (Tekka, Brignais, France), were from the Leibinger miniplate system (Leibinger, Tuttlingen, Germany).

  • Occurrence of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy

    2010, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology
    Citation Excerpt :

    After finishing the osteotomies at both sides in the lower jaw, a wafer was introduced on the lower jaw and intermaxillary fixation was ensured. Subsequently, rigid fixation with miniplates was established as described by Tulasne and Schendel.13 No intermaxillary fixation was used, except for light elastics on surgical hooks to guide the patient into the correct occlusion during jaw movements.

  • Comparative Study Between Resorbable and Nonresorbable Plates in Orthognathic Surgery

    2010, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Many studies have also been reported regarding the method of intraoperative fixation. Many investigators18,19 reported on the methods using a miniplate, rather than a screw, by way of an intraoral route to fix the bone fragments. These methods make it easy to attach a miniplate between the bone fragments, minimizing the change in the location of the mandibular condyle and compression of the inferior alveolar nerve.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text