Soil Arthropod Sampling
References (77)
- et al.
Biometrika
(1950)- et al.
Acarologia
(1960) - et al.
An Introduction to Acarology
(1952) Zool. Anz.
(1938)J. Anim. Ecol.
(1956)Redia
(1905)Redia
(1921)- et al.
Biometrics
(1953)
Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere
J. Anim. Ecol.
Soil Sci.
Ecology
The ecology of the soil fauna of a rain forest with special reference to the amphipod, Talitrus sylvaticus Haswell
J. Ecol.
The ecology of small predatory beetles, with special reference to their competitive relations
Pedobiologia
Ent. exp. et appl.
Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser.
Ecology
Biomet. Bull.
J. Anim. Ecol.
Medd. Skogsforsk. Inst. Stockh.
Rev. suisse Zool.
J. Anim. Ecol.
Oikos
Ecology
Ecology
Ent. mon. Mag.
Soil Zoology. Proceedings of the University of Nottingham Second Easter School in Agricultural Science
Vie et Milieu
Cited by (53)
In-situ <sup>13</sup>CO<inf>2</inf> labeling to trace carbon fluxes in plant-soil-microorganism systems: Review and methodological guideline
2021, RhizosphereCitation Excerpt :Macrofauna can be manually collected from soil samples (Irmler, 2000). The Tullgren method involves heat extraction in a Macfadyen apparatus and is often used to separate and extract microfauna and mesofauna (MacFadyen, 1962; Irmler, 2000; Pollierer et al., 2012). The soil fauna are washed with distilled water and stored at 8 °C for 48 h so that the gut is evacuated because the intestinal contents may confound the isotope analysis (Haines and Montague, 1979; Albers et al., 2006).
A DNA metabarcoding approach to characterize soil arthropod communities
2018, Soil Biology and BiochemistryCitation Excerpt :The morphological identification of soil arthropods is time consuming (Bienert et al., 2012; Querner and Bruckner, 2010) and usually requires significant taxonomic expertise as the diversity is often difficult to characterize due to morphological ambiguity and cryptic diversity (e.g. André et al., 2001; Smith et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2012). Further, there are known biases in the methods commonly used for extraction of arthropod communities (André et al., 2002; Edwards, 1991) and extraction efficiency varies for different taxa across soil types and under different extraction conditions (André et al., 2002; Macfadyen, 1962). These challenges can constrain efforts to characterize soil arthropod communities, particularly when seeking to analyze a larger number of soils in a relatively short period of time or when taxonomic expertise is lacking (Querner and Bruckner, 2010).
From peds to paradoxes: Linkages between soil biota and their influences on ecological processes
2008, Soil Biology and BiochemistryClimatic and litter fall effects on collembolan and oribatid mite species and communities in a beech wood based on a 7 years investigation
2006, European Journal of Soil BiologyCitation Excerpt :Oppioidea oribatids were not determined to the species level. The Ol-layer and the Of-layers were collected in a 0.1 m2 frame and subsequently extracted in a Macfadyen-apparatus [21]. The Ah-layer was sampled up to 4 cm depth taking a 0.03 m2 soil core; soil fauna was subsequently extracted in a Macfadyen-aparatus, as well.