Decomposition of Pinus sylvestris litter in litter bags: Influence of underlying native litter layer
References (31)
Response of soils to climate change
Advances in Ecological Research
(1992)- et al.
Fungal biomass and nitrogen in decomposing Scots pine needle litter
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
(1979) - et al.
Metabolic and faunal activity in litters of three mixtures compared with pure stands
Agriculture, Ecosystems and the Environment
(1988) - et al.
Effect of urban heavy metal pollution on organic matter decomposition in Quercus ilex L. woods
Environmental Pollution
(1995) - et al.
Sulphite and pH effects on CO2 evolution from angiospermous and coniferous tree leaf litters
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
(1993) - et al.
Cellulose, lignin and nitrogen levels in rate regulating factors in late stages of forest litter decomposition
Pedobiologia
(1987) Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials
(1989)- et al.
Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality
Biogeochemistry
(1993) - et al.
Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter II. Influence of chemical composition
Ecological Bulletins
(1980) - et al.
Decay rates, nitrogen fluxes and decomposer communities of single- and mixed-species foliar litter
Ecology
(1990)
The disappearance of leaf litter under different woodland conditions
Plant and Soil
Nitrogen availability beneath pure spruce and mixed larch and spruce stands growing on a deep peat. I. Net mineralisation measured by field and laboratory incubation
Plant and Soil
Larch litter and nitrogen availability in mixed larch-spruce stands. II. A comparison of larch and spruce litters as a nitrogen source for Sitka spruce seedlings
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Increased atmospheric CO2 and litter quality: decomposition of sweet chestnut leaf litter with animal food webs of different complexities
Oikos
Apparent controls of mass loss rate of leaf litter on a regional scale
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Cited by (54)
Litterfall and leaf litter decomposition in a central African tropical mountain forest and Eucalyptus plantation
2014, Forest Ecology and ManagementCitation Excerpt :Most litter quality indicators marginally differ between CG and PE. Hence, the difference in decomposition between CG and PE is likely explained by the higher Ca content in CG (Chadwick et al., 1998; Hobbie et al., 2006; Davey et al., 2007; Ngao et al., 2009). An additional factor explaining the relatively low decomposition of Eucalyptus litter is its high polyphenol content (Berg and Laskowski, 2006).
Tree species effects on nutrient cycling and soil biota: A feedback mechanism favouring species coexistence
2013, Forest Ecology and ManagementCitation Excerpt :For instance, Reich et al. (2005) and Hobbie et al.(2006) showed that tree species affected leaf-fall decomposition through variation in leaf-fall quality, soil temperature and earthworm community. Chadwick et al. (1998) observed that leaf-fall decay rate was influenced by the nutrient content of the layer of litter on which leaf-fall was incubated. Recently Vesterdal et al. (2012) correlated the leaf-fall quality (N, Ca and Mg) and microclimatic conditions generated by five deciduous tree species with forest floor C turnover rates.
Nitrogen availability affects saprotrophic basidiomycetes decomposing pine needles in a long term laboratory study
2011, Fungal EcologyCitation Excerpt :Likewise, fungal N translocation to high C:N ratio substrata may increase the fungal activity in N limited substratum. Net increases in the amount of N in litter during early stages of decay have been observed repeatedly (Berg & Staaf 1981; Berg et al. 1982; Fahey et al. 1985; Melillo et al. 1989; Chadwick et al. 1998; Moore et al. 2006). Net gain of N is typically associated with more recalcitrant litter types with low initial N content, and N import has been hypothesized as a strategy of fungi to overcome N limitation in the newly shed litter (Lindahl & Boberg 2008).
Litter decomposition in Mediterranean ecosystems: Modelling the controlling role of climatic conditions and litter quality
2011, Applied Soil EcologyCitation Excerpt :Undecomposed litters were analyzed for content of total water soluble substances, organic C and lignin, as reported in Fioretto et al. (2005) and Virzo De Santo et al. (1993). Cellulose content was measured only in leaf litters (Fioretto et al., 2005), whereas cellulose content of needle litters was obtained from literature data (Chadwick et al., 1998, for P. sylvestris; Chadwick et al., 1998; Ibrahima et al., 1995; Sariyildiz et al., 2005 for species closely related to A. alba, P. pinea and P. laricio). Decomposition was determined by measuring litter mass loss.
Carbon input belowground is the major C flux contributing to leaf litter mass loss: Evidences from a <sup>13</sup>C labelled-leaf litter experiment
2010, Soil Biology and BiochemistryCitation Excerpt :The quantification of these major C fluxes contributing to litter decomposition has not yet been applied to the same sample due to the intrinsic complexity of the decomposition process and the limitations of the prevailing technical approach, i.e. litterbags (Bocock and Gilbert, 1957), widely used to measure litter mass loss and calculate litter decay rates (Gholz et al., 2000). Litterbags are useful in decomposition experiments as they confine the litter and prevent contamination from new litter inputs (Adair et al., 2008; Chadwick et al., 1998; Smith and Bradford, 2003; Yamashita and Takeda, 1998). However, they can fundamentally alter the decomposition environment by influencing natural interactions with soil macrofauna, for instance (Smith and Bradford, 2003; St. John, 1980), an effect demonstrated to be dependent on bag mesh size (Bradford et al., 2002; St. John, 1980).
Effect of litter quality on its decomposition in broadleaf and coniferous forest
2008, European Journal of Soil BiologyCitation Excerpt :Many different results have been reported from litter mixing, including neutral [4], positive [9] and negative effects [13], even within the same study [22,35]. Some studies [2,6,32] have revealed that high quality litter promotes decomposition of poor quality litter while poor quality litter retards decomposition of high quality litters. Other researchers have suggested that litter from a broadleaf tree decomposed faster in ‘broadleaf habitats’ than in ‘coniferous habitats’, but there is no difference in the decomposition of coniferous litter based on habitat [34].
- 1
Present address: Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, BBSRC North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, U.K. Tel: +44 1837 82558; fax: +44 1837 82139