Decomposition of Pinus sylvestris litter in litter bags: Influence of underlying native litter layer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00090-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Pinus sylvestris (L.) litter confined in 1-mm mesh litter bags was incubated on layers of either P. sylvestris or Picea abies (Dietra.) litter of different origins (native litters) under standard conditions in the laboratory. The decomposition rate of the confined litter was measured both as evolution of CO2 and as mass loss. The native litter played an important part in governing the rate of decomposition of the confined litter, with the native litters richest in N and Ca resulting in greater decomposition rates (up to 15% more) of the confined litter than the nutrient poor native litters. Both inter- and intra-species effects were observed and these are discussed in terms of chemical and physical interactions between the confined and native litters.

References (31)

  • K.L. Bocock et al.

    The disappearance of leaf litter under different woodland conditions

    Plant and Soil

    (1957)
  • J.C. Carlyle et al.

    Nitrogen availability beneath pure spruce and mixed larch and spruce stands growing on a deep peat. I. Net mineralisation measured by field and laboratory incubation

    Plant and Soil

    (1986)
  • J.C. Carlyle et al.

    Larch litter and nitrogen availability in mixed larch-spruce stands. II. A comparison of larch and spruce litters as a nitrogen source for Sitka spruce seedlings

    Canadian Journal of Forest Research

    (1986)
  • M.M. Couteaux et al.

    Increased atmospheric CO2 and litter quality: decomposition of sweet chestnut leaf litter with animal food webs of different complexities

    Oikos

    (1991)
  • M.L. Dyer et al.

    Apparent controls of mass loss rate of leaf litter on a regional scale

    Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

    (1990)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Litterfall and leaf litter decomposition in a central African tropical mountain forest and Eucalyptus plantation

      2014, Forest Ecology and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most litter quality indicators marginally differ between CG and PE. Hence, the difference in decomposition between CG and PE is likely explained by the higher Ca content in CG (Chadwick et al., 1998; Hobbie et al., 2006; Davey et al., 2007; Ngao et al., 2009). An additional factor explaining the relatively low decomposition of Eucalyptus litter is its high polyphenol content (Berg and Laskowski, 2006).

    • Tree species effects on nutrient cycling and soil biota: A feedback mechanism favouring species coexistence

      2013, Forest Ecology and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, Reich et al. (2005) and Hobbie et al.(2006) showed that tree species affected leaf-fall decomposition through variation in leaf-fall quality, soil temperature and earthworm community. Chadwick et al. (1998) observed that leaf-fall decay rate was influenced by the nutrient content of the layer of litter on which leaf-fall was incubated. Recently Vesterdal et al. (2012) correlated the leaf-fall quality (N, Ca and Mg) and microclimatic conditions generated by five deciduous tree species with forest floor C turnover rates.

    • Nitrogen availability affects saprotrophic basidiomycetes decomposing pine needles in a long term laboratory study

      2011, Fungal Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Likewise, fungal N translocation to high C:N ratio substrata may increase the fungal activity in N limited substratum. Net increases in the amount of N in litter during early stages of decay have been observed repeatedly (Berg & Staaf 1981; Berg et al. 1982; Fahey et al. 1985; Melillo et al. 1989; Chadwick et al. 1998; Moore et al. 2006). Net gain of N is typically associated with more recalcitrant litter types with low initial N content, and N import has been hypothesized as a strategy of fungi to overcome N limitation in the newly shed litter (Lindahl & Boberg 2008).

    • Litter decomposition in Mediterranean ecosystems: Modelling the controlling role of climatic conditions and litter quality

      2011, Applied Soil Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Undecomposed litters were analyzed for content of total water soluble substances, organic C and lignin, as reported in Fioretto et al. (2005) and Virzo De Santo et al. (1993). Cellulose content was measured only in leaf litters (Fioretto et al., 2005), whereas cellulose content of needle litters was obtained from literature data (Chadwick et al., 1998, for P. sylvestris; Chadwick et al., 1998; Ibrahima et al., 1995; Sariyildiz et al., 2005 for species closely related to A. alba, P. pinea and P. laricio). Decomposition was determined by measuring litter mass loss.

    • Carbon input belowground is the major C flux contributing to leaf litter mass loss: Evidences from a <sup>13</sup>C labelled-leaf litter experiment

      2010, Soil Biology and Biochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The quantification of these major C fluxes contributing to litter decomposition has not yet been applied to the same sample due to the intrinsic complexity of the decomposition process and the limitations of the prevailing technical approach, i.e. litterbags (Bocock and Gilbert, 1957), widely used to measure litter mass loss and calculate litter decay rates (Gholz et al., 2000). Litterbags are useful in decomposition experiments as they confine the litter and prevent contamination from new litter inputs (Adair et al., 2008; Chadwick et al., 1998; Smith and Bradford, 2003; Yamashita and Takeda, 1998). However, they can fundamentally alter the decomposition environment by influencing natural interactions with soil macrofauna, for instance (Smith and Bradford, 2003; St. John, 1980), an effect demonstrated to be dependent on bag mesh size (Bradford et al., 2002; St. John, 1980).

    • Effect of litter quality on its decomposition in broadleaf and coniferous forest

      2008, European Journal of Soil Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many different results have been reported from litter mixing, including neutral [4], positive [9] and negative effects [13], even within the same study [22,35]. Some studies [2,6,32] have revealed that high quality litter promotes decomposition of poor quality litter while poor quality litter retards decomposition of high quality litters. Other researchers have suggested that litter from a broadleaf tree decomposed faster in ‘broadleaf habitats’ than in ‘coniferous habitats’, but there is no difference in the decomposition of coniferous litter based on habitat [34].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, BBSRC North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, U.K. Tel: +44 1837 82558; fax: +44 1837 82139

    View full text