Elsevier

Metabolism

Volume 47, Issue 11, November 1998, Pages 1379-1382
Metabolism

Body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: Comparison of prone and supine measurements

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0495(98)90309-2Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess whether changes in the interposition of body compartments affect the results of body composition measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the fan-beam mode. Thirty healthy subjects underwent two sequential measurements: the first was performed in the supine position as described by the manufacturer, and the second in the prone position. Estimates of body composition were compared between the two measurements. Mean body weight did not differ between measurements ([mean ± SD] supine v prone, 68.561 ± 12.461 v 68.589 ± 12.469 kg). Mean bone mineral content (BMC) was lower in the prone position versus the supine position. When the head was excluded, this difference reached statistical significance (supine v prone, 1,738 ± 361 v 1,688 ± 380 g, P = .0001). The mean fat tissue mass (FTM) was lower and lean tissue mass (LTM) higher in the prone measurements. When the head was excluded, the mean FTM difference between the two measurements became greater (FTM supine v prone, 25.129 ± 10.445 v 24.030 ± 10.388 kg, P = .0001; LTM supine v prone, 37.309 ± 9.357 v 38.246 ± 9.150 kg, P = .0001). It is concluded that the positioning of the patient on the examination table affects DEXA body composition measurements by the fan-beam mode. This could imply a lack of accuracy of the method, which may be due to subtle changes in regional tissue depth and fat distribution caused by patient repositioning.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can be used to predict live animal and whole carcass composition of sheep

    2011, Small Ruminant Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The sheep carcass was also scanned prone but with the front legs outstretched due to positioning of the legs after hanging. Interestingly, Lambrinoudaki et al. (1998) found that DXA derived FTM and BMC were lower while DXA-derived LTM was higher when humans were scanned in the prone rather than supine position which may explain some of the findings discussed below. Regardless, the present data suggest that live sheep can be scanned in a prone position and excellent estimates of whole body, empty body and carcass composition can be obtained regardless of the scanning grid employed, provided appropriate correction algorithms are used.

  • Reproducibility of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry total and regional body composition measurements using different scanning positions and definitions of regions

    2009, Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, the software handles tissue adjacent, above, and below bone using a specific interpolation system to identify bone pixels when calculating BMD for the whole body. Lambrinoudaki et al [13] compared changes in the mean values of body composition in supine and prone positions and found differences in the observed measurement values. Furthermore, in our study, there was more variation between repeated values in supine-prone than in supine-supine measurements.

  • Assessing Agreement of Lateral Leg Muscle and Bone Composition Using Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

    2020, Journal of Clinical Densitometry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Posthoc analyses within the current study revealed a strong correlation between leg percent fat and mean differences in (1) fat mass (r = 0.669–0.796) and (2) lean mass (r = −0.703 to −0.717) between lateral and frontal scan views. This observation suggests leg fat mass amount may affect fat distribution and tissue depth between scan views, as previously suggested (31,32). Thus, the inability to draw separate ROI lines during postscan analyses when using the Hologic Horizon A, in addition to a potential magnification effect using this fan-beam scanner, may have limited the ability to account for fat distribution differences between lateral and frontal views, thereby decreasing lateral view measurement accuracy.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text