Molecular Therapy
Volume 11, Issue 5, May 2005, Pages 695-706
Journal home page for Molecular Therapy

Article
A direct comparison of two nonviral gene therapy vectors for somatic integration: in vivo evaluation of the bacteriophage integrase ϕC31 and the Sleeping Beauty transposase

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.01.010Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open archive

Abstract

In this study we performed a head-to-head comparison of the integrase ϕC31 derived from a Streptomyces phage and the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposase, a member of the TC1/mariner superfamily of transposable elements. Mouse liver was cotransfused with a vector containing our most robust human coagulation factor IX expression cassette and the appropriate recombinase recognition site and either a ϕC31- or a SB transposase-expressing vector. To analyze transgene persistence and to prove somatic integration in vivo we induced cell cycling of mouse hepatocytes and found that the transgene expression levels dropped by only 16 to 21% and 56 to 66% in mice that received ϕC31 and SB, respectively. Notably, no difference in the toxicity profile was detected in mice treated with either recombinase. Moreover we observed that with the integrase-mediated gene transfer, transgene expression levels were dependent on the remaining noncoding vector sequences, which also integrate into the host genome. Further analyses of a hot spot of integration after ϕC31-mediated integration revealed small chromosomal deletions at the target site and that the recombination process was not dependent on the orientation in which the ϕC31 recognition site attached to the pseudo-recognition sites in the host genome. Coupled together with ongoing improvements in both systems this study suggests that both nonviral vector systems will have important roles in achieving stable gene transfer in vivo.

Keywords

Sleeping Beauty
bacteriophage integrase
ϕC31
nonviral
hemophilia
gene therapy

Cited by (0)