Retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer: Prognostic factors and treatment outcome
Introduction
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fourth most common cause of death in females. Every year 220,000 women develop EOC worldwide. Lack of reliable early detection method and late presentation at diagnosis contribute to the high mortality rate of ovarian cancer [1]. Treatment at presentation includes surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. The desired surgical outcome in advanced stage disease is complete cytoreduction, i.e. no macroscopic disease at the end of surgery. These optimally debulked patients benefit a 60% five-year survival, compared to only 30% with a residual tumor of up to 1 cm at the end of the surgery [2]. Lymph node (LN) sampling is part of the staging procedure, and removal of enlarged or suspicious lymph nodes is important for cytoreduction, but systematic lymphadenectomy during primary debulking surgery does not improve overall survival [3]. When optimal debulking is not possible, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking is acceptable [4].
Although most patients respond to treatment with platinum and taxane combination chemotherapy, many patients who present with advanced disease will experience recurrence within 18 months [5]. Most recurrences will be intra-abdominal, 13%–37% will involve intraperitoneal (IP) and retroperitoneal LN (RLN) metastases, and in 3–34% isolated LN recurrences are diagnosed, mostly para-aortic [[6], [7], [8], [9]]. Lymphatic spread was shown to be related to a more indolent course of disease. Patients with apparent stage I disease at diagnosis who were upstaged to stage IIIC due to RLN metastases, had a higher 5-year survival rate compared to patients with IP stage IIIC disease (58–84% and 18–36% respectively) [[10], [11], [12], [13]]. At recurrence, isolated RLN metastasis was also found to have favourable survival [7,8,[14], [15], [16]] especially if surgically resected during secondary cytoreduction [16,17]. However, a recently published study did not show survival benefit with secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone, in recurrent EOC, regardless of recurrence site [18].
LN recurrence, even if localized, is considered a systemic relapse and usually treated by chemotherapy. There is lack of data in the literature regarding the outcome of chemotherapy without secondary debulking in patients with different sites of recurrence. The aim of the present study is to compare response to chemotherapy and survival in patients with retroperitoneal versus intraperitoneal recurrence.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The medical records of patients diagnosed with ovarian, primary peritoneal or tubal cancer, who were treated and followed at the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Israel, between 2000 and 2015, were retrospectively reviewed. The data collected included: date of diagnosis, histology, grade, stage, BRCA carrier status, type of surgery (primary debulking or interval), presence of residual disease at the end of the surgery, chemotherapy regimen and number of cycles, platinum sensitivity, date of
Results
During the study period, 249 patients were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancer. Fifty-nine (23.6%) patients were excluded due to non-recurrent disease, 38 (15.2%) patients were excluded due to refusal to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, 9 (3.6%) patients due to lack of information regarding the recurrence site, and 8 (3.2%) patients did not meet the inclusion criteria due to parenchymatic recurrence (liver, spleen, pulmonary, brain).
Overall, 135 patients met the
Discussion
In the present study, we compared the outcome of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancer according to the site of recurrence; intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal LN and combined relapse. Consistent with previous studies [7,8,21], we found that patients with isolated LN recurrent disease have longer PRS and OS compared to patients with intraperitoneal recurrence. At the time of diagnosis, RLN metastases will be found in 50–70% of patients [8]. However, an
Author contribution
Levy Tally: Conceptualization, Supervision, Software, Methodology. Migdan Zohar: Investigation, Data curation, Visualization. Aleohin Natalie: Investigation, Data curation. Ben-Shem Erez: Resources, Writing - Review & Editing. Peled Ofri: Resources, Writing - Review & Editing. Tal Ori: Resources, Writing - Review & Editing. Elyashiv Osnat: Writing - Original Draft, Resources.
Acknowledgments
This work was performed in partial fulfilment of the MD thesis requirements of the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.
References (23)
- et al.
Ovarian cancer
Lancet (London, England)
(2014) - et al.
The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(1994) - et al.
Chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer
Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.
(2017) - et al.
Gynecologic oncology the clinical outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer patients with apparently isolated lymph node recurrence: a multicenter retrospective Italian study
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2010) - et al.
Isolated lymph node relapse of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2007) - et al.
Ovarian cancer patients with localized relapse: clinical outcome and prognostic factors
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2013) - et al.
Ovarian cancer patients with “node-positive-only” stage IIIC disease have a more favorable outcome than stage IIIA/B
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2007) - et al.
Is it justified to classify patients to stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only?
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2006) - et al.
The validity and significance of substage IIIC by node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of nodal metastasis on patient survival
Gynecol. Oncol.
(1999) - et al.
Secondary cytoreductive surgery for isolated nodal recurrence in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2007)