ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Gynecologic Oncology
Volume 106, Issue 2, August 2007, Pages 305-310
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (182 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.02.018    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

UCN-01 in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: A study of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II consortium

Stephen Welcha, Hal W. Hirteb, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Mark S. Careyc, Sebastian J. Hotteb, Ming-Sound Tsaoa, Shirley Browna, Gregory R. Ponda, Janet E. Danceyd and Amit M. Ozaa

aPrincess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M56 2M9 bJuravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession St., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8V 5C2 cLondon Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4L6 dCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20852, USA

Received 31 October 2006. 
Available online 29 May 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Background and objective

UCN-01 is a staurosporine analogue shown to abrogate the G2 checkpoint through inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases. Preclinical evidence suggests synergy between UCN-01 and cytotoxic chemotherapy. Topotecan is an active agent in ovarian cancer. This phase II study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of topotecan and UCN-01 in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Methods

A two-stage phase II trial was designed for patients with advanced ovarian cancer with progressive disease despite prior treatment with platinum and paclitaxel. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer were treated with topotecan, 1 mg/m2 IV, days 1 to 5, and UCN-01 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of the first cycle, and 35 mg/m2 on day 1 of all subsequent cycles. Treatment was repeated on a 3-week cycle. The primary objective of this study was objective response rate while secondary objectives included rates of stable disease, duration of response, progression-free and overall survival, as well as toxicity. Tumor biopsy specimens were also collected where possible for molecular correlative studies.

Results

Twenty-nine patients are evaluable for toxicity and efficacy. Three patients (10%) achieved a partial response. The median time to progression was 3.3 months (95% CI 1.5–NA), and the median overall survival was 9.7 months (95% CI: 7.5–15.3). The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (79%), anemia (41%), thrombocytopenia (14%), hyperglycemia (10%), and pain (10%).

Conclusion

The combination of UCN-01 and topotecan is generally well tolerated, however, this combination is not considered to have significant antitumor activity against advanced ovarian cancer.

Keywords: Ovarian cancer; Topotecan; UCN-01; Cyclin-dependent kinase modulator

Article Outline

Introduction
Materials and methods
Patient eligibility
Treatment plan
Evaluations during treatment
Dose adjustments
Correlative studies of tumor biopsies
Statistical considerations
Results
Patient characteristics
Treatment duration
Toxicities
Efficacy
Correlative studies
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References


Gynecologic Oncology
Volume 106, Issue 2, August 2007, Pages 305-310
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.