ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Gynecologic Oncology
Volume 105, Issue 2, May 2007, Pages 508-516
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (195 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.01.019    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

A phase II trial of thalidomide in patients with refractory endometrial cancer and correlation with angiogenesis biomarkers: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

D. Scott McMeekina, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Michael W. Sillb, Doris Benbrookc, Kathleen M. Darcyd, Deborah J. Stearns-Kurosawae, Lynne Eatonf and S. Diane Yamadag

aDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Health Sciences Center, OB/GYN, P.O. Box 26901, Williams Pavilion-Room WP2470, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, USA bGOG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA cDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, USA dGOG Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA eOklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA fDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA gSection of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

Received 25 October 2006. 
Available online 15 February 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Objectives.

A phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the anti-tumor activity and adverse effects of thalidomide in persistent or recurrent endometrial cancer refractory to cytotoxic chemotherapy and to correlate angiogenesis biomarker expression with clinical outcome.

Methods.

Consenting patients were treated until progression or intolerable toxicity with an oral starting dose of 200 mg thalidomide/day that was to increase by 200 mg every 2 weeks to a target dose of 1000 mg/day. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblastic growth factor (bFGF), and soluble endothelial protein C receptor (sEPCR) were analyzed by ELISA in pre and post-treatment specimens.

Results.

Twenty-four of twenty-seven patients enrolled in the study were eligible, of whom 2 reached the target dose, 8 progressed before achieving the target dose, and 14 refused or had toxicity that prohibited escalation. Two patients (8.3%) remained progression-free ≥ 6 months. There were 3 (12.5%) with partial responses, 2 (8.3%) with stable disease, 15 (62.5%) with increasing disease, and 4 (16.7%) who were inevaluable for response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.7 months and 6.3 months, respectively. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Common grade 3 toxicities included hematologic (n = 3), cardiovascular (n = 3), constitutional (n = 3), and neurologic (n = 4). Thalidomide did not decrease VEGF or bFGF levels but reduced sEPCR levels in serum. Elevated plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels were associated with increased risk of progression and death.

Conclusions.

Thalidomide demonstrated limited ability to delay progression (as measured by PFS at 6 months), produce objective responses, or reduce angiogenic marker levels in chemotherapy refractory endometrial cancer. VEGF level appears to be prognostically significant in such patients, independent of thalidomide treatment.

Keywords: Thalidomide; GOG; Refractory endometrial cancer angiogenesis biomarkers

Article Outline

Introduction
Materials and methods
Study population
Treatment plan and outcome measurements
Specimen collection procedures
Quantification of VEGF, bFGF, and sEPCR
Statistical design and methods
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References


Gynecologic Oncology
Volume 105, Issue 2, May 2007, Pages 508-516
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.