Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Seizure anticipation: Are neurophenomenological approaches able to detect preictal symptoms?
Received 20 December 2005;
Abstract
Analysis of electroencephalographic signals and several brain imaging studies suggest that a preictal state precedes the onset of seizures. In this study, we used phenomenological strategies to detect modifications in patients’ experience before their seizures. We observed that patients with partial epilepsy feeling an aura (n = 9) frequently experienced prodromes (n = 6). Prodromes were subtle preictal symptoms, varying among patients and having common negative features. They were generally continuous before seizures and could last hours, whereas auras were sudden and intermittent. All patients were able to recognize facilitating factors. We also found that patients spontaneously develop cognitive countermeasures to avoid facilitating factors (n = 6), to prevent a seizure (n = 1) or to interrupt a seizure (n = 5). Prodromes are not specific enough for clinical use, but could refine the behavioral strategies used in the treatment of epilepsy and the pathophysiology of the preictal state.
Keywords: Neurophenomenology; Phenomenology; Epilepsy; Seizure anticipation; Seizure prediction; Aura; Prodrome; Control of epileptic seizures; Behavioral treatment of epilepsy
Article Outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Methods
- 2.1. Patient population
- 2.2. Phenomenological analysis
- 2.2.1. Collecting descriptions of the preictal subjective experience
- 2.2.2. Analyzing and comparing the collected descriptions
- 2.3. Classification of the subjective symptoms
- 3. Results
- 4. Discussion
- 4.1. Description difficulties
- 4.2. Hypothesis of the preictal state
- 4.3. Countermeasures
- 4.3.1. Ability to prevent a seizure
- 4.3.2. Ability to stop a seizure
- 4.4. Perspectives
- 5. Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References






E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (6)







