Original ArticleGamma Knife Surgery for Metastatic Brain Tumors from Gynecologic Cancer
Introduction
Brain metastases occur at incidences of 15%–40% with various types of primary cancer.1, 2, 3 The rates of metastases to the brain are about 40% from lung cancer and about 15% from breast cancer, whereas only 1%–2% of clinically diagnosed cases originate from the various gynecologic cancers (ovarian, endometrial, and uterine cervical cancers).1, 2, 3 However, the incidences of metastatic brain tumors from gynecologic cancer have increased, as with other primary cancers, as a result of the prolonged survival of patients with cancer resulting from earlier diagnosis and more effective systemic chemotherapy.
Brain metastases are generally treated with single or multimodality therapies, including surgical resection, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), or stereotactic radiosurgery, depending on the systemic condition of the patient.1, 2, 3, 4 Radiosurgery is known to be effective against metastatic brain tumors from various primary cancers based on the palliation of neurologic symptoms,4, 5, 6 but the efficacy and safety are less discussed in the large population with brain metastases from gynecologic cancer, whose primary lesions might tend to be insensitive to radiation treatment.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
The present study retrospectively investigated the results of Gamma Knife (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) surgery (GKS) in patients with metastatic brain tumors from gynecologic cancer to assess the efficacy and the prognostic factors of local tumor growth control and survival.
Section snippets
Methods
A total of 70 women with metastatic brain tumors from primary gynecologic cancer, aged from 18 to 86 years (mean 59.4 ± 12.7 years), were treated with GKS at Yokohama Rosai Hospital between January 1995 and December 2013. All patients underwent periodic clinical and neuroradiologic follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after the initial radiosurgical procedure. The patients harbored 306 lesions with maximum diameter of less than 3 cm on the axial, coronal, and sagittal gadolinium-enhanced
Results
Retrospective review found that the 70 patients with 306 lesions (mean, 3.8 ± 1.9; range, 1–31 tumors per patient) underwent 107 separate GKS procedures (mean, 1.6 ± 0.8; range, 1–7 procedures per patient), including initial treatment of 153 lesions and additional treatment of 153 lesions. Patient characteristics at initial GKS are listed in Table 1 for the entire population and 2 groups are distinguished based on the primary cancer: 33 patients with ovarian cancer and 37 with uterine cancer
Discussion
Brain metastases from gynecologic cancers generally manifest in the relatively final stage of the progression of the primary cancer, similar to systemic metastases of the lung, liver, or bone, so are considered as a negative prognostic sign, and most patients with brain metastases from gynecologic cancer have poorer systemic condition compared with other primary cancers, such as lung or breast cancer.1, 2, 3 Therefore, radiosurgery is likely to be the optimum procedure for the treatment of
Conclusions
The present study showed that GKS was effective for control of local tumor growth of brain metastases from gynecologic cancer, and GKS can be performed as a salvage treatment to palliate neurologic symptoms and provide moderate quality of life for the remainder of the patient's life. Patients treated by GKS should be carefully followed up, and repeat GKS should be considered for local tumor growth control after early detection of recurrent tumor. Metastatic brain tumor from gynecologic cancer
References (24)
- et al.
Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study
Lancet Oncol
(2014) - et al.
Successful treatment of brain metastases from ovarian cancer using gamma-knife radiosurgery
Gynecol Oncol
(1997) - et al.
Gamma-knife radiosurgery for the treatment of ovarian cancer metastatic to the brain
Gynecol Oncol
(2005) - et al.
Gamma-knife radiosurgery as an optimal treatment modality for brain metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer
Gynecol Oncol
(2008) - et al.
A case of multiple brain metastases of uterine leiomyosarcoma with a literature review
Surg Oncol
(2011) - et al.
Brain metastases in women with epithelial ovarian cancer: multimodal treatment including surgery or gamma-knife radiation is associated with prolonged survival
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
(2013) - et al.
Central nervous system metastasis in gynecologic cancer: symptom management, prognosis and palliative management strategies
Gynecol Oncol
(2015) - et al.
Semiquantitative analysis using thallium-201 SPECT for differential diagnosis between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis after gamma knife surgery for malignant brain tumors
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2013) - et al.
Brain metastases from ovarian carcinoma
ISRN Oncol
(2011) - et al.
Brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma
ISRN Oncol
(2012)
Brain metastases from cervical carcinoma: overview of pertinent literature
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol
Gamma knife radiosurgery for the management of cerebral metastases from non-small cell lung cancer
J Neurosurg
Cited by (19)
Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases arising from gynecological malignancies: A retrospective treatment outcome analysis
2024, Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceCentral nervous system metastasis from epithelial ovarian cancer- predictors of outcome
2023, Current Problems in CancerCitation Excerpt :Survival time following CNS metastasis has varied widely across studies, presumably due to uneven distribution of several clinic-pathological and treatment related factors. Good performance score,19,29-32 presence of solitary brain metastasis9,23,27-29,33-35 and absence of extracranial disease27,28,30-37 have been identified as important predictors of outcome. Surgical resection of brain metastasis has also been associated favorable outcomes.9
Age, pathology and CA-125 are prognostic factors for survival in patients with brain metastases from gynaecological tumours
2020, Clinical and Translational Radiation OncologyCitation Excerpt :It could be the case that differences in variables in the respective prognostic models causes the effect of performance status to differ between studies, as different clinical factors are corrected for. Also, the choice of performance status (KPS or ECOG) can be the cause of this discordance, as Matsunaga et al. and Johnston et al. also examined the effect of KPS, and found no significant effect [20,21]. A final possibility is that, due to the relatively high KPS in our dataset (median 80, with an IQR of 80–100), the effects of lower KPS are harder to determine.
Gamma Knife Surgery for Brain Metastases from Uterine Malignant Tumor
2020, World NeurosurgeryLinear accelerator-based radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastasis secondary to gynecologic malignancies: A single institution series examining outcomes of a rare entity
2018, Gynecologic Oncology ReportsCitation Excerpt :Despite the reduction in brain recurrence and neurologic deaths, surgical intervention followed by WBRT (or WBRT alone) does not result in an increased actuarial survival or length of time patients were able to function independently (Kasper et al., 2017). However, because of the rarity of gynecologic BM, there are relatively few studies that evaluate the influence of stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy on overall survival time, disease-free progression, and local control of gynecologic brain metastasis (Anupol et al., 2002; Aoyama et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2017; Matsunaga et al., 2016; McMeekin et al., 2001; Mehta et al., 2005). This study aims to evaluate the pre-existing literature and conduct an institutional analysis of patients treated with SRS and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) to determine survival, tumor control, and disease-free progression in patients diagnosed with gynecologic brain metastasis.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.