Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 89, May 2016, Pages 455-463
World Neurosurgery

Original Article
Gamma Knife Surgery for Metastatic Brain Tumors from Gynecologic Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.062Get rights and content

Objective

The incidences of metastatic brain tumors from gynecologic cancer have increased. The results of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for the treatment of patients with brain metastases from gynecologic cancer (ovarian, endometrial, and uterine cervical cancers) were retrospectively analyzed to identify the efficacy and prognostic factors for local tumor control and survival.

Methods

The medical records were retrospectively reviewed of 70 patients with 306 tumors who underwent GKS for brain metastases from gynecologic cancer between January 1995 and December 2013 in our institution.

Results

The primary cancers were ovarian in 33 patients with 147 tumors and uterine in 37 patients with 159 tumors. Median tumor volume was 0.3 cm3. Median marginal prescription dose was 20 Gy. The local tumor control rates were 96.4% at 6 months and 89.9% at 1 year. There was no statistically significant difference between ovarian and uterine cancers. Higher prescription dose and smaller tumor volume were significantly correlated with local tumor control. Median overall survival time was 8 months. Primary ovarian cancer, controlled extracranial metastases, and solitary brain metastasis were significantly correlated with satisfactory overall survival. Median activities of daily living (ADL) preservation survival time was 8 months. Primary ovarian cancer, controlled extracranial metastases, and higher Karnofsky Performance Status score were significantly correlated with better ADL preservation.

Conclusions

GKS is effective for control of tumor progression in patients with brain metastases from gynecologic cancer, and may provide neurologic benefits and preservation of the quality of life.

Introduction

Brain metastases occur at incidences of 15%–40% with various types of primary cancer.1, 2, 3 The rates of metastases to the brain are about 40% from lung cancer and about 15% from breast cancer, whereas only 1%–2% of clinically diagnosed cases originate from the various gynecologic cancers (ovarian, endometrial, and uterine cervical cancers).1, 2, 3 However, the incidences of metastatic brain tumors from gynecologic cancer have increased, as with other primary cancers, as a result of the prolonged survival of patients with cancer resulting from earlier diagnosis and more effective systemic chemotherapy.

Brain metastases are generally treated with single or multimodality therapies, including surgical resection, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), or stereotactic radiosurgery, depending on the systemic condition of the patient.1, 2, 3, 4 Radiosurgery is known to be effective against metastatic brain tumors from various primary cancers based on the palliation of neurologic symptoms,4, 5, 6 but the efficacy and safety are less discussed in the large population with brain metastases from gynecologic cancer, whose primary lesions might tend to be insensitive to radiation treatment.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22

The present study retrospectively investigated the results of Gamma Knife (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) surgery (GKS) in patients with metastatic brain tumors from gynecologic cancer to assess the efficacy and the prognostic factors of local tumor growth control and survival.

Section snippets

Methods

A total of 70 women with metastatic brain tumors from primary gynecologic cancer, aged from 18 to 86 years (mean 59.4 ± 12.7 years), were treated with GKS at Yokohama Rosai Hospital between January 1995 and December 2013. All patients underwent periodic clinical and neuroradiologic follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after the initial radiosurgical procedure. The patients harbored 306 lesions with maximum diameter of less than 3 cm on the axial, coronal, and sagittal gadolinium-enhanced

Results

Retrospective review found that the 70 patients with 306 lesions (mean, 3.8 ± 1.9; range, 1–31 tumors per patient) underwent 107 separate GKS procedures (mean, 1.6 ± 0.8; range, 1–7 procedures per patient), including initial treatment of 153 lesions and additional treatment of 153 lesions. Patient characteristics at initial GKS are listed in Table 1 for the entire population and 2 groups are distinguished based on the primary cancer: 33 patients with ovarian cancer and 37 with uterine cancer

Discussion

Brain metastases from gynecologic cancers generally manifest in the relatively final stage of the progression of the primary cancer, similar to systemic metastases of the lung, liver, or bone, so are considered as a negative prognostic sign, and most patients with brain metastases from gynecologic cancer have poorer systemic condition compared with other primary cancers, such as lung or breast cancer.1, 2, 3 Therefore, radiosurgery is likely to be the optimum procedure for the treatment of

Conclusions

The present study showed that GKS was effective for control of local tumor growth of brain metastases from gynecologic cancer, and GKS can be performed as a salvage treatment to palliate neurologic symptoms and provide moderate quality of life for the remainder of the patient's life. Patients treated by GKS should be carefully followed up, and repeat GKS should be considered for local tumor growth control after early detection of recurrent tumor. Metastatic brain tumor from gynecologic cancer

References (24)

  • E. Piura et al.

    Brain metastases from cervical carcinoma: overview of pertinent literature

    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol

    (2012)
  • G. Bowden et al.

    Gamma knife radiosurgery for the management of cerebral metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

    J Neurosurg

    (2015)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Central nervous system metastasis from epithelial ovarian cancer- predictors of outcome

      2023, Current Problems in Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Survival time following CNS metastasis has varied widely across studies, presumably due to uneven distribution of several clinic-pathological and treatment related factors. Good performance score,19,29-32 presence of solitary brain metastasis9,23,27-29,33-35 and absence of extracranial disease27,28,30-37 have been identified as important predictors of outcome. Surgical resection of brain metastasis has also been associated favorable outcomes.9

    • Age, pathology and CA-125 are prognostic factors for survival in patients with brain metastases from gynaecological tumours

      2020, Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It could be the case that differences in variables in the respective prognostic models causes the effect of performance status to differ between studies, as different clinical factors are corrected for. Also, the choice of performance status (KPS or ECOG) can be the cause of this discordance, as Matsunaga et al. and Johnston et al. also examined the effect of KPS, and found no significant effect [20,21]. A final possibility is that, due to the relatively high KPS in our dataset (median 80, with an IQR of 80–100), the effects of lower KPS are harder to determine.

    • Linear accelerator-based radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastasis secondary to gynecologic malignancies: A single institution series examining outcomes of a rare entity

      2018, Gynecologic Oncology Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite the reduction in brain recurrence and neurologic deaths, surgical intervention followed by WBRT (or WBRT alone) does not result in an increased actuarial survival or length of time patients were able to function independently (Kasper et al., 2017). However, because of the rarity of gynecologic BM, there are relatively few studies that evaluate the influence of stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy on overall survival time, disease-free progression, and local control of gynecologic brain metastasis (Anupol et al., 2002; Aoyama et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2017; Matsunaga et al., 2016; McMeekin et al., 2001; Mehta et al., 2005). This study aims to evaluate the pre-existing literature and conduct an institutional analysis of patients treated with SRS and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) to determine survival, tumor control, and disease-free progression in patients diagnosed with gynecologic brain metastasis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

    View full text