Method and surface roughness aspects for the design of DLC coatings
Introduction
One way to increase the service life and tribological performance of machine elements is to apply a thin coating of hard diamond-like carbon (DLC). Such coatings have been shown to have the potential to greatly increase the frictional and wear performance of machine elements [1]. DLC coatings can be made in a large number of variants [1], [2]. One example of a machine element that is suitable for coating is a roller follower in a valve train system, shown in Fig. 1. In the same figure a measured form of topography is also presented. Under load, the pressure distribution profile between the two components will depend on the roughness of their surfaces. Where there is an asperity, there will be higher normal pressure than in a valley. The coating thickness, elastic modulus and surface topography parameters influence the stress in the coating when loaded. Several researchers [3], [4], [5] have calculated the stress and strain in the coating and substrate for both two and three-dimensional cases. Most of the work in the literature is related to stiff coatings on a relatively compliant substrate. However, for DLC coatings, which are of interest in the motor vehicle industry, the substrate is stiffer than the coating [6]. The brittle ceramic-like structure of DLC coatings makes them better at withstanding compressive stresses than tensional stresses [7]. Due to surface roughness effects in contacts between machine elements, there will be pressure spikes at asperities in contact and much lower pressures between asperities in contact. Where one asperity is in contact, the situation can be compared to a ball on a flat contact. In such cases, the largest principal stress for a homogenous material outside the contact circle is given by Eq. (1):where po is the maximum Hertzian pressure, ν the Poisson's ratio, a0 the contact radius and r the radius in a cylindrical coordinate system. The maximum tensional stress is reached at the edge of the contact and the stress then decays with increasing distance. Fig. 2 is a schematic representation of two surfaces in contact, where the size and shape of the contact areas depend strongly on the surface topography of the mating surfaces. In Fig. 2, the distance between the contact spots is one wavelength defined as 2λ. When two asperities are in close proximity, they will influence each other in such a way that as λ decreases and a0 increases, the function for σ1 will have a local maximum between the asperities. This paper investigates the influence of the density and size of asperities in contact on the tensional stress for a coated surface.
Section snippets
The finite element model
The computer program Pro/Mechanicha 2000i2 was used to study the problem described in this paper. This program uses p-type finite elements and is based on the assumption that the material is linear elastic. The three-dimensional finite element model uses a hexagonal unit cell (see Fig. 3, Fig. 4). With the boundary conditions used, the model simulates the situation where two infinite plane surfaces come into contact with spherical asperities a distance 2λ apart, which creates local Hertzian
Results and discussion
Statistical design investigation can be used to obtain an overview of the effects of the different parameters involved in designing a coated surface for different surface roughnesses. Four parameters are dealt with in this paper, which examines their effect on their own and in linear combinations, as well as non-linear effects on the maximum tensional stress in the coating. A factorial design study with three levels and four variables was used. The response was the maximum principal stress in
Conclusion
This paper reports on a calculation of the tensional stress for a coated component as a function of contact asperity size and density in the contact. A ‘small’ asperity is defined as having the same size as the coating thickness, and a ‘large’ asperity is one that is much larger than the coating thickness. Low and high stress levels are assessed in relation to Eq. (1).
The model shows that surface roughness and material properties have a significant effect on the tensional stress level in the
References (10)
- et al.
ME-C:H coatings in motor vehicles
Wear
(2001) - et al.
Design and evaluation of tribological coatings
Wear
(2000) - et al.
Influence of residual stresses on fracture and delamination of thin hard coatings
Wear
(1999) - et al.
Three-dimensional contact analysis of layered elastic/plastic solids with rough surfaces
Wear
(2001) - et al.
Wear and friction characteristics of PVD-coated roller bearings
Surface Coat. Technol.
(2004)
Cited by (13)
Contact size effects on the friction and wear of amorphous carbon films
2022, Applied Surface Science AdvancesCitation Excerpt :Santner and co-authors [57–60] have analysed the effect of topography of friction response and how subsequent surface modification can influence the friction signal. A number of authors have studied how topography affects both the growth dynamics of DLC films and their wear highlighting the importance of deposition characteristics on the surface roughness of deposited films and deleterious effect of high surface roughness on wear [9,61–66]. Nano-scale wear has been explored in the form of nano-fretting and nano-scratch tests demonstrating mechanisms that features a high degree of surface topographic change [67–70].
The influence of carbon based coatings and surface finish on the tribological performance in high-load contacts
2016, Tribology InternationalCitation Excerpt :High surface roughness generates similar contact spots and the high tensional stresses can enhance the crack generation and delamination of the coating. It has also been reported that for the coatings with more compliant nature compared to the substrate, will experience lower tensional stresses [31,32]. The plastic deformation of the substrate material and the tensional stresses generated in coatings has the major effect on the delamination of coatings deposited on the ground surfaces.
Application of diamond-like carbon coatings to elastomers frictional surfaces
2009, Tribology International