Elsevier

Veterinary Parasitology

Volume 117, Issue 4, 28 November 2003, Pages 251-262
Veterinary Parasitology

Gastrointestinal parasites of domestic cats in Perth, Western Australia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.08.010Get rights and content

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in a sample of domestic cats in Perth and the knowledge of their owners about the control and potential for zoonotic transmission of these parasites. Faecal samples (418), collected from cats originating from five sources, were examined by microscopy and questionnaires administered to cat owners. Forty randomly selected samples were also screened using PCR in order to detect cysts of Giardia and oocysts of Cryptosporidium that may have been present in a faecal sample at very low levels. The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in domestic cats by microscopy was 8.6%. Pet shop kittens had the highest parasite prevalence (34.3%), followed by cats and kittens from breeding establishments (15.8%), refuge cats and kittens (8.3%), privately owned cats (2.3%), and boarding cats and kittens (1.6%). Surprisingly, 80% of the 40 cats tested by PCR were positive for Giardia duodenalis and 10% for Cryptosporidium. None of these cats were positive on microscopy. After adjusting for other factors with multiple logistic regression, kittens less than 6 months of age, and cats living in households with more than one cat or with a dog were significantly more likely to be parasitised. In the logistic regression model, the presence of parasitism was also significantly influenced by the number of anthelmintic doses administered in the 12 month period prior to the study. The majority (64.5%) of cat owners were aware that feline parasites could be transmitted to humans, however less than half (42.8%) were aware of the modes of transmission to humans.

Introduction

Recently, concerns about the public health dangers of pet ownership have increased considerably, and while many potentially zoonotic organisms are associated with cats, enteric pathogens are of particular concern (Hill et al., 2000). In relation to immunocompromised humans, although the origin of zoonotic infections is usually unknown, parasites such as Cryptosporidium which can also parasitise cats (Mtambo et al., 1991, Sargent et al., 1998, Spain et al., 2001) have the ability to cause life-threatening infections in these individuals (Garrido-Davila and Ramirez-Ronda, 1991, Crowe, 1992).

There have been few detailed and comprehensive studies of the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in domestic cats carried out and there is little information on the level of parasitic infestation in domestic cats with parasites such as Toxocara cati and Cryptosporidium. Most surveys of feline gastrointestinal parasites conducted in the past have been limited to feral cats (Coman et al., 1981a, Coman et al., 1981b; Nichol et al., 1981, Milstein and Goldsmid, 1997), and have been carried out in order to identify the significance of feral cats as potential reservoirs of infection (Calvete et al., 1997). While previous studies on the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in feral cats have yielded important results (Milstein and Goldsmid, 1997), it cannot be assumed these results are indicative of the situation in domestic cats. However, as the potential for zoonotic transmission of gastrointestinal parasites (Glickman and Magnaval, 1993, Schantz, 1994, Overgaauw, 1997) and the human health risks associated with cat ownership (Garrido-Davila and Ramirez-Ronda, 1991, Angulo et al., 1994, Schantz, 1994) are now being realised, it is important that these studies are also conducted on domestic cats in urban areas in order to determine the potential reservoir of infection for humans.

The current study was therefore designed to determine the prevalence of enteric parasites in different groups of cats from the Perth metropolitan area. A questionnaire survey was also employed to obtain demographic and management data relating to the cats sampled, as well as determining cat owners knowledge of zoonotic parasites. This information was then correlated with the parasitological results obtained.

Section snippets

Source of faecal samples

Feline faecal samples (n=418) were collected from five sources in metropolitan Perth during January to September 2001. Fresh faecal samples were collected from cats (n=125) boarding at a local boarding facility. The ages of the cats ranged from 6 months to 20 years. This facility was attached to a veterinary clinic. At three refuge facilities, samples were collected from adult cats and young kittens (n=120). The ages of the kittens and cats ranged from 6 weeks to 12 years old, however the

Collection and purification of cysts and oocysts and isolation of DNA

Cysts and oocysts were collected and purified and DNA was isolated as described previously (McGlade et al., 2003).

Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites

The overall prevalence of infestation with gastrointestinal parasites by microscopy was 8.6% (CI 3.1–14.1). Infection with only one species of parasite was more common (7.6%) than infection with multiple parasite species (1%). Approximately one-third (34.3%, CI 18.6–50.0) of the kittens from pet shops were infected with at least one parasite, compared with 15.8% (CI 8.5–23.1) of cats from breeding establishments, 8.3% (CI 3.4–13.3) of refuge cats, 2.3% (CI 0–6.8) of privately owned cats and

Discussion

This study has found that the level of gastrointestinal helminth and protozoan parasites, with the exception of Giardia and Cryptosporidium, in domestic cats in metropolitan Perth is very low. The findings confirm a trend in Australia of a reduction in the prevalence of helminth parasites in cats, particularly T. cati (Shaw et al., 1983, Sargent, 1997). It is evident that enteric protozoan parasites are now the dominant parasites affecting domestic cats in Perth, with a prevalence considerably

Acknowledgements

The cooperation of all the cat owners who were involved in this project is gratefully acknowledged.

References (33)

  • B.J Coman et al.

    Helminth parasites and arthropods of feral cats

    Aust. Vet. J.

    (1981)
  • S Crowe

    Management of AIDS related infections

    Today’s Life Sci.

    (1992)
  • A Elliot et al.

    Improved staining method for detecting Cryptosporidium oocysts in stools using malachite green

    J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.

    (1999)
  • E.C Faust et al.

    A critical study of clinical laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of protozoan cysts and helminth eggs in feces

    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.

    (1938)
  • Frankena, K., Graat, E.A.M., 1997. Multivariate analysis: logistic regression. In: Noordhuizen, J.P.T.M., Frankena, K.,...
  • J.I Garrido-Dávila et al.

    Updates on AIDS Cryptosporidiosis: a review

    Bol. Assoc. Med. P. R.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (85)

    • Cryptosporidiosis and Cyclosporiasis

      2022, Greene's Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat, Fifth Edition
    • Contamination of Italian parks with canine helminth eggs and health risk perception of the public

      2019, Preventive Veterinary Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is surprising in comparison to previous studies carried out in Italy, where most dog owners were aware of faecal-transmitted zoonoses, including routes of transmission (Beraldo et al., 2014; Zanzani et al., 2014). Similar data were described in Australia: dog and cat owners were aware of the potential risk of parasitic zoonoses originating from pets, even if the routes of transmission were not clear (McGlade et al., 2003; Palmer et al., 2010). Nonetheless, a USA study provided similar results to those presented here: most of the people interviewed were unaware of dog-originating zoonoses (Bingham et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text