Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 35, Issue 33, 24 July 2017, Pages 4072-4078
Vaccine

Prenatal Tdap immunization and risk of maternal and newborn adverse events

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.071Get rights and content

Abstract

Many countries recommend combined tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis immunization (Tdap) during pregnancy to stimulate transplacental transmission of pertussis antibodies to newborns. The immune system can be altered during pregnancy, potentially resulting in differing immunization risks in pregnant women. The safety of widespread Tdap immunization during pregnancy needs to be established. Our objective was to assess whether prenatal Tdap immunization was associated with adverse birth outcomes, and to evaluate the effect of timing of Tdap administration on these outcomes.

We identified pregnancies at delivery in a large insurance claims database (2010–2014). Tdap immunization was categorized as optimal prenatal (27 + weeks), early prenatal (<27 weeks), postpartum (≤7 days post-delivery), or none. Medical claims were searched to identify maternal adverse immunization reactions (e.g. anaphylaxis, fever, Guillian-Barre syndrome [GBS]), adverse birth outcomes (e.g. preeclampsia/eclampsia, premature rupture or membranes, chorioamnionitis) and newborn outcomes (e.g. respiratory distress, pulmonary hypertension, neonatal jaundice). Women with optimal or early prenatal Tdap were compared to those not immunized in pregnancy, using propensity score-weighted log-binomial regression and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR). We identified 1,079,034 deliveries and 677,075 linked newborns; 11.5% were immunized optimally and 2.3% immunized early. There were 1 case of post-immunization anaphylaxis, and 12 cases of maternal encephalopathy (all post- delivery); there were no cases of GBS. Optimally-timed immunization was associated with small increased relative risks of: chorioamnionitis [RR = 1.11, (95% CI: 1.07–1.15), overall risk = 2.8%], and postpartum hemorrhage [RR = 1.23 (95% DI: 1.18–1.28), overall risk = 2.4%]; however, these relative increases corresponded to low absolute risk increases. Tdap was not associated with increased risk of any adverse newborn outcome. Overall, prenatal Tdap immunization was not associated with newborn adverse events, but potential associations with chorioamnionitis consistent with one previous study and postpartum hemorrhage require further investigation.

Introduction

Tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis immunization (Tdap) administered during pregnancy conveys passive pertussis immunity to newborns via transplacental transmission of maternal pertussis antibodies [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]; thus, several countries recommend Tdap during every pregnancy, including closely spaced pregnancies [7], [8], [9]. Despite international efforts to prevent infant pertussis through maternal Tdap, prenatal uptake remains sub-optimal [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], due in part to concerns about safety [15], [16]. While generally accepted as safe, widespread prenatal Tdap requires careful scrutiny to establish the safety for the mother and newborn.

Tdap has not been associated with clinically significant harms for the fetus or neonate such as preterm birth, small for gestational age, stillbirth, low birth weight, or congenital anomalies [17]. Similarly, there is no evidence of increased risk of serious adverse events in pregnancy, with the exception of unreplicated findings of increased chorioamnionitis risk from one retrospective study [17], [18]. Previous non-experimental studies have been limited by small sample size, unclear immunization timing, and confounding due to comparing guideline-adherent immunized versus non-adherent unimmunized populations. Given that a strong understanding of the safety of Tdap during pregnancy may be central to increasing uptake, additional studies are needed.

Furthermore, considerable uncertainty persists about the optimal timing of prenatal Tdap administration. The CDC recommends administration at any time during pregnancy, though preferably between gestational weeks 27–36 [19] to maximize maternal antibody response and passive antibody transfer; other countries recommend administration during the second [8] or third trimesters [9] to improve immunization coverage for preterm deliveries. Safety studies which account for the timing of immunization are limited [17].

To examine the safety of Tdap administration during pregnancy, we conducted a large-scale, cohort study comparing the risks of adverse outcomes in the infant and mother associated with Tdap and examined the impact of timing of Tdap administration on safety.

Section snippets

Methods

This administrative insurance claims-based cohort study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC).

Results

We identified 1,079,034 women (mean age = 29.2 years, SD 5.4 years) with deliveries meeting our study criteria (eFig. 1). Of these women, 148,817 (13.8%) received Tdap during pregnancy, and an additional 59,040 (5.5%) women received Tdap postpartum. The percentage of pregnant women receiving Tdap increased over time; cohort characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Discussion

In this cohort of 1,079,034 pregnant women in the U.S., serious maternal and infant adverse reactions following immunization were rare; for example, only 1 of 207,857 immunized women experienced anaphylaxis, and we detected no cases of GBS within 42 days after Tdap receipt. Twelve prenatally-vaccinated women were later diagnosed with encephalopathy, although all cases occurred during the delivery hospitalization or following delivery, obscuring whether the encephalopathy was associated with the

Conflict of interest

Dr. Layton receives unrestricted salary support from the Center for Pharmacoepidemiology in the UNC Department of Epidemiology; current member companies include GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and UCB. Dr. Weber served on Speakers' Bureaus and as a vaccine consultant (Merck, Pfizer). Dr. Becker-Dreps has received investigator-initiated research funds from Pfizer for an unrelated study on pneumococcal vaccines.

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by a grant from the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (5R21AI115205). The database infrastructure used for this project was funded by the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health; the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC; the CER Strategic Initiative of UNC’s Clinical & Translational Science Award (UL1TR001111); and the UNC School of Medicine. S.B.-D. is supported by Grant 2015213 from the Doris Duke

References (38)

  • E. Leuridan et al.

    Effect of a prepregnancy pertussis booster dose on maternal antibody titers in young infants

    The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

    (2011)
  • K. Winter et al.

    Effectiveness of Prenatal Versus Postpartum Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination in Preventing Infant Pertussis

    Clin Inf Dis: Official Pub Inf Dis Soc Am

    (2017)
  • K.E. Atkins et al.

    Cost-Effectiveness of Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy in the United States

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2016)
  • G. Dabrera et al.

    A case-control study to estimate the effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in protecting newborn infants in England and Wales, 2012–2013

    Clin Inf Dis: Official Pub Inf Dis Soc Am

    (2015)
  • Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in...
  • RCOG statement: Pertussis (whooping cough) vaccination now offered from 20 weeks of pregnancy. London: Royal College of...
  • 4.12 Pertussis. The Australian Immunisation Handbook 10th Edition: Australian Government Department of Health;...
  • R. Koepke et al.

    Pertussis and Influenza Vaccination Among Insured Pregnant Women - Wisconsin, 2013–2014

    MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

    (2015)
  • M. Housey et al.

    Vaccination with tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine of pregnant women enrolled in Medicaid-Michigan, 2011–2013

    MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

    (2014)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Should French pregnant women be vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy?

      2022, Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite et Senologie
    • Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of pertussis vaccine in pregnancy on the risk of chorioamnionitis, non-pertussis infectious diseases and other adverse pregnancy outcomes

      2022, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additional cases of chorioamnionitis may lead to a higher frequency of preterm birth, considering that preterm birth is a clinically important consequence of chorioamnionitis [14]. Two of our included observational studies [12,13] and one RCT [33], all of which used no pertussis containing vaccine as a comparator, found no significantly increased risk of neonatal sepsis. The relation between maternal pertussis vaccination and preterm birth was not examined in this study, but of the included studies two RCTs [32,33] with placebo as comparator and two RCTs [27,38] with Td as comparator found no statistically significant association between maternal pertussis vaccination and preterm birth.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text