doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.03.028
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
Formulation of botulinum neurotoxin heavy chain fragments for vaccine development: mechanisms of adsorption to an aluminum-containing adjuvant
Roberto A. DePaza, c, Ian Hendersonb and Siddharth J. Advanta,
, 
aDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Stability, Diosynth Biotechnology, 101 J. Morris Commons Lane, Morrisville, NC 27560, USA
bDynPort Vaccine Company, LLC, 64 Thomas Johnson Drive, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
cAlphaVax Inc., 2 Triangle Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
Received 15 June 2004;
revised 22 February 2005;
accepted 3 March 2005.
Available online 25 April 2005.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
Heavy chain fragments of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A and B are being developed as a bivalent vaccine for botulism. To potentiate the immune response, an aluminum containing adjuvant will be formulated with the two antigens. The adsorption mechanisms of each antigen to aluminum phosphate and aluminum hydroxide adjuvants were studied. The adsorption of the serotype A antigen to each adjuvant, and the serotype B antigen to aluminum phosphate adjuvant, is dependent on electrostatic attractive forces. The serotype A antigen is basic, and pretreatment with phosphate anions is required for favorable adsorption conditions to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. In contrast, the serotype B antigen displays a high affinity to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant even when the two species possess the same charge. It is proposed that the serotype B antigen is adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide adjuvant by a ligand exchange mechanism.
Keywords: Botulinum neurotoxin; Botulism; Aluminum adjuvants
Fig. 1. Surface charges of rBoNTA(Hc) and rBoNTB(Hc) compared to those of aluminum phosphate (A) and aluminum hydroxide (B) adjuvants. Light areas: positive surface charge; dark areas: negative surface charge; hatched areas: areas of favorable adsorption due to attractive electrostatic forces. The PZC of aluminum hydroxide was taken to be 9.75.
Fig. 2. Extents of rBoNTA(Hc) (dark fill) and rBoNTB(Hc) (gray fill) adsorption as a function of pH in 30 mM phosphate and either 0.2% Rehydraphos® (A) or 0.2% Alhydrogel® (B). The total concentration of each antigen was 20 μg/ml, and the percent adsorbed was determined by HIC as described in the text.
Fig. 3. Extents of rBoNTA(Hc) (A) and rBoNTB(Hc) (B) adsorption versus phosphate concentration in 25 mM acetate, 0.2% Alhydrogel®, pH 5.5. Formulations were monovalent (dotted line) or bivalent (solid line) with 0 mM (●), 100 mM (■), or 150 mM NaCl (
).
Fig. 4. Extents of rBoNTA(Hc) (solid line) and rBoNTB(Hc) (dotted line) adsorption as a function of NaCl (A) and ethylene glycol (B) concentrations. Formulation conditions were 30 mM phosphate, 0.2% Alhydrogel®, pH 7. Ethylene glycol samples also contain 100 mM NaCl.
Fig. 5. 3-D structures of rBoNTA(Hc) and rBoNTB(Hc) generated by RasMol (version 2.7.1.1). Asp and Glu residues are colored orange and black, respectively. The N-termini are noted for reference. The bottom drawings result when the top two are rotated 180° about the vertical axis.
Fig. 6. Reducing SDS-PAGE gel of Alhydrogel®-formulated rBoNTB(Hc) samples after dilution from 100 to 20 μg/ml by different phosphate concentrations. Numbers above the bands refer to the diluting phosphate concentration. ‘C’ refers to a 0.5 μg load of rBoNTB(Hc) formulated without adjuvant to serve as a control, and ‘S’ is a 15 μl load of SeeBlue® Plus2 molecular weight marker, whose values in kDa are shown.
Table 1.
Elution gradient for HIC analysis of rBoNTA(Hc) and rBoNTB(Hc)a
a The values comprise a linear gradient. Each time point is the end of a linear gradient from the previous point and the start of a linear gradient to the next point. The total flow rate was 0.5 ml/min. The time period between 35 and 40 min was programmed as a post-time to re-equilibrate the column.
b Buffer B was 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8. Buffer A was 1.5 M ammonium sulfate, 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8.