Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Road safety education for older drivers: Evaluation of a classroom-based training initiative
Introduction
Around the developed world, driving is an important part of everyday life for many people. Driving provides independence, mobility, and freedom to travel whenever and wherever the driver chooses. Once a driving test is passed, many drivers wish to continue driving for as long as possible. However, as drivers grow older, they may experience a decline in cognitive, perceptual and physiological functions which can affect their ability to drive (Anstey, Wood, Lord, & Walker, 2005). These impairments may cause driving errors such as failing to yield right of way at road junctions or when merging into moving traffic (AGILE (Aged people integration & safety, 2003). With advancing age there is also an increasing risk of visual and medical conditions which may impair fitness to drive (Tuokko et al., 2007, Whelan et al., 2006).
In many countries, older drivers are required to have a visual or medical assessment to ensure they meet current standards for fitness to drive. For example, in Netherlands, Denmark, Cyprus and Ireland drivers aged 70 are required to have a sight test. In the UK, when drivers reach the age of 70 they must make a self-declaration of their medical and visual fitness in order to renew their driving licence, but there is no formal assessment (Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), 2015).
In common with many countries, the UK has an ageing population. There are currently 8 million people aged ≥70, with 5.3 million aged ≥75, representing 8% of the UK population (Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2016). Nearly three-quarters (74%) of UK adults hold a valid driving licence, and there are approximately 38.6 million licence holders (Department for Transport, 2016a). The proportion of drivers aged ≥70 holding a driving licence has increased from 15% in 1975 to 64% in 2015 (Department for Transport, 2016b). The ONS estimates that the number of people aged ≥75 will rise to over 9 million by 2035 and will represent 12.5% of the UK population. Consequently, the number of older drivers on the road will continue to rise. Although older drivers are generally safe, the reduction in health and functional ability that comes with advancing age puts them at increased risk of crash involvement (Langford & Koppel, 2006). The accident involvement rate for older drivers begins to increase after the age of 75 (Mitchell, 2013). Similar findings have been reported in the United States (Guohua, Braver, & Hui Chen, 2003). The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2009) found that drivers 80 and older were overrepresented in crashes, particularly when negotiating complex situations such as intersections or turning across oncoming traffic. However, access to a car and the ability to drive is important to continuing mobility and quality of life for older drivers (Ragland et al., 2005, Whelan et al., 2006). It is therefore important to ensure that older drivers remain safe on the road.
In recognition of the importance of driving into later life, road safety for older drivers has been the focus of considerable research during the twenty-first century. In Canada, and latterly Australia and New Zealand, the Candrive, Candrive II and OzCandrive longitudinal projects have prospectively recruited over a thousand drivers aged 70 and over with the aim of keeping older drivers safely on the road by studying driving behaviour, assessments, medical fitness to drive and screening tools (Langford et al., 2013, Marshall, Man-Son-Hing, Bédard, et al., 2013, Marshall, Man-Son-Hing, Charlton, et al., 2013). These projects and others have provided insights into the behaviour of older drivers and how it may be modified to improve road safety.
An important concept is that of self-awareness of driving abilities. Older drivers often regulate their driving and take fewer risks than younger drivers (Lang, Parkes, & Fernandez Medina, 2013). Gwyther and Holland (2012) found that self-regulation increased with age, and that women were significantly more likely than men to regulate their driving. Driving self-regulation is the driver’s behavioural adaptation to maintain safe driving despite the decline in functioning with advancing age (Donorfio, D'Ambrosio, Coughlin, & Mohyde, 2008). Some older drivers use compensatory strategies such as avoiding difficult situations (e.g. driving at night, in bad weather, or during rush hours), or by increasing safety distances or reducing speed (Baldock et al., 2006, Ball et al., 1998, Donorfio et al., 2009, Gabaude et al., 2010, Holland and Rabbitt, 1992, Molnar and Eby, 2008). However, driving adaptation to a specific situation depends on the self-awareness of abilities and limitations (Anstey et al., 2005).
The provision of specialised training can give drivers insights into their abilities and limitations, and there is evidence that training and refresher courses help older people to continue driving safely for longer. Jones et al. (2012) examined in-class training for drivers aged 60 and over, comparing an intensive taught course to a lower-resource self-guided course, following-up attendees six months later by questionnaire. They found the intensive programme to be most effective, concluding that driving safety programmes which focus on behaviours to self-evaluate driving abilities help older drivers to remain safe on the road. Owsley et al., 2003, Owsley et al., 2004 examined the effectiveness of an educational programme for visually impaired drivers aged 60 and over. They concluded that although it did not alter crash risk, the training improved self-regulation and avoidance of challenging driving situations. In a review of eighteen older driver refresher programmes in Canada, Korner-Bitensky, Menon, Von Zweck, and Van Benthem (2010) found that both classroom-based and on-road training courses improve driver performance, but concluded that there is a need for better evaluation of their effectiveness.
Nasvadi and Vavrik (2007) reported a self-selection bias among drivers attending a mature driver education programme for drivers aged 55 and over in Canada. However, they found that male volunteers aged 75 and over had an increased post-course crash risk compared to women and men aged 55–74. They concluded that understanding the behaviour and characteristics of those who attend mature driver training is essential for the design and delivery of effective courses on road safety.
In view of the above evidence, we designed a training course for older drivers which would educate them in self-evaluation, self-regulation and how to cope with or avoid difficult driving situations. The course would also update their knowledge of driving rules as this has been linked to driving performance (Wolming & Wiberg, 2004). A novel aspect of our course is that it was tailored to drivers aged 75 and over, as this is the group most at risk of crash involvement (Mitchell, 2013), and drivers aged ≥75 have been found to be more likely to fail an on-road test (Classen et al., 2013). Studies of mature driver courses included in recent literature reviews were aimed at drivers aged 60 or 70 plus, with none specific to drivers aged 75 plus (Korner-Bitensky et al., 2009, Kua et al., 2007).
The Dorset Road Safe Partnership created a driver training course specifically aimed at older drivers, called Dorset Driver Gold (DDG). It was initially offered free to older residents pending evaluation of the course. The objectives of the DDG course were to update older drivers regarding their knowledge and awareness of road safety issues and improve driving skills and confidence. The aims of the evaluation were to measure the acceptability of the course to older drivers and demonstrate the effectiveness and utility of the DDG initiative. We also sought to study the behaviour and characteristics of those who attended the course.
The objectives of the study were to:
- 1.
identify driving knowledge (road safety and rules of the road), reasons for driving, and self-regulatory strategies among a group of older drivers with a view to planning future on-road training.
- 2.
measure self-assessments of driving ability and confidence as a driver before and after classroom training delivered by driving instructors.
- 3.
evaluate the utility and acceptability of classroom training courses for older drivers using questionnaires and focus groups.
- 4.
examine the characteristics of course participants, including comparison of differences between male and female and youngest-old and oldest-old drivers.
Section snippets
Study location
The County of Dorset in Southern England has over 54,000 residents aged 75 years and over (ONS, 2016). The county is popular with older people wishing to move to the South Coast after retirement from work. Many of these retirees are drivers who wish to remain mobile and travel independently in their own cars. Much of the county is rural with limited public transport. Consequently, there are significant numbers of older drivers on the roads.
Participants
Recruitment to the DDG courses was by advertisements
Study participants
One hundred and fifty-three older drivers attended one of the classroom training courses. On average there were 22 participants at each course location (range 19–27). Most people heard about the DDG course from a newspaper or magazine advertisement (86, 56%). Most booked by telephone (72, 47%), 28% (43) through the website and 25% (38) via email.
Of the attendees, 142 (93%) completed a pre-course questionnaire and provided demographic information, subsequent analyses are based on this group. The
Discussion
The first objective of this study was to identify current driving knowledge, reasons for driving, and self-regulatory strategies among older drivers to aid planning of future on-road training. Most drivers had over 50 years of driving experience and half had checked current driving regulations in the past two years, some did so because they were coming on the course. Main reasons for driving were for shopping and leisure. Half the drivers did not restrict their driving, but women and the
Conclusion
Driving is very important to many older drivers and this is evidenced by the number of older drivers who volunteered for the course. A major motivation for attending was to have confirmation of their driving competence. This study demonstrates the importance of retraining approaches and of understanding who takes mature driver courses and why. Results provide preliminary evidence that a classroom based course can initiate a behaviour change, which is important when developing innovative
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the Dorset Road Safe Partnership, which created the Dorset Gold older driver training course, and provided funding for both the course and the evaluation study. This Partnership comprises representatives from Dorset County Council, Bournemouth Borough Council, Borough of Poole Council, Dorset Police, Dorset Fire and Rescue Service, and the charities Streetwise and Safewise). We thank Emma Selway of DDC for facilitating the courses and the study; the driving instructors
References (49)
- et al.
Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults
Clinical Psychology Review
(2005) - et al.
Self-regulation of driving and its relationship to driving ability among older adults
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(2006) - et al.
Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(1998) - et al.
Age-related differences in visual scanning at median-divided highway intersections in rural areas
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(2009) - et al.
Gender differences among older drivers in a comprehensive driving evaluation
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(2013) - et al.
Health, safety, self-regulation and the older driver: It’s not just a matter of age
Journal of Safety Research
(2008) - et al.
To drive or not to drive, that isn't the question-the meaning of self-regulation among older drivers
Journal of Safety Research
(2009) - et al.
Self-rated driving performance among elderly drivers referred for driving evaluation
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(2005) - et al.
The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(2012) - et al.
Older drivers’ risks of at-fault motor vehicle collisions
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(2015)
The effect of a low and high resource intervention on older drivers' knowledge, behaviors and risky driving
Accident Analysis and Prevention
Older driver retraining: An updated systematic review of evidence of effectiveness
Journal of Safety Research
Older driver retraining: A systematic review of evidence of effectiveness
Journal of Safety Research
Findings from the candrive/ozcandrive study: Low mileage older drivers, crash risk and reduced fitness to drive
Accident Analysis and Prevention
Epidemiology of older driver crashes – Identifying older driver risk factors and exposure patterns
Transportation Research Part F
Confidence in, and self-rating of, driving ability among older drivers
Accident Analysis and Prevention
Protocol for candrive II/ozcandrive, a multicentre prospective older driver cohort study
Accident Analysis and Prevention
The candrive/ozcandrive prospective older driver study: Methodology and early study findings
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Self-regulation of driving by older adults: Comparison of self-report and objective driving data
Transportation Research Part F
Changes in self-reported driving behaviour following attendance at a mature driver education program
Transportation Research Part F
Crash risk of older drivers after attending a mature driver education programme
Accident Analysis and Prevention
Impact of an educational program on the safety of high-risk, visually impaired, older drivers
Journal of Preventive Medicine
The efficacy of an educational intervention in promoting self-regulation among high-risk older drivers
Accident Analysis and Prevention
The Swedish driver licensure examination: An examination of a two stage model
Journal of Safety Research
Cited by (16)
Thirty years of research on driving behavior active intervention: A bibliometric overview
2023, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)Areas of intervention for enhancing the knowledge of safe driving: An experience in West Bengal, India
2023, Case Studies on Transport PolicyDoes age matter? Examining age-dependent differences in at-fault collisions after attending a refresher course for older drivers
2022, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and BehaviourCitation Excerpt :Thus, it is unlikely that changes in driver confidence and driving avoidance was the main reason for the age-dependent effect of the course upon at-fault collisions. In contrast to Hawley et al. (2018) no gender-specific effects of the course in driver confidence or driving avoidance was found. The main strength of the present study is the use of a large dataset of MVC, resulting in high statistical power to detect possible age-dependent effects of the refresher course on collision involvement.
Effect of educational intervention addressing inaccurate self-assessment of driving performance in older Japanese adults
2021, Accident Analysis and PreventionCitation Excerpt :Interventions for older drivers that have been developed and implemented worldwide are divided into classroom-based educational intervention and practical training including cognitive functional training, simulated driving training and on-road driving training. Generally, classroom education alone has not been found to improve driving performance and reduce crash involvement (Bédard et al., 2004; Nasvadi and Vavrik, 2007; Owsley et al., 2004), although some studies have reported improved knowledge of road safety and driving behaviors based on self-report (Hawley et al., 2018; Owsley et al., 2003). Cognitive functional training can improve cognitive function, but transfer of cognitive training to actual driving behavior is limited (Cuenen et al., 2016; Eramudugolla et al., 2017; Roenker et al., 2003).
Self-perception of driving abilities in older age: A systematic review
2020, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and BehaviourCitation Excerpt :Gender differences were also found in how older drivers thought of their driving skills. In particular, 4 out of 5 studies that used gender as a moderator observed that men had higher self-ratings than women (Hawley et al., 2018; McPeek et al., 2011; Selander et al., 2011; Windsor et al., 2008). One possible interpretation of this finding, provided by previous studies, is that women drive less than men (e.g., Rimmö & Hakamies-Blomqvist, 2002), which may be correlated with women being more stressed and less confident in driving, in general (Ferreira, Marmeleira, Godinho, & Simões, 2017; Rimmö & Hakamies-Blomqvist, 2002).
A video-based approach to promote safe driving among foreign visitors to Japan
2019, IATSS ResearchCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, Cuenena et al. [8] evaluated a road safety education program targeting high school students that used the testimonies of victims (or their relatives/acquaintances) of traffic accidents. In addition, Hawley et al. [9] performed an evaluation of the impact of a road safety education program targeting the elderly delivered in a classroom, while Ben-Bassat and Avnieli [10] evaluated road safety education for kindergarten children using changes in parents' awareness as an index. Furthermore, Wang et al. [11] evaluated BBS education for commercial drivers and showed that the most effective method was a coaching method using statistical data and real graphics.