Elsevier

Tourism Management

Volume 80, October 2020, 104128
Tourism Management

Investigating the effects of offline and online social capital on tourism SME performance: A mixed-methods study of New Zealand entrepreneurs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104128Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Tourism entrepreneurs networking activity manifests in three configurations.

  • Associative and institutional networks were key offline social capital sources.

  • Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter were key online social capital sources.

  • Online networkers have high future growth outlooks in employment and sales revenue.

  • Entrepreneurs with low social capital have poor growth outlooks.

Abstract

Entrepreneurial social capital develops through the accrual of resources gained from an entrepreneur's social ties. These are integral to entrepreneurial success, enabling access to financial, marketing, and human resources, and innovation. Entrepreneurs increasingly manage their networks through online platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter. However, there are major gaps in the extant empirical research concerning how online social capital is manifested, if this differs from an in-person context, and the effects ‘online’ and ‘offline’ social capital resources on tourism business success. This study adopts a mixed-method approach to examine tourism entrepreneur's behaviours in building offline and online social capital, and their nuanced effects on firm performance. The results found tourism entrepreneurs' networking activity manifests in three distinct configurations, Active Online Networkers, In-Person Networkers, and the Less Engaged. Each configuration demonstrated varying effects on expected business growth and performance with regards to number of employees, sales revenues, and net profit.

Introduction

The tourism industry is the highest contributor to foreign exchange earnings in New Zealand (Tourism Industry Aotearoa, 2019), predominantly comprising of SMEs (85% with less than 10 employees (Tourism Industry Aotearoa, 2017)). Thus, the performance of tourism firms is crucial to the success of the tourism industry and the visitor economy. Evidence suggests that an entrepreneur's professional and social networks facilitate access to resources integral to business success such as market information, innovation, and finances. These social and professional connections build entrepreneurial ‘social capital’, defined as ‘the sum of actual and potential resources embedded within, available through, and derived from the network of relationships’ (Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998, p. 243). In addition to physical/real world connections with family, friends, colleagues, and suppliers, entrepreneurs build social capital by using online social networking platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter (Fischer and Reuber, 2011, Sigfusson and Chetty, 2013). However, social ties created and managed through online and offline environments present nuanced relationships and diverse opportunities which, in turn, can have varying types of impacts on a tourism business' activities.

In offline (i.e. face-to-face) environments, the evidence shows an entrepreneurs' social capital positively influencing enterprise performance (Stam, Arzlanian, & Elfring, 2014). Social capital is important to enterprise success as it enables opportunity recognition (Anderson & Miller, 2003), inter-firm alliances (BarNir & Smith, 2002), access to lines of credit (Honig, 1998), access to potential employees (Bosma, Van Praag, Thurik, & De Wit, 2004), development of business acumen (Zhou, Wu, & Luo, 2007), and the sourcing of ideas for innovation (Hughes, Ireland, & Morgan, 2007). However, our review of the literature also highlighted significant gaps on how social capital can develop from an entrepreneurs' online social networks. Although studies looking at online social networking in a tourism context have emerged (c.f. Lo, Mckercher, Lo, Cheung, & Law, 2011; Kim, Lee, & Bonn, 2016; Wang, Kirillova, & Lehto, 2017), most studies to date predominantly use a demand-side approach, focusing on the consumer's perspective and their engagement with social networking sites. In contrast, this study takes a supply-side approach to examine how tourism entrepreneurs utilise online social networking to build social capital and the consequent outcomes on firm performance.

A recent systematic review of research on social media and entrepreneurship demonstrates the adoption, usage, and outcomes of social media use by entrepreneurs (Olanrewaju, Hossain, Whiteside, & Mercieca, 2020). Several studies have examined how engagement with social media platforms can be used for business networking. Kasavana, Nusair, and Teodosic (2010) presented a conceptual paper on the historical development of online social networks and their implications for hotel businesses. However, the applicability of their concepts, which focus on large hotel properties, may not be suitable in the context of tourism SMEs that lack the time, resources, and skills necessary to develop, for example, proprietary online social network sites that can track customers (Kasavana et al., 2010). Smith, Smith, and Shaw (2017) presented a conceptual paper on how entrepreneurs may use online social networks to build their social capital resources, developing 12 propositions to explain how online social networks increases bridging and bonding social capital. However, these propositions are yet to be tested using empirical data. Studies have also looked at entrepreneur's use of Twitter and LinkedIn to build social capital. Fischer and Reuber (2011) examine the role of business-to-business (B2B) interactions on Twitter in enhancing an entrepreneur's goal-setting abilities (Fischer & Reuber, 2011). However, it is unanswered whether these interactions have implications on business success, nor does the study explore equally important connections that can be made between entrepreneurs and other stakeholders such as customers, suppliers, or their local community. Other studies focus on the retweets, posts, or interactions of Twitter and LinkedIn members in online groups for professionals (Sigfusson & Chetty, 2013; Quinton & Wilson, 2016; Wang, Mack, & Maciewjewski, 2016). However, the data extracted for these studies were from groups or discussion boards where membership was not exclusive to entrepreneurs. Therefore, it is unclear whether the interactions were between business owners (i.e. actual entrepreneurs) or individuals with merely an interest in entrepreneurship. In addition, the previous studies reviewed here bind their research settings to a single online networking platform (Twitter or LinkedIn), excluding larger and potentially more relevant online networking platforms to tourism such as Facebook and Instagram (Euromonitor International, 2019).

In light of these research gaps, this study will contribute to the literature on entrepreneurial social capital and empirically examine how entrepreneurs in the tourism sector develop social capital resources through offline (face-to-face) connections, and through online engagement via multiple social networking platforms (in our case Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Instagram). In addition, drawing on theories of entrepreneurship and social capital theory, the study examines the extent to which different forms of social capital (online and offline) have varying effects on tourism firm's performance outlooks. We conduct a mixed methods study through a survey of 285 tourism SMEs in New Zealand, as well as follow up in-depth interviews with tourism entrepreneurs. We use quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis that includes cluster analyses to segment different groups of tourism entrepreneurs according to their social capital resources. Parametric and non-parametric tests are then applied to profile ‘social capital clusters’ of firms and examine key differences across business and owner characterises, as well business performance and future growth outlooks. Post-survey in-depth interviews with seven entrepreneurs from the survey sample were conducted to help validate and explain the findings of the quantitative analysis. Through this approach, the study contributes to the body of knowledge on tourism entrepreneurship, social networks, and social capital by understanding the configurations of tourism entrepreneur's offline and online social capital in a single study, and the subsequent implications these configurations have with regards to tourism enterprise performance.

Section snippets

Entrepreneurial social capital

Social capital is defined as the actual and potential resources available through an actor's network of relationships with others (Stam et al., 2014). These ‘others’ refer to people an actor knows or, who are known by the people that an actor knows (Greve & Salaff, 2003). Such connections can serve as resources/assets to help achieve certain objectives (Burt, 1992; 2000). Social capital is an important resource in entrepreneurship as it provides access to other resources including financial

Methodology

The research questions are examined through a mixed methods approach using both quantitative and qualitative methods. This enables ‘complementarity’, exploring different facets of the same complex phenomenon to provide a deeper understanding of the issue under study (Greene, 2007), as well as ‘triangulation’ through corroboration of inferences (Teddlie & Tahsakkori, 2009). The mixed methods approach followed an explanatory sequential design (c.f. Kallmuenzer, Kraus, Peters, Steiner, & Cheng,

Cluster analysis

To segment the tourism SMEs based on their online and offline social networking practices, hierarchical cluster analysis using the z-scores of the thirty two offline and online social capital measures, the Ward clustering algorithm, and the squared Euclidean distance was conducted. The agglomeration coefficient usually indicates too few clusters as a solution because maximum heterogeneity is reached when moving from a two to one cluster solution (Milligan & Cooper, 1985). Thus, the three

Discussion

This study addresses two fundamental research questions with regards to tourism entrepreneurship and social capital. RQ1 concerns the configurations of tourism entrepreneurs’ offline (personal, professional, associative, institutional networks) and online (Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Instagram connections) social capital connections. Results of the cluster analyses on data collected from 285 tourism entrepreneurs in New Zealand identified and supported three distinct clusters of tourism

Conclusion

This study expands on the body of knowledge on tourism entrepreneurship by uncovering: 1) configurations of tourism entrepreneurs online and offline social capital, and 2) the outcomes of social capital configurations on tourism firms' performance outlook. Our analysis revealed three distinct clusters of tourism entrepreneurs based on their social capital configurations. The first cluster (Active Online Networkers) developed social capital through online networks, with a lesser focus on face to

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Craig Lee: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Rob Hallak: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the University of Otago Research Grant Scheme, University of Otago, New Zealand for providing the funding to conduct this research.

Dr Craig Lee is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Tourism, University of Otago. His research interests lie in the fields of innovation and entrepreneurships in hospitality and tourism, with the goal of identifying how these two factors can enhance the performance of small and medium sized enterprises. His work in this area, applying quantitative and qualitative methods, has been published in leading academic journals. Across his teaching experience he has taught hospitality and tourism

References (56)

  • I.S. Lo et al.

    Tourism and online photography

    Tourism Management

    (2011)
  • Q. Luo et al.

    Using social network analysis to explain communication characteristics of travel-related electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites

    Tourism Management

    (2015)
  • G.B. Murphy et al.

    Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research

    Journal of Business Research

    (1996)
  • A.-S.T. Olanrewaju et al.

    Social media and entrepreneurship research: A literature review

    International Journal of Information Management

    (2020)
  • S. Quinton et al.

    Tensions and ties in social media networks: Towards a model of understanding business relationship development and business performance enhancement through the use of Linked

    Industrial Marketing Management

    (2016)
  • T. Sigfusson et al.

    Building international entrepreneurial virtual networks in cyberspace

    Journal of World Business

    (2013)
  • C. Smith et al.

    Embracing digital networks: Entrepreneurs' social capital online

    Journal of Business Venturing

    (2017)
  • W. Stam et al.

    Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators

    Journal of Business Venturing

    (2014)
  • H. Zheng et al.

    The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US

    Information & Management

    (2014)
  • P.S. Adler et al.

    Social capital: Prospects for a new concept

    Academy of Management Review

    (2002)
  • A. BarNir et al.

    Interfirm alliances in the small business: The role of social networks

    Journal of Small Business Management

    (2002)
  • N.K. Baym

    Personal connections in the digital age

    (2010)
  • N. Bosma et al.

    The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of start-ups

    Small Business Economics

    (2004)
  • V. Braun et al.

    Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Qualitative Research in Psychology

    (2006)
  • R.S. Burt

    Structural holes: The social structure of competition

    (1992)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.)

    (1988)
  • G.G. Dess et al.

    Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit

    Strategic Management Journal

    (1984)
  • A.A. Díaz et al.

    World internet project: The internet in New Zealand 2017

    (2018)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Virtual interviews vs. LinkedIn profiles: Effects on human resource managers’ initial hiring decisions

      2023, Tourism Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      How do HR managers' assessments of a job candidate in the first TMI affect their hiring decisions? Besides TMIs, more HR managers begin using job candidates' social media profiles to assess their qualifications and overall organizational fit (Bohnert & Ross, 2010; Janta et al., 2012; Lee & Hallak, 2020; Kwok & Muñiz, 2021). Roth et al. (2016) defined such a process of collecting online information from social networking sites (SNS) for employment assessment as “social media assessments.”

    • The role of cybersecurity and policy awareness in shifting employee compliance attitudes: Building supply chain capabilities

      2022, International Journal of Information Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      The survey questions were also separated. For example, questions about demographic characteristics were first presented, followed by questions on the measurement items in the conceptual model (Lee C, 2020). Statistically, the study followed the approach by Liang et al. (2007), using the unmeasured latent construct method.

    • Destination endorsers raising on short-form travel videos: Self-image construction and endorsement effect measurement

      2022, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      The present research is conducted with a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Mixed methods follow an explanatory sequential design and can achieve complementarity, enabling a more comprehensive exploration of the complexity of the question (Lee & Hallak, 2020). This paper aims to identify the features of endorsers and the influencing factors of endorsement effectiveness in short-form travel videos scenarios via two studies.

    • Cases on social media and entrepreneurship

      2024, Cases on Social Media and Entrepreneurship
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dr Craig Lee is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Tourism, University of Otago. His research interests lie in the fields of innovation and entrepreneurships in hospitality and tourism, with the goal of identifying how these two factors can enhance the performance of small and medium sized enterprises. His work in this area, applying quantitative and qualitative methods, has been published in leading academic journals. Across his teaching experience he has taught hospitality and tourism subjects related to research methods, enterprise management, entrepreneurship and small business, festivals and event management, marketing, and business ethics.

    Dr Rob Hallak is an Associate Professor in Management at UniSA Business, University of South Australia. He specialises in the area of entrepreneurship and firm performance within the tourism, hospitality and events sectors. Rob has successfully managed research and consultancy projects focusing on entrepreneurial behaviours, innovation, human capital and the drivers of small business performance. His recent projects include a comparative study of the upscale restaurant sector in Australia and France and a new study examining the supply and demand of healthy meals in Australia's foodservice sectors.

    View full text