Review
The F-techniques: advances in receptor protein studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2008.02.004Get rights and content

Recent developments in advanced microscopy techniques, the so-called F-techniques, including Förster resonance energy transfer, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and fluorescence lifetime imaging, have led to a wide range of novel applications in biology. The F-techniques provide quantitative information on biomolecules and their interactions and give high spatial and temporal resolution. In particular, their application to receptor protein studies has led to new insights into receptor localization, oligomerization, activation and function in vivo. This review focuses on the application of the F-techniques to the study of receptor molecules and mechanisms in the last three years and provides information on new modalities that will further improve their applicability and widen the range of biological questions that can be addressed.

Introduction

The maintenance and survival of multicellular organisms require an efficient system of cell–cell communication to coordinate the wide range of physiological processes that occur within an organism. This communication is performed by signaling pathways that are initiated by ligands binding to their target membrane receptors. The receptor–ligand complex then transduces the message to the cell interior. Because physiological and molecular functions measured in vitro and in vivo can show significant differences [1], it is necessary to measure receptor function in vivo over extended periods with high temporal and spatial resolution. Fluorescence techniques provide several advantages compared with other biophysical and biochemical methods for measuring receptor function. First, fluorescence intensity is linearly dependent on the number of fluorophores in a sample, providing a basis for quantitative measurements. Second, fluorescence measurements possess a very high sensitivity and thus can be performed on single molecules, providing the opportunity to observe biological mechanisms on a molecular level. Third, fluorescence is a process characterized by a range of different parameters, which can be measured independently or in combination (e.g. intensity, wavelength, fluorophore lifetime, polarization), providing information not only on the mere presence of a fluorophore but also on its orientation and its immediate environment. And finally, these techniques can be used in live cells. Here, we review the progress made over the last three years in fluorescence techniques for the study of receptor proteins. We concentrate on advanced fluorescence techniques, termed F-techniques, including Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), fluorescence correlation and cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCS and FCCS, respectively) and fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) and their application to the observation of receptor protein localization, oligomerization, activation and function in vivo.

Section snippets

Förster or fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)

FRET, the molecular process of energy transfer between two molecules, was first described by Förster in 1948 [2]. This technique can be used to measure the proximity of two fluorescently labeled molecules at a distance of less than 10 nm, by measuring the FRET efficiency, which is strongly dependent on the distance between the molecules (Box 1). Since the usefulness of FRET as a molecular ruler was shown in 1967 by Stryer and Haugland [3], FRET has developed into one of the preferred methods for

Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)

FLIM was first used in cells to measure the spatial distribution of fluorescence lifetimes [44] (Box 2). Because the lifetime of a fluorophore depends on its local environment, any parameter that has an influence on the lifetime can be mapped with optical resolution. Polarity, pH, ion concentrations or energy transfer between fluorophores can be measured, depending on the fluorophores used and their sensitivity to particular parameters. For a general review on FLIM instrumentation and usages,

Fluorescence correlation and cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCS and FCCS)

FCS and FCCS are single-molecule-sensitive techniques that record and evaluate the fluorescence signal from a small observation volume (Box 3). The review by Krichevsky and Bonnet discusses FCS [59], and FCCS has been reviewed in Refs 60, 61. The power of FCS lies in its access to processes on the single molecule level, while at the same time statistically evaluating many single events via correlation functions. The most common parameters extracted from FCS are the diffusion coefficient or flow

Fluorophores

Fluorescence labeling of biomolecules in vivo is difficult and requires extensive tests on possible influences of the labeling on protein function. Using several labeling approaches in parallel is therefore often a very time consuming, and sometimes unrealistic, option. Therefore, in recent years, researchers have adapted the F-techniques to the most common fluorescent tags even though these tags might not always be the best choice in terms of signal-to-noise ratio. One of the most common

Conclusions

It is clear that the F-techniques have been able to resolve important questions regarding the role of protein dynamics in biology. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics as well as the applications of the F-techniques in recent years. Instruments are commercially available to measure FRET, FLIM and FCS, but new developments occur at an unprecedented rate, and measurements are invariably facilitated by customized instruments. The application of the F-techniques to three-dimensional systems, such

Acknowledgement

This work was funded by the Singapore Bioimaging Consortium (SBIC-003/2005). We thank Xianke Shi and Sudhaharan Thankiah for cell images.

References (91)

  • K.A. Eidne

    Applications of novel resonance energy transfer techniques to study dynamic hormone receptor interactions in living cells

    Trends Endocrinol. Metab.

    (2002)
  • Y. Li

    Kinetics of complexin binding to the SNARE complex: Correcting single molecule FRET measurements for hidden events

    Biophys. J.

    (2007)
  • G. Milligan

    Oligomeric structure of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor: Comparisons with rhodopsin

    Vision Res.

    (2006)
  • S. Hohng

    Single-molecule three-color FRET

    Biophys. J.

    (2004)
  • J.R. Lakowicz

    Fluorescence lifetime imaging of intracellular calcium in Cos cells using Quin-2

    Cell Calcium

    (1994)
  • R. Ramadass

    Spectrally and spatially resolved fluorescence lifetime imaging in living cells: TRPV4–microfilament interactions

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (2007)
  • M. Peter

    Multiphoton-FLIM quantification of the EGFP–mRFP1 FRET pair for localization of membrane receptor-kinase interactions

    Biophys. J.

    (2005)
  • A.H.A. Clayton

    Ligand-induced dimmer–tetramer transition during the activation of the cell surface epidermal growth factor receptor-A multidimensional microscopy analysis

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • I.D. Peltan

    Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) detects stimulus-dependent phosphorylation of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) in primary neurons

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2006)
  • M. Offterdinger

    Imaging phosphorylation dynamics of the epidermal growth factor receptor

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • A.M. Davey

    Membrane order and molecular dynamics associated with IgE receptor cross-linking in mast cells

    Biophys. J.

    (2007)
  • N. Cahuzac

    Fas ligand is localized to membrane rafts, where it displays increased cell death-inducing activity

    Blood

    (2006)
  • P. Liu

    Investigation of the dimerization of proteins from the epidermal growth factor receptor family by single wavelength fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy

    Biophys. J.

    (2007)
  • S. Saffarian

    Oligomerization of the EGF receptor investigated by live cell fluorescence intensity distribution analysis

    Biophys. J.

    (2007)
  • F. Philip

    Signaling through a G protein-coupled receptor and its corresponding G protein follows a stoichiometrically limited model

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2007)
  • S. Hossain

    Binding of the Alzheimer amyloid beta-peptide to neuronal cell membranes by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

    Exp. Mol. Pathol.

    (2007)
  • J. Ries et al.

    Studying slow membrane dynamics with continuous wave scanning fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

    Biophys. J.

    (2006)
  • D.R. Sisan

    Spatially resolved fluorescence correlation spectroscopy using a spinning disk confocal microscope

    Biophys. J.

    (2006)
  • B.K. Muller

    Pulsed interleaved excitation

    Biophys. J.

    (2005)
  • L.C. Hwang

    Simultaneous multicolor fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy to detect higher order molecular interactions using single wavelength laser excitation

    Biophys. J.

    (2006)
  • C. Lipinski et al.

    Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine

    Nature

    (2004)
  • T. Förster

    Intermolecular energy migration and fluorescence

    Ann. Phys. (Leipzig)

    (1948)
  • L. Stryer et al.

    Energy transfer: a spectroscopic ruler

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

    (1967)
  • G. Valentin

    Photoconversion of YFP into a CFP-like species during acceptor photobleaching FRET experiments

    Nat. Methods

    (2005)
  • R.J. Brown

    Model for growth hormone receptor activation based on subunit rotation within a receptor dimer

    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.

    (2005)
  • A. Gertler

    Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy in living cells as a novel tool for the study of cytokine action

    J. Dairy Res.

    (2005)
  • M. Nobles

    Heterotrimeric G proteins precouple with G protein-coupled receptors in living cells

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

    (2005)
  • O. Kraetke

    Dimerization of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 is not coupled to ligand binding

    J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res.

    (2005)
  • G. Milligan

    The specificity and molecular basis of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor and CXCR chemokine receptor dimerization

    J. Mol. Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • B.H. Meyer

    FRET imaging reveals that functional neurokinin-1 receptors are monomeric and reside in membrane microdomains of live cells

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

    (2006)
  • B. Giese

    Dimerization of the cytokine receptors gp130 and LIFR analysed in single cells

    J. Cell Sci.

    (2005)
  • E. Biener

    Quantitative FRET imaging of leptin receptor oligomerization kinetics in single cells

    Biol. Cell

    (2005)
  • J.M. Kramer

    Cutting edge: Evidence for ligand-independent multimerization of the IL-17 receptor

    J. Immunol.

    (2006)
  • P. Hernanz-Falcon

    Identification of amino acid residues crucial for chemokine receptor dimerization

    Nat. Immunol.

    (2004)
  • G. Ramanoudjame

    Allosteric mechanism in AMPA receptors: A FRET-based investigation of conformational changes

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

    (2006)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Automated selection of regions of interest for intensity-based FRET analysis of transferrin endocytic trafficking in normal vs. cancer cells

      2014, Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, the development of novel quantitative imaging techniques is crucial to increase our understanding of the regulation of the intracellular endocytic trafficking of membrane receptors in both normal and cancer cells. Recently, Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based imaging approaches have been developed to assay receptor dimerization/oligomerization as well as receptor–ligand interactions during endocytic trafficking pathways [13–16]. In particular, a quantitative FRET assay has been used to follow the endocytic/recycling trafficking of transferrin receptor (TFR) and its respective ligand, iron-bound transferrin (Tfn), at nanometer range resolution [17–22].

    • Insights into subunit interactions within the insect olfactory receptor complex using FRET

      2013, Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Typically the fluorophores are modified versions of the Green Fluorescent Protein, such as Cyan Fluorescent Protein (CFP) and Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP), which are fused to the protein of interest. For integral membrane proteins, resonance energy transfer methods (e.g. FRET and BRET) have been used to detect homomeric and heteromeric interactions among receptor subunits, with several examples from GPCRs (Liu et al., 2008; Mercier et al., 2002; Pfleger and Eidne, 2005). We use intermolecular FRET by acceptor photobleaching to confirm homomeric and heteromeric interactions between Orco and the ligand-binding OR, Or22a.

    • Single cell analysis of ligand binding and complex formation of interleukin-4 receptor subunits

      2011, Biophysical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is still medical need for improvement in understanding and manipulating cytokine and growth factor signaling (1). Fostered by the continuous expansion and development of new microscopic fluorescence-based methods in the last decade, cell biologists now have access to a broad spectrum of powerful tools to analyze molecular mechanisms at the single cell level (2–4). Within the various approaches to investigate protein-protein interactions in live cells, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) is distinguished by providing dynamic information over a broad range of timescales and single-molecule sensitivity (5).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text