ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Theoretical Computer Science
Volume 345, Issue 1, 21 November 2005, Pages 139-170
Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS 2004)
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (302 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.07.033    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Model checking discounted temporal propertiesstar, open

Luca de Alfaroa, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Marco Faellaa, Thomas A. Henzingerb, c, Rupak Majumdard and Mariëlle Stoelingae

aCE, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA bEECS, University of California, Berkeley, USA cComputer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, Switzerland dCS, University of California, Los Angeles, USA eEWI, University of Twente, The Netherlands

Available online 29 August 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Temporal logic is two-valued: formulas are interpreted as either true or false. When applied to the analysis of stochastic systems, or systems with imprecise formal models, temporal logic is therefore fragile: even small changes in the model can lead to opposite truth values for a specification. We present a generalization of the branching-time logic CTL which achieves robustness with respect to model perturbations by giving a quantitative interpretation to predicates and logical operators, and by discounting the importance of events according to how late they occur. In every state, the value of a formula is a real number in the interval [0,1], where 1 corresponds to truth and 0 to falsehood. The boolean operators and and or are replaced by min and max, the path quantifiers there exists and for all determine sup and inf over all paths from a given state, and the temporal operators open diamond and specify sup and inf over a given path; a new operator averages all values along a path. Furthermore, all path operators are discounted by a parameter that can be chosen to give more weight to states that are closer to the beginning of the path.

We interpret the resulting logic DCTL over transition systems, Markov chains, and Markov decision processes. We present two semantics for DCTL: a path semantics, inspired by the standard interpretation of state and path formulas in CTL, and a fixpoint semantics, inspired by the μ-calculus evaluation of CTL formulas. We show that, while these semantics coincide for CTL, they differ for DCTL, and we provide model-checking algorithms for both semantics.

Keywords: Logic; Model checking; Quantitative systems; Discounting; CTL


Theoretical Computer Science
Volume 345, Issue 1, 21 November 2005, Pages 139-170
Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS 2004)
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.