ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Theoretical Computer Science
Volume 341, Issues 1-3, 5 September 2005, Pages 216-246
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (384 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.04.006    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Topology matters: Smoothed competitiveness of metrical task systemsstar, open

Guido Schäfera, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Naveen Sivadasanb, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aDipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Via Salaria 113, 00198 Rome, Italy bStrand Genomics, 273, Sir C.V. Raman Avenue, Rajmahal Vilas, Bangalore 560080, India

Received 22 February 2005; 
accepted 20 April 2005. 
Communicated by G. Ausiello. 
Available online 15 June 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Borodin et al. (J. ACM 39 (1992) 745) introduced metrical task systems, a framework to model a large class of online problems. Metrical task systems can be described as follows. We are given a graph G=(V,E) with n nodes and a positive edge length λ(e) for every edge eset membership, variantE. An online algorithm resides in G and has to service a sequence of tasks that arrive online. A task τ specifies for each node vset membership, variantV a request cost View the MathML source. If the algorithm resides in node u before the arrival of task τ, the cost to service task τ in node v is equal to the shortest path distance from u to v plus the request cost r(v). The objective is to service all tasks at minimum total cost. Borodin et al. showed that every deterministic online algorithm has a competitive ratio of at least 2n-1, independent of the underlying metric. Moreover, they presented an online work function algorithm (WFA) that achieves this competitive ratio.

We present a smoothed competitive analysis of WFA. That is, given an adversarial task sequence, we randomly perturb the request costs and analyze the competitive ratio of WFA on the perturbed sequence. Here, we are mainly interested in the asymptotic behavior of WFA. Our analysis reveals that the smoothed competitive ratio of WFA is much better than O(n) and that it depends on several topological parameters of the underlying graph G, such as the minimum edge length λmin, the maximum degree Δ, the edge diameter emax, etc. For example, if the ratio between the maximum and the minimum edge length of G is bounded by a constant, the smoothed competitive ratio of WFA is O(emax(λmin/σ+log(Δ))) and View the MathML source, where σ denotes the standard deviation of the smoothing distribution. That is, already for perturbations with σ=Θ(λmin) the competitive ratio reduces to O(log(n)) on a clique and to View the MathML source on a line. Furthermore, we provide lower bounds on the smoothed competitive ratio of any deterministic algorithm. We prove two general lower bounds that hold independently of the underlying metric. Moreover, we show that our upper bounds are asymptotically tight for a large class of graphs.

We also provide the first average case analysis of WFA. We prove that WFA has O(log(Δ)) expected competitive ratio if the request costs are chosen randomly from an arbitrary non-increasing distribution with standard deviation σ=Θ(λmin).

Keywords: Online algorithms; Competitive analysis; Smoothed analysis; Metrical task systems; Work function algorithm


Theoretical Computer Science
Volume 341, Issues 1-3, 5 September 2005, Pages 216-246
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.