Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Note
Received 30 April 2004;
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
We initiate the study of quantifying the quantumness of a quantum circuit by the number of gates that do not preserve the computational basis, as a means to understand the nature of quantum algorithmic speedups. Intuitively, a reduction in the quantumness requires an increase in the amount of classical computation, thus giving a “quantum and classical tradeoff”.
In this paper we present two results on this measure of quantumness. The first gives almost matching upper and lower bounds on the question: “what is the minimum number of non-basis-preserving gates required to generate a good approximation to a given state”. This question is the quantum analogy of the following classical question, “how many fair coins are needed to generate a given probability distribution”, which was studied and resolved by Knuth and Yao in 1976 [Algorithms and Complexity: New Directions and Recent Results, Academic Press, New York, 1976, pp. 357–428]. Our second result shows that any quantum algorithm that solves Grover's Problem of size n using k queries and ℓ levels of non-basis-preserving gates must have kℓ=Ω(n).
Keywords: Quantum computation; Quantum state generation; Quantum lower bound; Grover's Algorithm







E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (1)






