ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Theoretical Computer Science
Volume 344, Issues 2-3, 17 November 2005, Pages 335-345
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (135 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.03.053    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Note

Quantum and classical tradeoffsstar, open

Yaoyun ShiE-mail The Corresponding Author

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122, USA

Received 30 April 2004; 
revised 15 March 2005; 
accepted 15 March 2005. 
Communicated by J. Watrous. 
Available online 27 April 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

We initiate the study of quantifying the quantumness of a quantum circuit by the number of gates that do not preserve the computational basis, as a means to understand the nature of quantum algorithmic speedups. Intuitively, a reduction in the quantumness requires an increase in the amount of classical computation, thus giving a “quantum and classical tradeoff”.

In this paper we present two results on this measure of quantumness. The first gives almost matching upper and lower bounds on the question: “what is the minimum number of non-basis-preserving gates required to generate a good approximation to a given state”. This question is the quantum analogy of the following classical question, “how many fair coins are needed to generate a given probability distribution”, which was studied and resolved by Knuth and Yao in 1976 [Algorithms and Complexity: New Directions and Recent Results, Academic Press, New York, 1976, pp. 357–428]. Our second result shows that any quantum algorithm that solves Grover's Problem of size n using k queries and levels of non-basis-preserving gates must have kℓ=Ω(n).

Keywords: Quantum computation; Quantum state generation; Quantum lower bound; Grover's Algorithm


Theoretical Computer Science
Volume 344, Issues 2-3, 17 November 2005, Pages 335-345
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.