Elsevier

Talanta

Volume 148, 1 February 2016, Pages 7-16
Talanta

Inferential monitoring of chlorinated solvents through Raman spectroscopic observation of the vibrational modes of water

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.10.055Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Direct and indirect Raman spectroscopic means to assess TCE in aqueous solutions are contrasted.

  • OH stretching Raman vibrations of water are observed to be inversely related to TCE concentration.

  • Detection mechanism takes advantage of the influence of chlorine on the vibrational modes of water.

  • Water Raman line at 3393 cm−1 9x greater sensitivity to TCE than study of TCE Raman lines.

  • Tests on simulated biodegraded field samples demonstrate indirect detection in complex samples.

Abstract

Recent improvements in diode laser, fiber optic, and data acquisition technology have rejuvenated interest in field applications of Raman spectroscopy in a wide range of settings. One such application involves the observation of chlorinated solvents to facilitate the practice of "monitored natural attenuation." In this context, this manuscript focuses on means to improve the sensitivity of in-situ Raman analysis of chlorinated solvents. In particular, the work explores the performance limits of a Time-Resolved Raman Spectroscopy (TRRS) system employed to observe chlorinated solvents in aqueous samples via laboratory tests conducted on both liquid standards of trichloroethylene (TCE) and simulated biodegraded field samples. Quantitative assessment of TCE in solution is carried out through both direct observation of TCE Raman functional groups (381 cm−1 (δ skeletal), 840 cm−1 (νCCl) and 1242 cm−1 (δCH)) and indirect observation of the broad OH stretching (2700–3800 cm−1) Raman modes of water. Results from tests on simple solutions show that the TRRS system can detect TCE at aqueous concentrations as low as 70ppm by directly monitoring the 381 cm−1 TCE line, whereas observation of the OH stretching line of water (3393 cm−1) provides an indirect indication of TCE presence with nearly a 9× improvement in detection level. This unique and counterintuitive mechanism to detect the presence of chlorinated compounds in solution takes advantage of the influence of chlorine on the vibrational modes of water. This influence, which is believed to be attributed to the formation of hydrogen bonds and their resultant interactions with the solvation shell, may serve as a more sensitive and robust indication of the presence of aggregate chlorinated solvent contamination in aqueous systems. Tests performed on simulated biodegraded field samples demonstrate that the indirect detection mechanism is apparent even in complex samples representative of typical field conditions.

Introduction

Production and environmental release of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons peaked between the late eighties and early nineties. Due to their widespread use in the production of household products, degreasing operations, and petroleum refining, chlorinated solvents have become ubiquitous pollutants. According to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Toxic Chemical Release Inventory, between 1987 and 1993, releases to water and land of trichloroethylene (TCE), 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), Dichloromethane (DCM), and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA) totaled over 1.7 million kg, representing only a subset of all chlorinated solvents. These contaminants are still known to persist in the environment and it has been reported that up to 34% of the drinking water supply sources in the U.S. likely contain TCE contamination [1]. Compounds such as trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE) are found at approximately 80% of all Superfund sites with groundwater contamination (852 facilities) and more than 3000 Department of Defense (DoD) sites in the U.S. [2]. The net result is that these solvents pose a considerable threat as groundwater contaminants and account for a significant proportion of the 90+ drinking water contaminants listed by the EPA [3], [4].

Chlorinated solvents are Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) and by definition are denser than water and thus when spilled or released into the environment tend to migrate downward in the subsurface. Their migration through the vadose zone can lead to residual pockets of contaminants in soil pore spaces (source zones), the release of vapors in soil pore space, dissolution in groundwater (to the extent possible) in the capillary fringe and below the groundwater table, and pooling above an aquitard, as well as continued infiltration into fractures in boundary rock layers. The tendency for these compounds to partition makes them an exceptionally menacing pollutant. While the fate and transport of the dissolved fractions are influenced by phenomenon such as groundwater advection, mechanical dispersion, molecular diffusion, and groundwater-porous media chemical partitioning, movement of the compounds can be significantly influenced by gravity and capillary effects that make it difficult to adequately characterize and track their presence in the subsurface [5]. The sporadic and localized concentration of chlorinated solvents in soil pores and retarded pools also serves as a recalcitrant contaminant source which can often frustrate remediation attempts.

The unique challenges posed by chlorinated solvent DNAPLs in the geoenvironment have led both the U.S. EPA and the National Academy of Sciences to conclude that “DNAPL sources may be contained, but remediation to typical cleanup levels for most DNAPL sites is often ‘technically impracticable'” at justifiable costs [2]. This realization has increased attention to the potential to pursue “monitored natural attenuation” (MNA) rather than or in combination with proactive remediation at sites contaminated with chlorinated solvents [6]. This site management approach relies upon natural physical, chemical and biological processes to reduce contaminant concentrations [3]. Successful application of MNA typically requires extensive site analyses for initial screening for MNA potential, modeling and verification of attenuation processes, confirmation of effective MNA, and long term monitoring for any changes to the natural system that could alter the potential to achieve remediation goals [7], [8]. While initially conceived as a cost effective alternative to proactive remedial intervention it is becoming clear that the costs of site characterization and long term monitoring may be prohibitive, and so significant effort has been focused on developing more cost-effective approaches to carry out these tasks [8].

Currently, the technology used in common practice to assess contaminated site chlorinated solvent levels with actionable reliability involves either very costly and/or sophisticated laboratory instrumentation or expensive field instruments that can assess only a short-list of compounds, provide information over a limited spatial extent, and/or are too costly or complex to leave behind in long-term monitoring scenarios. Attempts to measure the effects of remediation efforts or the availability of attenuation mechanisms, for example to support mass balance evaluations of monitored natural attenuation, are even more challenging.

In the realm of laboratory measurements of chlorinated solvents and their daughter compounds, a host of wet chemistry techniques are applied. Chief amongst which are variants of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) that have been adapted to perform stable isotope analysis of carbon and chlorine to assess levels of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons while mitigating alteration of sample components resulting from pre-processing (e.g., Helium Microwave Induced Plasma MS to GC [9]; carrier gas extraction to GC [10]; multiple collector inductively coupled plasma-source mass spectrometry (MC-ICPMS) [11]. These techniques require field acquisition of samples (e.g., with devices such as the Waterloo profiler or precision injection/extraction probes [12]) and subsequent laboratory preparation and analysis – a time consuming and expensive process – yet yield highly chemical-specific results with great sensitivity (ppb or better).

In the field, remote sensing techniques (primarily satellite based) provide general information on field conditions or inferential indications of contaminant presence (such as foliage discoloration or depletion), yet offer limited resolution (typically several m2), and provide virtually no insight into subsurface conditions [13], [14]. Geophysical methods, such as reflectivity profiling (e.g., [15]), electrical resistivity imaging [16], and non-linear complex-resistivity cross-hole imaging [17], can successfully indicate the presence of chlorinated solvents in-situ, but typically at limited depths, spatial resolution, and sensitivity. Others have put forward concepts that involve the introduction of foreign materials, such as graphite, Zeolite, or Samms particles, into the subsurface to enhance geophysical signatures [18]. Portable GC/MS units have also emerged commercially [19], [20], but again require considerable sample handling. Other novel field approaches to chlorinated solvent evaluation include single point sensors that use replenishable reagents [21], or biosensors (e.g., [22], [23]), but any one sensor of this type tends to have limited versatility. Beyond these techniques, an array of indirect methods are employed to indicate the presence of DNAPLs such as chlorinated solvents including use of reactive inter-well tracers, radon flux sensors, soil vapor probes, and membrane interface probes that monitor related volatiles [24], [12]. However, these in-situ techniques tend to provide only directional input on the presence of contaminants or information over a very limited spatial extent.

In other cases, sensors are incorporated into cone penetrometer-type devices, and used to make direct field measurements. These instruments provide flexibility by enabling the investigator to rapidly examine multiple points in the field, both spatially and at depth, while limiting the errors that can often accompany sample extraction techniques, and thus their use has become increasingly common in practice. The majority of these penetrometer-based systems make use of optical spectroscopic phenomenon. Near-infrared (NIR) probes have been explored [25], [26], as well as optical fiber sensors that rely on evanescent field phenomenon. However, these devices apply only to compounds which absorb at the frequency of the excitation source [27], [28], [29], [30], [26], [31]. Ultra-violet (UV) Laser Induced Fluorescence (e.g., [32], [33], [34]) has also been explored, but has difficulty yielding chemical specific or quantitative insights due to the overlap of fluorescence signatures of similar compounds. Some of the most promising results in this arena stem from work done with continuous wave (CW) Raman spectroscopy which has been shown to yield highly specific chemical signatures even in complex in-situ settings (e.g., [35], [36], [37]). Effectiveness of Raman systems, however, has traditionally been adversely affected by fluorescence interference in natural environments [38], [39], [37]. More recently, Sinfield et al. [40] demonstrated the ability to significantly suppress the impact of fluorescence on Raman observations by employing pulsed-laser technology to perform Time Resolved Raman Spectroscopy and effectively gate Raman from fluorescence phenomenon in the time-domain, with a closed-path fiber optic system that could be incorporated in a penetrometer or field monitoring station.

Despite these advances, in-situ analyses, which are necessary for cost effective site management, inevitably involve tradeoffs between the time and cost associated with the analysis, and the degree to which the results represent actual field conditions and provide information of actionable quality. In particular, one of the biggest challenges with arguably the most versatile of the optical techniques, Raman spectroscopy, is its overall sensitivity.

In early work by Bilodeau et al. [35], direct Raman analysis was performed on samples of Ottawa sand and two NIST soils, saturated with neat TCE, using the 488 nm line of a 100 mW Argon laser. In these studies the researchers reported clear evidence of the C–Cl vibrational mode at 628 cm−1, but the intensity of the Raman line did not correlate well to the soil mass fraction of the compound, indicating presence but providing little ability to quantify in-situ concentrations. In 1999, the USDOE [36] reported on the second generation of a cone-penetrometer equipped with a 785 nm CW Raman system (originally a 415 nm system) which was employed in two distinct in-situ settings to (a) evaluate DNAPL contaminated radioactive waste in large containment vessels and (b) assess DNAPL contamination directly in soils. For the in-tank tests, “the Raman probe demonstration resulted in more than 99 percent accuracy for compound identification and greater than 93 percent accuracy in identifying both the compounds and the concentration” for organic constituents above 20% by weight ( [36], p. 6 and 13). For the direct push soil tests, the Raman probe was reported to be effective at detecting PCE at the “highest levels of contamination” in saturated zones (∼1500 ppm by mass), and was less reliable in the vadose zone [36]). Later work by Rossabi et al. [37], [41], made use of a 300 mW 785 nm CW laser and demonstrated detection of TCE in-situ in proximity to a solvent storage tank at locations with depth that were later verified in the laboratory to contain concentrations of 200–750 ppm by mass TCE, but failed to detect TCE in other zones with concentrations on the order of 50 ppm by mass. No major advances in in-situ Raman analysis of chlorinated solvents have been reported for the last decade.

These initial studies helped define the value of even coarse in-situ Raman analysis and several commercially available cone-penetrometer Raman probe systems now exist. However, to date, these probes are generally used for rapid detect – non-detect profiling as detection limits have been high relative to chlorinated solvent concentrations typically present in the field (due to an inability to manage interference in the field) and the fact that the systems have traditionally used low resolution CCD detectors (limiting a system's ability to differentiate varying analyte concentrations).

Sites contaminated with chlorinated solvents frequently contain the pollutant at levels ranging from a neat state (e.g., [42]) to low ppb concentrations that exceed Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) drinking water standards (e.g., TCE MCL = 5 ppb), with aqueous concentrations of 3–500 ppm commonly encountered in groundwater [43], [44], [45]. By comparison, the detection levels reported in the historical studies noted above, which are on a mass of soil basis, are equivalent to ∼ 300–9000 ppm on a volume to volume basis in the pore fluid of a soil (assuming a typical range of soil void ratios from 0.3 to 1.2 for the soils studied). To this end, any improvements to the sensitivity and resolution of a monitoring technology can be very valuable to facilitate enhanced plume delineation, earlier warnings of contaminant release from a containment zone, and/or the design of more tailored monitoring approaches.

With this context in mind, herein, the authors put forward an approach to improve the overall sensitivity of Raman observations of chlorinated solvents through indirect measurements that take advantage of the influence of chlorine on the vibrational modes of water to indicate the presence of chlorinated compounds in solution. The technique is contrasted to direct observation of select Raman frequencies of TCE in simple aqueous solutions, and demonstrated in more complex samples which simulate a natural field condition.

Section snippets

Equipment

Experiments performed for the work reported herein were carried out using a research-oriented open-path variation of a closed-path fiber optically coupled time-resolved Raman spectroscopy system specifically designed for application in field settings. The system trades-off lower power and longer sampling times for reduced cost, simple reconfigurability, and the ability to manage multiple environmental interferences (e.g., fluorescence, turbidity, and soil–solution interface). Open- and

Overview of the Raman Phenomenon

Raman spectroscopy is an analytical technique in which a monochromatic light source (typically a laser) is directed toward a target and inelastic photon–molecule collisions are observed. The inelastically scattered photons display a change in energy from their initial state that is equivalent to the energy transferred between the incident photon and the sample, and corresponds to the vibrational and rotational energy states of the target molecule bonds. Conventionally these changes in energy,

Discussion of results

Experiments were performed to directly and indirectly assess TCE levels in aqueous solution. Observations from each approach are described in detail below.

Concluding remarks

The work presented in this paper contrasted direct and indirect means to assess TCE levels in aqueous solution using time-resolved Raman spectroscopy. The TRRS system employed herein was able to directly detect TCE at aqueous concentrations as low as 70 ppm in simple aqueous solution by monitoring the 381 cm−1 Raman line corresponding to the δCCl vibrational mode. This level of sensitivity, while notably above drinking water maximum contaminant limits, has value in certain field monitoring

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor Larry Nies of the School of Civil Engineering at Purdue University for his guidance in the preparation of the microbial bioassay employed in this effort.

This study is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant no. 0927112. This support is gratefully acknowledged. Note that the National Science Foundation played no part in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; or in the writing of this article.

References (90)

  • M. Kato et al.

    Effect of water and deuterated water on Raman spectra of chloroacetone: evidence for the conformational effect on hydration

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1998)
  • R. Li et al.

    Hydrogen bonded structure of water and aqueous solutions of sodium halides: a Raman spectroscopic study

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (2004)
  • M. Mathlouthi et al.

    Laser-Raman spectra of D-glucose and sucrose in aqueous solution

    Carbohydr. Res.

    (1980)
  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), Technical protocol for evaluation of natural attenuation of chlorinated...
  • SERDP (Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program), Annual Report DNAPL Source Zone Initiative. July...
  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), Drinking water contaminant candidate list and regulatory determinations –...
  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), Drinking water contaminant candidate list and regulatory determinations –...
  • ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council - Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids Team), An Introduction to...
  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), Superfund for students and teachers: common contaminants, September,...
  • SRNL (Savannah River National Laboratory)

    Characterization and Monitoring of Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Ground Water: A Systems Approach

    (2006)
  • B.W. Pack et al.

    Determination of halogenated hydrocarbons by helium microwave plasma torch time-of- flight mass spectrometry coupled to gas chromatography

    Anal. Chem.

    (1998)
  • M.R.M.D. Van Acker et al.

    GC/multiple collector-ICPMS method for chlorine stable isotope analysis of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons

    Anal. Chem.

    (2006)
  • M.L. Kram et al.

    DNAPL characterization methods and approaches, Part 1: Performance comparisons

    Ground Water Monit. Remediat.

    (2001)
  • J.K. Kruse et al.

    Remote sensing of nitrogen stress in creeping bentgrass

    Agron. J.

    (2006)
  • Y. Ge, J.A. Thomasson, R. Sui, Remote sensing of soil properties in precision agriculture: a review, in: Paper No....
  • T. Halihan et al.

    Drilling Not Able (to find) Precise Location of Solvents (DNAPLS)

    (2007)
  • R.E. Grimm et al.

    Nonlinear complex-resistivity survey for DNAPL at the savannah river site A-014 outfall

    J. Environ. Eng. Geophys.

    (2005)
  • T.J. Gilmore

    Micron-Sized “Sensors” to Monitor the Environment

    (2001)
  • J.H. Wahl et al.

    A portable multi-dimensional gas chromatographic system for field applications

    J. Sep. Sci.

    (2003)
  • P.F. Daley et al.

    Fiber optic sensor for continuous monitoring of chlorinated solvents in the vadose zone and in groundwater: field test results

    Proc. SPIE - Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.

    (1992)
  • C. Malandain et al.

    Biosensors for the environment

    Oil Gas Sci. Technol.

    (2005)
  • T.J. Pankow et al.

    Dense Chlorinated Solvents and Other DNAPLSs in Groundwater: History, Behavior, and Remediation

    (1996)
  • V. Acha et al.

    Detoxification of a mixture of aliphatic chlorinated hydrocarbons in a fixed-bed bioreactor: continuous on-line monitoring via an attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared sensor

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1999)
  • J. Buerck et al.

    Fiber optic NIR evanescent wave absorption sensor systems for in situ monitoring of hydrocarbon compounds in waste and ground water

    Proc. SPIE - Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.

    (1999)
  • M.D. Degrandpre et al.

    A fiber-optic FT-NIR evanescent field absorbance sensor

    Appl. Spectrosc.

    (1990)
  • J.P. Conzen et al.

    Characterization of a fiber-optic evanescent wave absorbance sensor for nonpolar organic compounds

    Appl. Spectrosc.

    (1993)
  • J. Lin et al.

    Subsurface contaminant monitoring by laser fluorescence excitation-emission spectroscopy in a cone penetrometer probe

    Proc. SPIE - Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.

    (1995)
  • J. Bloch et al.

    Field test of a novel microlaser-based probe for in-situ fluorescence sensing of soil contaminants

    Appl. Spectrosc.

    (1998)
  • M. Kram

    Use of SCAPS petroleum hydrocarbon sensor technology for real-time indirect DNAPL detection

    J. Soil. Contam.

    (1998)
  • T.G. Bilodeau et al.

    Fiber optic Raman probe detection of chlorinated hydrocarbons in standard soils

    Proc. SPIE- Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.

    (1994)
  • USDoE (U.S. Department of Energy), Raman Probe, DOE/EM-0442, July,...
  • J. Rossabi et al.

    Field tests of a DNAPL characterization system using cone penetrometer-based Raman spectroscopy

    Ground Water Monit. Remediat.

    (2000)
  • T.M. Miano et al.

    Flourescence spectroscopy of humic substances

    Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1988)
  • NFEC (Naval Facilities Engineering Command)

    Near-Real Time UV Fluorescence Technique For Characterization of PAHs in Marine Sediment - A Rapid Sediment Characterization (RSC) Tool

    (2000)
  • J.V. Sinfield et al.

    A low cost time-resolved spectroscopic sensing system enabling fluorescence rejection

    Appl. Spectrosc.

    (2010)
  • 1

    Present contact information: Senior Environmental Engineer, PEER Consultants, P.C., 1 North Charles Street, Suite 1900, Baltimore, MD 21201.

    View full text