Dispersive liquid—liquid microextraction for the determination of three cytokinin compounds in fruits and vegetables by liquid chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry
Introduction
Plant growth regulators (PGRs) are classified into five main classes: cytokinins (CKs), auxins, gibberellins, ethylene and abscisic acid [1]. Most of these compounds are naturally produced in plants, where they regulate the growth or destroy undesired parts of plants. Synthetic PGRs are widely sold for use in agriculture because of they are cheaper and show greater stability than the natural homologs [2], although their use in the European Union is governed by the Council Directive 91/414/EEC [3]. CKs, which were discovered during the 1950s, play an important role in several phases of plant development and growth, and are used to enhance fruit set, fruit size and the yield of different crops. The functions of CK receptors in plants have been reviewed recently [4]. The CK group comprises two types of compound: adenine and phenylurea derivatives [5]. The phenylureas comprise a group of synthetic compounds, the first one identified being 1,3-diphenylurea (1,3-DPU), whereas forchlorfenuron (CPPU) and thidiazuron (TDZ) were synthetized later and show higher activity than other natural PGRs, such as the adenine-type cytokinin zeatin [5].
The main effect of CPPU is to increase fruit size (e.g. kiwifruits, grapes and apples among others), and to promote the development of the ovary into fruit without fertilization or seed formation. CPPU acts synergistically with auxins. The correct application of this compound does not involve human risk and, moreover, CPPU has been classified as not likely to be a human carcinogen or endocrine disrupter [6]. In 2006, CPPU was included in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC of the European Union as an authorized PGR for kiwifruit, with a maximum residue limit of 50 ng g−1 [7]. TDZ, also classified as not likely to be a human carcinogen, has been used for chemical defoliation before the mechanical harvesting of cotton and for promoting plant growth [8], [9]. The effect of 1,3-DPU on callus induction on the surface of certain plants has been described [10], as well as its stimulatory effect on plants [11], although its cytokinin activity is 10,000 times lower than that of CPPU.
CPPU in fruit and vegetables can be determined by immunoassay procedures [12], [13], using liquid chromatography (LC) with UV detection [14], [15], [16], tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] and time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS) [22], [23]. However, the literature only shows two analytical methods for the determination of TDZ in fruit and vegetables: LC—UV detection [24] and LC—MS/MS [17], the latter also including the determination of CPPU. On the other hand, TDZ has been quantified in waters [8], [25], [26] and fertilizers [2]. Sample treatments in the cited references include extraction of the analytes into an organic solvent, and clean-up by liquid—liquid extraction (LLE) [14], solid-phase extraction (SPE) [15], [16], [21], [22] and dispersive solid-phase extraction (DSPE) [20], [23]. The simultaneous extraction and clean-up using QuEChERS methodology has also proved satisfactory [17], [19], [22]. In this study, we propose the simultaneous determination of CPPU, TDZ and 1,3-DPU in fruit and vegetables by solvent extraction of the analytes, with low consumption of the organic solvent and preconcentration of the extract by means of a miniaturized technique whose main advantages are its rapidity, efficacy, low cost and lack of memory effects: dispersive liquid—liquid microextraction (DLLME) [27], [28], [29], [30]. DLLME has only been applied for the determination of TDZ in water samples [26]. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that the simultaneous determination of the three phenylurea cytokinin compounds has been approached. Moreover, in this case, the same friendly sample treatment (DLLME) is proposed for the analysis of fruit and vegetables by LC—ESI—TOFMS.
Section snippets
Instrumentation
The LC system consisted of an Agilent G1312A (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) binary pump operating at a flow-rate of 0.8 mL min−1. The solvents were degassed using an on-line membrane system (Agilent G1379B). The column was maintained at ambient temperature in a thermostated compartment (Agilent G1316A). Separation was performed on a Tracer Extrasil ODS2 column (Teknokroma) (150 mm×4 mm, 5 µm), while injection (20 µL) was performed using an autosampler (Agilent G1367A). Autosampler vials of 2-mL
Liquid chromatographic separation
Reversed phase chromatography was used. The optimal separation conditions were established by injecting 20 μL of an aqueous standard solution containing the analytes at a concentration level of 1 µg mL−1, into the Tracer Extrasil ODS2 column. Different ACN/water mixtures were assayed as the mobile phase in isocratic mode at a 0.8 mL min−1 flow-rate, and the best separation was achieved with the mixture 40/60 (v/v), when the compounds were eluted with retention times of 4.06, 9.46 and 11.25 min for
Conclusion
This is the first time that TDZ, CPPU and 1,3-DPU have been determined simultaneously. A simple extraction of the analytes from the sample matrix using a low volume of organic solvent and preconcentration of the extract by the environmentally friendly miniaturized technique DLLME in conjunction LC with the sensitive TOFMS detection system, permit quantification of the analytes with low detection limits. Moreover, the selectivity of the detection system used provided unequivocal identification
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge to the Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia (CARM, Fundación Séneca, Project 15217/PI/10) and the Spanish MEC (CTQ2012-34722) for financial support. G. Férez-Melgarejo acknowledges a fellowship financed by CARM.
References (31)
- et al.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
(2012) - et al.
Chemosphere
(2003) - et al.
J. Chromatogr. A
(2007) - et al.
J. Chromatogr. A
(2006) - et al.
J. Chromatogr. A
(2006) - et al.
J. Chromatogr. A
(2010) - et al.
J. Chromatogr. A
(2011) - et al.
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plant Hormones
(1999) - et al.
J. AOAC Int.
(2008) - Regulation (EC) no. 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing...
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
J. Agric. Food Chem.
Cited by (32)
Effect of forchlorfenuron and thidiazuron on kiwifruits’ internal qualities, optical properties and their relationship during growth
2024, Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular SpectroscopyA sensitive silver nanoflower-based SERS sensor coupled novel chemometric models for simultaneous detection of chlorpyrifos and carbendazim in food
2022, LWTCitation Excerpt :Hence, it is expected that rice should be pesticide-free to ensure human health. These pesticide residues are routinely analyzed using gas chromatography (Berijani, Assadi, Anbia, Hosseini, & Aghaee, 2006; Lesueur, Gartner, Mentler, & Fuerhacker, 2008), high-performance liquid chromatography (Gui, Peng, He, Mmereki, & Pan, 2015; Wu et al., 2009), mass spectrometry (Campillo, Viñas, Ferez-Melgarejo, & Hernández-Córdoba, 2013), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Campillo et al., 2013), fluorometry (Liu, Wang, Han, & Feng, 2019) and electrochemical methods (Fu, An, Yao, Guo, & Sun, 2019; Verdian & Asma, 2017). However, in spite of these methods being extremely sensitive and stable, they are not suitable for rapid and real-time applications due to their exorbitant price for instruments, complexity in operation, and extended detection procedures, as well as the need for a skilled technician.
Imidazolium ionic-liquid-modified phenolic resin for solid-phase extraction of thidiazuron and forchlorfenuron from cucumbers
2020, Journal of Chromatography ACitation Excerpt :Widely used in crop production in many countries, thidiazuron (TDZ) and forchlorfenuron (CPPU) are benzoylurea plant hormones that regulate plant growth and development and promote fruit quality [1–4].
Simultaneous extraction of four plant growth regulators residues in vegetable samples using solid phase extraction based on thiol-functionalized nanofibers mat
2020, Food ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Therefore, it is desperately needed to develop an effective sample pretreatment method for the extraction and enrichment of PGRs before further instrumental analysis. Currently, several sample pretreatment methods have been established for detection of PGRs residues in various plants matrices, mainly including Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe methodology (QuEChERS) (Muhammad et al., 2018), dispersive solid phase extraction (DSPE) (Liu et al., 2016), dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) (Campillo, Viñas, Férez-Melgarejo, & Hernández-Córdoba, 2013), liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) (Tan, Li, Mao, Wan, & Qiu, 2016), microwaveassisted extraction (MAE) (Liu, Chen et al., 2015), and solid-phase extraction (SPE) (Cao et al., 2016; Orellana-Silla, Armenta, de la Guardia, Mercader, & Esteve-Turrillas, 2018). Among these methods, SPE is recognized as the most common pretreatment technique for the isolation of PGRs from complex sample matrices because of its high recovery, reproducibility, and simple operation.