Elsevier

Surface and Coatings Technology

Volume 370, 25 July 2019, Pages 163-176
Surface and Coatings Technology

Comparative study of the failure mechanism of atmospheric and suspension plasma sprayed thermal barrier coatings

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The SPS coatings showed segmented/columnar structure and good mechanical properties.

  • The SPS coatings generally failed prematurely in thermal shock test.

  • High-temperature exposure of the SPS coatings may lead to embrittlement.

  • The thermal shock performance depends on the change of the mechanical properties.

Abstract

Among numerous works on suspension plasma sprayed thermal barrier coatings, only a few focused on the relationship between the thermal shock resistance of SPS coatings and their mechanical properties. In this study, several SPS yttria-stabilized zirconia coatings were deposited with various spraying parameters including plasma gas composition, stand-off distance, and suspension formulation, then they were subjected to thermal cyclic test at 1150 °C. The results showed that despite segmented/columnar microstructure most of them failed after fewer cycles than the benchmark APS coating with conventional lamellar microstructure. Changes in the mechanical properties of the coatings such as Young's modulus and toughness after exposure to elevated temperature were evaluated. Most of the SPS coatings showed unusual change of mechanical properties, i.e., significant decrease of either Young's modulus or toughness or both. It was shown that such peculiar evolution of mechanical properties cannot be explained by the tetragonal to monoclinic transformation of YSZ, but it is rather related to the formation of very fine pores smaller 1 μm after heat treatment. The evolution of mechanical properties was linked with the results obtained in the thermal cyclic test, showing that thermal cycling resistance of SPS coatings was predominantly controlled by the mechanical properties after heat exposure, for which such phenomena as sintering-induced embrittlement may give crucial influence.

Introduction

Ceramic Thermal Barrier Coatings (TBCs) are widely used in hot sections of land-based gas turbines and aero-engines to increase the efficiency and extend the life of metallic components [[1], [2], [3]]. The primary function of the TBC system is to provide a low thermal conductivity barrier, allowing the temperature of metallic components to be kept moderate while increasing the operating gas temperature. Nowadays, YSZ-based TBCs are most widely used and fabricated either by Plasma Spraying (PS) or Electron Beam Physical Vapor Deposition (EB-PVD). Application of each method results in dissimilar and distinctive coatings microstructures. The PS coatings consist of lamellae of rapidly solidified YSZ particles called splats, and have low thermal conductivity due to a myriad of inter-splat voids and microcracks, while EB-PVD coatings typically show columnar microstructure, which exhibits low stiffness and high strain tolerance [[4], [5], [6], [7]].

Recently, a new method which might combine the benefits of both PS and EB-PVD has emerged. In Suspension Plasma Spraying (SPS) [[8], [9], [10]] particles in the size range of sub-micrometer to nanometer are suspended in water or organic solvent are used as a feedstock to realize fine microstructure with sub-micrometer splats and nano-porosity. These attributes of microstructure may greatly reduce the coating's thermal conductivity [11,12]. Previous studies have also demonstrated that various coating structures can be realized by the SPS process, including vertically cracked and columnar microstructure [13,14], which may result in significant improvement of compliance, durability, and lifespan of YSZ TBC. Despite these promising features and close attention paid to various aspects of SPS process, only a limited number of publications have focused on performance-related properties for TBC, such as thermal shock resistance or thermal stability [12,[15], [16], [17]]. There are even no unequivocal results showing the advantage of SPS coatings in thermal cycle lifetime over APS coatings. Results of several works dealing with thermal shock resistance of SPS coatings are summarized in Table 1.

Results presented in Table 1 shows very big discrepancy between results for SPS coatings even if they were reported in the same paper. Such a considerable variation may indicate that the performance of SPS coatings are highly sensitive to their microstructure [21] and mechanical properties, which in turn can significantly vary depended on deposition parameters such as substrate [12], size of ceramic powder [18,22], and concentration of solid phase in suspension [18]. Abundance of factors affecting SPS coating's performance makes difficult to determine differences between failure modes of SPS and APS or EB-PVD. However, some researchers made an effort to explain observed differences Zhai et al. [20], who have reported a superior lifetime of SPS coatings due to a columnar or segmented microstructure, which reduces thermal stress in a manner similar to the EB-PVD coatings. Also, results presented by Zhao et al. [19] showed a longer lifetime of SPS coatings and underlined that failure modes of the SPS and APS could be different. The SPS coatings failed by partial spallation of segments/columns, while the APS coatings failed by the bridging of interface delamination close to the bond coat/top coat interface and the intrinsic segmentation cracks. Other investigators have reported the opposite trend of APS coatings outperforming SPS ones. Such results were presented by Seshadri et al. [21] and Ganvir et al. [22], the latter of which suggested that the reason could be the high magnitude of deposition stresses, randomly oriented columnar features or presence of interpass porosity bands. To the best of the authors' knowledge, there is a very limited number of published study aimed at understanding of SPS coating's failure in a comprehensive manner.

Because the failure mechanism of SPS TBC has not been clarified yet, the current study aims to closely investigate this issue. Several SPS TBCs were sprayed with various spraying conditions and then tested in thermal cycle test. Microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stresses of the coatings were investigated in order to understand the thermal cycle performance of the SPS coatings.

Section snippets

Feedstock materials and spraying conditions

Two types of suspension of YSZ (8 wt% Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia) were used in this study. One of which was ethanol-based suspension with the powder loading of 25 wt%. For the suspension preparation commercially available fused and crushed powder (YSZ, Imerys Fused Minerals, Laufenburg, Germany) with a particle size < 2 μm (Fig. 1) and reagent grade ethanol (99.5%) as the solvent was used. The suspension was prepared by mixing the YSZ powder with ethanol, followed by ball milling for 24 h by

Microstructure

Cross-sectional microstructures of the as-sprayed coatings are presented in Fig. 3 with high-magnification images in the insets. For the APS coatings typical lamellar microstructure without vertical cracks is shown in Fig. 3a. At higher magnification pores and intersplat voids are visible. Microstructures of C1-50E and C2-70W coatings are presented in Fig. 3b and f, respectively, both of which exhibit relatively dense microstructure with deep vertical cracks (labeled “A”). Fig. 3b inset reveals

Discussion

There exists a large number of reports describing properties affecting the lifespan of TBCs under thermal cyclic or thermo-mechanical fatigue conditions. Many authors have emphasized the role of TGO growth and thermal expansion mismatch between the bond coat, TGO, and YSZ top coat, leading to high magnitude of residual stress in the TGO layer (1 GPa and more) and subsequent crack nucleation and growth [50]. Other researchers have found the cause of failure in sintering driven stiffening [64],

Conclusions

In this study, several SPS coatings were sprayed with various spraying conditions (spraying distance, plasma, output power, and by using two types of suspensions). Most of the SPS coatings failed after a smaller numbers of cycles than the benchmark APS coating. The majority of SPS coatings show short lifespan in spite of apparently columnar or segmented microstructure. Only one SPS coating – C1-70E – performed comparatively with the APS coating. Link between thermal cycle performance and

References (64)

  • Z. Zou et al.

    A comparative study on the performance of suspension plasma sprayed thermal barrier coatings with different bond coat systems

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2015)
  • R.S. Lima et al.

    Nanostructured YSZ thermal barrier coatings engineered to counteract sintering effects

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2008)
  • M. Gupta et al.

    Design of next generation thermal barrier coatings - experiments and modelling

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2013)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Thermal shock resistance and mechanical properties of La2Ce2O7 thermal barrier coatings with segmented microstructure

    Ceram. Int.

    (2009)
  • A. Jadhav et al.

    Thick ceramic thermal barrier coatings with high durability deposited using solution-precursor plasma spray

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2005)
  • Y. Yamazaki et al.

    The determination of the delamination resistance in thermal barrier coating system by four-point bending tests

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2006)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Columnar and DVC-structured thermal barrier coatings deposited by suspension plasma spray: high-temperature stability and their corrosion resistance to the molten salt

    Ceram. Int.

    (2016)
  • A.F. Renteria et al.

    Effect of ageing on microstructure changes in EB-PVD manufactured standard PYSZ top coat of thermal barrier coatings

    J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.

    (2006)
  • A. Bacciochini et al.

    Quantification of void network architectures of suspension plasma-sprayed (SPS) yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) coatings using ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering (USAXS)

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2010)
  • A.G. Evans et al.

    Mechanisms controlling the durability of thermal barrier coatings

    Progress in Materials Science

    (2001)
  • H. Zhao

    Z.Yu, H.N.G.Wadley, The influence of coating compliance on the delamination of thermal barrier coatings

    Surface and Coatings Technology

    (2010)
  • S. Wei et al.

    Lifetime prediction of plasma sprayed thermal barrier coatings systems

    Surface and Coatings Technology

    (2013)
  • H.Y. Qi et al.

    Computational analysis for understanding the failure mechanism of APS-TBC

    Computational Materials Science

    (2012)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Effects of processing conditions on the mechanical properties and deformation behaviors of plasma-sprayed thermal barrier coatings: Evaluation of residual stresses and mechanical properties of thermal barrier coatings on the basis of in situ curvature measurement under a wide range of spray parameters

    Acta Materialia

    (2013)
  • L. Yang et al.

    Evolution of residual stress in air plasma sprayed yttria-stabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings after isothermal treatment

    Surface and Coating Technology

    (2014)
  • Q. Chen et al.

    C.Lu, Effect of Young's modulus evolution on residual stress measurement of thermal barrier coatings by X-ray diffraction

    Applied Surface Science

    (2010)
  • R. Hamacha et al.

    Residual stress evolution during the thermal cycling of plasma-sprayed zirconia coatings

    Surface and Coating Technology

    (1996)
  • D.W. Jordan et al.

    X-ray residual stress analysis of a ceramic thermal barrier coating undergoing thermal cycling

    Thin Solid Films

    (1993)
  • M. Shinozaki et al.

    A methodology, based on sintering-inducted stiffening, for prediction of the spallation lifetime of plasma-sprayed coatings

    Acta Materialia

    (2013)
  • A. Ganvir et al.

    Failure analysis of thermally cycled columnar thermal barrier coatings produced by high-velocity-air fuel and axial-suspension-plasma spraying: a design perspective

    Ceram. Int.

    (2018)
  • D. Zhu et al.

    Thermal-barrier coatings for advanced gas-turbine engines

    MRS Bullietin

    (2000)
  • U.Schulz, S.Saruhan, K.Fritscher, C. Leyens. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology 1 (2004)...
  • Cited by (21)

    • Effects of internal oxide contents on the oxidation and β-phase depletion behaviour in HOVF CoNiCrAlY coatings

      2021, Surface and Coatings Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is shown that an initial heat treatment can minimise the formation of spinel oxides and allow a dense and continuous alumina scale to form at the coating surface [18–22]. It is also found that various microstructures that resulted from different deposition processes have a significant influence on the subsequent oxidation behaviour [23–28]. These studies range from electron beam physical vapour deposition (EB-PVD), plasma spray physical vapour deposition (PS-PVD), low pressure plasma spray (LPPS/VPS) and high velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF) spray.

    • Conjugate flow and heat transfer analysis between segmented thermal barrier coatings and cooling film

      2021, International Journal of Thermal Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      After the gains of such controlled structures, thermo-physical properties, such as thermal conductivities, thermal diffusivities and thermal shock and fatigue performances of the segmented TBCs were investigated in thermal cycling tests [15–17]. The results demonstrated that, TBCs with vertical segmentation cracks showed greater durability through added in-plane strain tolerance, thereby improving the coating life [18–20]. The current researches on segmented TBCs are limited to the exploration of the intrinsic properties (thermal conductivity, elastic modulus, etc.) of coating materials.

    • Effect of environmental pressure on the microstructure of YSZ thermal barrier coating via suspension plasma spraying

      2021, Journal of the European Ceramic Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      The resulting coating typically shows a considerable variation of the microstructure under different preparation conditions. In order to understand the deposition mechanism of this technology, many researchers investigated the effects of the associated preparation parameters on the coating, including solid loading, liquid medium, powder size, substrate roughness, etc. [17–20]. However, most SPS reports were carried out in the atmosphere.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text