Elsevier

Surface and Coatings Technology

Volume 329, 25 November 2017, Pages 202-211
Surface and Coatings Technology

Inhomogeneity of plastic deformation in austenitic stainless steel after surface mechanical attrition treatment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.09.049Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cold-rolled thin sheets with textured surfaces were subjected to SMAT.

  • SMAT causes inhomogeneous deformation in thin sheets.

  • Characteristic areas from treated material were chosen for examination.

  • Some of them contain significantly lower amount of α′-martensite phase.

  • The residual stresses may be either compressive or tensile depending on the area.

Abstract

Inhomogeneity of microstructure evolution in cold-rolled austenitic stainless steel after surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) was investigated. A characteristic deformation pattern was obtained for all studied specimens. Selected areas were examined through X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Estimation of the α′-martensite volume fraction below the treated surfaces showed, that some of the studied areas are characterised by significant different amount of this phase (from 10 to 22% - BB, from 19 to 31% - GIXD). The performed finite element (FE) numerical analysis showed, that the reason for this may be the presence of an air gap between the impacted material and fixation and also relatively short high stress time duration due to surface inclination during the surface treatment. Annealing at 550 and 650 °C greatly increased the volume fraction of α′-martensite (up to 47% - BB) and formed Fe2O3 as well as Fe3O4, whereas annealing at 700 °C resulted in both disappearance of α′-martensite and in reduction of oxides.

Introduction

Over the past decades, nanostructured and ultrafine-grained metallic materials have attracted considerable interest due to their remarkable improvement of mechanical strength [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. For this reason, they will probably find many applications in future structural engineering.

A disadvantage of such high strength materials is their lowered plasticity. However, this problem can be solved using recently developed ultrasonic-assisted surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) [7], [8], [9], [10]. It allows to refine the microstructure only at the surface, preserving the plasticity of the core.

In ultrasonic-assisted SMAT, spherical balls (steel, glass or ceramic) of relatively high hardness are placed in a vibrating chamber, which vibrates with a frequency from 20 Hz to 20 kHz. A sample, which surface is going to be treated, is placed at the upper side of the chamber and impacted by a large amount of flying balls. The kinetic energy of the impacting balls induces high plastic deformation at the specimen's surface resulting in grain refinement down to the nanometric scale without significant contamination or porosity [11], [12]. Moreover, as opposed to conventional shot peening [13], [14], in ultrasonic-assisted SMAT random directional impacts of the balls onto the sample surface facilitate the grain refinement process [7].

A nanocrystallised structure can be observed up to several tens of micrometers below the surface and, as the depth increases, a hardened transition zone is observed at the layer of about 200 μm depth characterised by a grain size gradient [8], [15], [16], [17]. Such limited volume fraction of the refined grains restricts thickness of the sample that is going to be processed by SMAT to value of the order of 1 mm. A greater thickness of the sample would result in obtaining the relatively low volume ratio of strengthened after SMAT and initial microstructure. As a consequence, it would cause only minor strength enhancement. Subsequently, plates subjected to SMAT can be joined together using any suitable thermo-mechanical process, for instance, accumulative roll bonding (ARB) [18], [19], [20]. Such duplex technique allows to obtain multilayered materials for structural applications with enhanced yield and ultimate strength, while conserving an acceptable elongation to failure. However, the metallic samples limited to about 1 mm thickness exhibit significant non-uniform change in shape during SMAT as a result of large residual stresses introduced by impacting balls (Fig. 1). In the earlier reported investigations of SMAT, such deformation inhomogeneity has not been taken into account [9], [12], [16], [18], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. However, as it is showed in this work, it has substantial impact on microstructure of the treated material that will inevitably be reflected in the obtained mechanical properties. This inhomogeneity may also have meaningful influence on the bonding mechanisms during subsequent thermo-mechanical processing affecting the quality of the final multilayered metallic material. In this paper, the microstructure evolution accounting for the inhomogeneity of plastic deformation during ultrasonic-assisted SMAT is studied.

A special emphasis was placed on the study of the strain-induced α′-martensite, as it increases the work-hardening capacity and has substantial influence on ductility of steels [26], [27], [28], [29]. In order to evaluate the possible microstructural changes during thermo-mechanical joining process, annealing studies of SMATed plates were performed at similar temperatures which are usually used in the second step of duplex technique. It allowed for observation of the changes in α′-martensite volume fraction depending on the heat treatment parameters and the area of the sample under consideration. The amount of α′-martensite significantly increased after annealing at relatively high temperatures proving high thermal stability of this phase in the SMATed material. The thermal stability may influence the bonding mechanisms during thermo-mechanical joining process affecting quality of the multilayered metallic structural materials.

The aim of this work is to investigate the conditions leading to inhomogeneity of plastic deformation in austenitic stainless steel after ultrasonic-assisted SMAT that can significantly affect the microstructure and mechanical properties of the treated material. The influence of non-uniform deformation on the volume content of α′-martensite has been studied. In order to investigate the stress distribution within the steel sample due to ball impact during SMAT, a finite element (FE) analysis was performed.

Section snippets

Experimental procedure

The cold rolled 1 mm thickness sheet of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel with initial grain size of 10 to 50 μm was used in the investigation. Its chemical composition is shown in Table 1. The temperature, at which 50% of the austenite transforms to martensite with 30% true strain Md30, the martensite start temperature Ms and the stacking fault energy (SFE) values for the considered material calculated according to equations based on the chemical composition are presented in Table 2. The SFE

Mechanism of grain refinement in austenitic stainless steel

The mechanism of surface nanocrystallization has been studied for various austenitic stainless steel grades. One of the most studied grades is 304 SS, for which the grain refinement process is based on formation of the planar dislocations arrays and twins; on twin-twin intersections leading to grain subdivision and martensite transformation; and on formation of randomly oriented crystallites [44]. The SFE of 304 SS is rather low, hence the twinning based mechanism is likely to be dominant. The

The cross-sectional morphology

SEM observations of the steel morphology were made using the specimen cross-sections. Fig. 2a–d illustrates the obtained microstructures under A1, B1, A2 and B2 surfaces subjected to SMAT for 30 min. Microstructures under A3 and B3 surfaces are very similar, hence they were not shown. It can be seen, that there are no significant differences in the cross-sectional morphology between each of the surfaces of the treated steel sample. The noticeable changes of microstructure occur at areas situated

Conclusions

Inhomogeneity of plastic deformation in cold-rolled 316L austenitic stainless steel after ultrasonic-assisted SMAT has been studied. In this work, a textured surface was taken into account. The detailed XRD investigation combining BB and GIXD geometries allowed for non-destructive studies carried out at different material depths. Evaluation of the α′-martensite volume fraction in different areas of the treated specimens was the central point in the present study.

SMAT in combination with

Acknowledgements

The support from the National Science Centre, Poland (grant no. DEC-2013/09/B/ST8/00141) is greatly appreciated. This research was supported in part by PLGrid Infrastructure.

References (70)

  • J. Petit et al.

    Multilayer modelling of stainless steel with a nanocrystallised superficial layer

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2012)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Annealing-induced grain refinement in a nanostructured ferritic steel

    J. Mater. Sci. Technol.

    (2012)
  • L. Waltz et al.

    Combination of surface nanocrystallization and co-rolling: creating multilayer nanocrystalline composites

    Scr. Mater.

    (2009)
  • S. Bajda et al.

    Numerical analysis of highly reactive interfaces in processing of nanocrystallised multilayered metallic materials by using duplex technique

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2015)
  • L. Waltz et al.

    Effect of interfacial oxidation occurring during the duplex process combining surface nanocrystallisation and co-rolling

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2011)
  • N. Li et al.

    Effects of surface nanocrystallization on the corrosion behaviors of 316L and alloy 690

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2017)
  • A.Y. Chen et al.

    The influence of strain rate on the microstructure transition of 304 stainless steel

    Acta Mater.

    (2011)
  • J. Talonen et al.

    Formation of shear bands and strain-induced martensite during plastic deformation of metastable austenitic stainless steels

    Acta Mater.

    (2007)
  • W. Hübner

    Phase transformations in austenitic stainless steels during low temperature tribological stressing

    Tribol. Int.

    (2001)
  • H.C. Shin et al.

    Kinetics of deformation induced martensitic transformation in a 304 stainless steel

    Scr. Mater.

    (2001)
  • H.W. Zhang et al.

    Formation of nanostructured surface layer on AISI 304 stainless steel by means of surface mechanical attrition treatment

    Acta Mater.

    (2003)
  • S. Bahl et al.

    Elucidating microstructural evolution and strengthening mechanisms in nanocrystalline surface induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment of stainless steel

    Acta Mater.

    (2017)
  • T. Balusamy et al.

    Plasma nitriding of AISI 304 stainless steel: role of surface mechanical attrition treatment

    Mater. Charact.

    (2013)
  • M.A. Meyers et al.

    Microstructural evolution in adiabatic shear localization in stainless steel

    Acta Mater.

    (2003)
  • T. Balusamy et al.

    Effect of surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) on pack boronizing of AISI 304 stainless steel

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2013)
  • T. Balusamy et al.

    Influence of surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) on the corrosion behaviour of AISI 304 stainless steel

    Corros. Sci.

    (2013)
  • V. Llaneza et al.

    Study of the effects produced by shot peening on the surface of quenched and tempered steels: roughness, residual stresses and work hardening

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • A. Prakash et al.

    The effect of residual stress on fatigue crack growth rate in AISI 304LN stainless steel

    Mater. Today Proc.

    (2017)
  • A. Heydari Astaraee et al.

    Incorporating the principles of shot peening for a better understanding of surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) by simulations and experiments

    Mater. Des.

    (2017)
  • T. Roland et al.

    Fatigue life improvement through surface nanostructuring of stainless steel by means of surface mechanical attrition treatment

    Scr. Mater.

    (2006)
  • A. Baczmanski et al.

    Multi-reflection method and grazing incidence geometry used for stress measurement by X-ray diffraction

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2004)
  • F. Gauzzi et al.

    AISI 304 steel: anomalous evolution of martensitic phase following heat treatments at 400 °C

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2006)
  • B. Bhuvaraghan et al.

    Shot peening simulation using discrete and finite element methods

    Adv. Eng. Softw.

    (2010)
  • T. Chaise et al.

    Modelling of multiple impacts for the prediction of distortions and residual stresses induced by ultrasonic shot peening (USP)

    Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol.

    (2012)
  • S. Lee et al.

    Dynamic failure of metallic pyramidal truss core materials - experiments and modeling

    Int. J. Plast.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Heterostructured stainless steel: Properties, current trends, and future perspectives

      2022, Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are two main mechanisms used for surface nanostructuring: (1) repetitive normal compressive strains at high strain rates, or (2) inducing torsional or shear strain to the surfaces [227]. Examples of the first group of techniques are shot peening processes [29,222,228–234], blasting [224,235–242], SMAT [30,31,244–253,32,254–261,33,49,121,148,220,225,243], surface mechanical rolling treatment (SMRT) [262–264], ultrasonic surface rolling (USR) [62,265,274,266–273], ultrasonic severe surface rolling (USSR) [275], electropulsing-assisted ultrasonic surface rolling process (EP-USRP) [265], ultrasonic nanocrystalline surface modification (UNSM) [137,226,276], ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT) [213], ultrasonic surface mechanical attrition treatment [277], ultrasonic peening (UP) [223,226,229,278], ultrasonic impact peening (UIP) [279], laser-shock peening (LSP) [279], air blast shot peening (ABSP) [226], waterjet peening [280], and the combination of previous techniques with ceramic particles implantation [62,242] or coatings [225]. Among the second group of techniques are torsional deformation [227], pipe inner-surface grinding (PISG) [281,282], SMGT [283,284], and surface spinning strengthening (3 S) [212].

    • Numerical and experimental comparison of two nano-structuring processing techniques on making stronger stainless steels

      2020, Materials Today Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, in the SP-treated samples, even though the grain size also shows decreasing trend from the core to the surface, the size gradient is much smaller than that in the SMAT-treated samples. From the experimental point of view base on grain size distribution, we find that the strengthening mechanism behind SMAT process and SP treatment are quite distinguishing on steels, for example, as to AISI 316 L stainless steels, it is the twinning system down to nano-scale that makes material stronger [23–26]. As for mechanical responses, which works well with the microstructure, the SMAT treated steels behaved much improved capabilities rather than their counterparts subjected to SP.

    • Characterization of nanocrystallised multilayered metallic materials produced by the SMAT followed by constrained compression

      2018, Materials Characterization
      Citation Excerpt :

      The SAED pattern revealed existence of two phases, which confirms that CC processing at 550 °C preserved the α′-martensite phase. Moreover, it was shown in previous work using Rietveld analysis, that the volume fraction of α′-martensite increases significantly after annealing at even higher temperatures [12]. Roland et al. observed similar phenomenon for SMATed 316L stainless steel [50].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text