In situ optical monitoring of the solution concentration influence on supercritical particle precipitation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2010.07.007Get rights and content

Abstract

We report a novel approach for the measurement of the location of particle formation in the supercritical antisolvent process (SAS). The measurement strategy is based on in situ Raman and elastic light scattering. In the SAS process, paracetamol was used as the solute, ethanol as the solvent and carbon dioxide as the antisolvent. Experiments were performed under miscible conditions for the binary system ethanol and carbon dioxide at 313 K and pressures between 10 MPa and 17.5 MPa. For high paracetamol concentrations in the injected ethanol solution, particles were found to start precipitating after jet breakup in a multi-phase flow. For low paracetamol concentrations, precipitation starts later in a one-phase flow, when the transient interface (phase boundary) between the injected solution and the supercritical carbon dioxide has diminished.

Introduction

There is growing interest in the application of supercritical fluid technologies in material design due to various advantages of using supercritical fluids as solvents or antisolvents [1], [2], [3]. Compared to particle formation via conventional routes, supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) facilitates the generation of pure products at mild operation conditions. CO2 is a non-flammable, non-toxic, inexpensive, and environmentally benign substance whose thermodynamic properties can easily be influenced by manipulating the operation conditions around its critical parameters of 304 K and 7.4 MPa [1]. In the downstream process, the solid product can be separated from the solvent and the antisolvent to be recovered by simply reducing the pressure [2].

In 1879, Hannay and Hogarth first discovered that compressed gases can dissolve particular solids [3]. Today, several supercritical fluid technologies for the production of fine and uniform particles are available [4]. Some of them use CO2 as a solvent, but CO2 is also frequently used as an antisolvent to overcome the drawback of the poor solubility of a variety of solids in pressurized CO2. An additional organic solvent is then required to dissolve the solute before it is precipitated due to interaction with the antisolvent CO2. One precipitation technique which applies this principle is the supercritical antisolvent (SAS) process. The solute to be micronized is dissolved in the liquid organic solvent to form a solution. In best case the solute is totally insoluble in the antisolvent/solvent mixture (CO2/organic solvent) [4], [5], [6] while the solvent is completely miscible with the antisolvent. When the solution is injected into the scCO2 mixing induces a high supersaturation of the injected solution and nucleation appears to overcome the metastable mixture.

The SAS precipitation technique has been used for the production of many different materials and a considerable variety of particle morphologies have been observed. The first experiments were used for the production of explosive materials and solid propellants which are difficult to handle using conventional methods [7], [8]. Several researchers have produced polymers [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] or biologically active proteins [14], [15]. The SAS process is most suitable for high-value-added pharmaceutical products because of its mild operation conditions [16]. The mean particle size of the powder produced range from 50 nm up to several microns [17]. Some general reviews on nanomaterials [18], nanoparticle formation [19], microparticle formation [17], [20], nanoparticle synthesis towards biomedical applications [21], nanoparticles synthesis in pharmaceutics and the different ways of delivery [22] and investigations dealing with the specific processes involved in particle formation [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29] can be found in the literature.

Optical measurement techniques have rarely been used for investigating the SAS process. Nevertheless, some very interesting literature on this topic is available. A general introduction into spectroscopy and its potentials for supercritical fluid phases is given by Poliakoff et al. [30]. Some attempts to in vestigate the jet breakup have been made using Shadowgraphy or light scattering techniques [23], [27]. The influence of the dynamic interfacial tension and jet breakup near the critical point was studied by Dukhin et al. [31]. Sun and Shekunov [32] conducted a comparison between equilibrium and dynamic interface tension and found a dynamic interface tension that was twice as large as the equilibrium interface tension and a significantly higher mixture critical pressure (MCP) for the dynamic case. A comprehensive overview on the hydrodynamics of the injected solution, phase equilibria and a comparison with the resulting particles by means of elastic light scattering is given in Reverchon et al. [33]. Measurements and calculations of the characteristic time scales for mass transfer and nucleation at process conditions below the MCP are reported by Chavez et al. [34]. The time for mass transfer is larger than the development of the hydrodynamic instability of the jet. They conclude that just little antisolvent has diffused into the liquid spray by the time the jet breaks up into droplets. Furthermore, they divide the nucleation process into diffusion limited or nucleation limited regime, depending on the desolvation energy, the interfacial tension and the supersaturation.

The objective of our work is to investigate the influence of different solution concentrations and process conditions on the obtained supersaturation and the location of particle precipitation. Time scales for the different processes that take place during particle formation are estimated from the measured data and a comprehensive explanation on mixture formation, jet breakup, phase behaviour and particle nucleation is given. The optical results are compared with particle size distributions from the micronized drug paracetamol. Experiments with the solute paracetamol dissolved in ethanol were conducted at process conditions above the MCP of the binary mixture ethanol and CO2, from pCO2=10MPa up to pCO2=17.5MPa and injection pressures from pS = 20 MPa up to pS = 35 MPa. The main focus of this work is the influence of the concentration of solute in the solution on the particle nucleation process. Paracetamol has been previously used in several investigations, e.g. micronization was studied by Fusaro et al. [35] in a gas antisolvent (GAS) recrystallization technique where they obtained different crystal habits and particle sizes in the range from 50 μm to 250 μm. Bristow et al. [36] and Shekunov et al. [37] produced smaller irregular crystals of paracetamol in the solution enhanced dispersion by supercritical fluids (SEDS) process with particle diameters ranging from 3 μm to 20 μm. Irregular crystals (2 μm) and small elongated crystals (30 μm) were precipitated in the precipitation with compressed antisolvent (PCA) process by Wubbolts et al. [38].

Section snippets

Experimental apparatus, materials and optical setup

The experimental setup comprises a SAS plant for particle precipitation and an optical Raman and Mie scattering setup for the in situ investigation of the particle precipitation process. A sketch of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. The SAS chamber volume for particle production is 350 ml. Pressurization was created using a Sulzer compressor up to the design limit of the precipitation vessel of 20.0 ± 0.1 MPa. To maintain a constant, set temperature, four heating cartridges were integrated

Results and discussion

Previous studies on the system paracetamol, ethanol and CO2 have revealed two important aspects. First, the MCP of this ternary system is significantly above the MCP of the binary system ethanol and CO2 [32], [49]. Therefore the assumption to operate in the one-phase region just by setting the operation pressure above the binary ethanol-CO2 MCP does not hold, as soon as paracetamol is part of the system. Second, the partial density of CO2 indicates whether mixing and precipitation happens in a

Conclusion

The paper presents the influence of different solution concentrations on the process of particle precipitation taking into account the dilution of the phase boundary, the partial density distribution of CO2, and the location of particle formation. We showed that the time scale for nucleation solely depends on the degree of supersaturation of the solution which is affected mainly by the injected solution concentrations. Changes in chamber pressure above the MCP do not have an impact on the

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for parts of this work by the German Research Foundation (DFG) which also funds the Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT) within the framework of the German excellence initiative. Additionally, the authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of the team from the Institute for Process Technology and Machinery (iPAT, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg).

References (65)

  • E. Reverchon et al.

    Spherical microparticles production by supercritical antisolvent precipitation: Interpretation of results

    J. of Supercritical Fluids

    (2008)
  • K. Byrappa et al.

    Nanoparticles synthesis using supercritical fluid technology—towards biomedical applications

    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

    (2008)
  • L.Y. Lee et al.

    Jet breakup and droplet formation in near-critical regime of carbon dioxide-dichloromethane system

    Chemical Engineering Science

    (2008)
  • S.S. Dukhin et al.

    Droplet mass transfer, intradroplet nucleation and submicron particle production in two-phase flow of solvent-supercritical antisolvent emulsion

    Colloids and Surface A

    (2005)
  • E. Badens et al.

    Laminar jet dispersion and jet atomization in pressurized carbon dioxide

    J. of Supercritical Fluids

    (2005)
  • M. Mukhopadhyay et al.

    Mass and heat transfer analysis of SAS: effects of thermodynamic states and flow rates on droplet size

    J. of Supercritical Fluids

    (2004)
  • M. Mukhopadhyay et al.

    Partial molar volume fraction of solvent in binary (CO2–solvent) solution for solid solubility predictions

    J. of Supercritical Fluids

    (2004)
  • S.S. Dukhin et al.

    Dynamic interfacial tension near critical point of a solvent–antisolvent mixture and laminar jet stabilization

    Colloids and Surface A

    (2003)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    Surface tension of ethanol in supercritical CO2

    J. of Supercritical Fluids

    (2003)
  • E. Reverchon et al.

    Interactions of phase equilibria, jet fluid dynamics and mass transfer during supercritical antisolvent micronization

    Chemical Engineering Journal

    (2010)
  • S. Bristow et al.

    Analysis of the supersaturation and precipitation process with supercritical CO2

    J. of Supercritical Fluids

    (2001)
  • B.Y. Shekunov et al.

    Crystallization process in turbulent supercritical flows

    Journal of Crystal Growth

    (1999)
  • F.E. Wubbolts et al.

    Dry-spraying of ascorbic acid or acetaminophen solutions with supercritical carbon dioxide

    Journal of Crystal Growth

    (1999)
  • S. Akimoto et al.

    Solvent-induced shift of the Raman spectra in supercritical fluids

    Chemical Physics Letters

    (1993)
  • R.C. Hanson et al.

    Raman studies of pressure tuning of the fermi resonance in solid CO2

    Chemical Physics Letters

    (1980)
  • S. Dowy et al.

    Laser analyses of mixture formation and the influence of solute on particle precipitation in the SAS process

    J. of Supercritical Fluids

    (2009)
  • S. Dowy et al.

    CO2 partial density distribution during high-pressure mixing with ethanol in the supercritical antisolvent process

    J. of Supercritical Fluids

    (2009)
  • J. Bellan

    Supercritical (and subcritical) fluid behavior and modeling: drops, streams, shear and mixing layers, jets and sprays

    Progress in Energy and Combustion Science

    (2000)
  • G. Nichols et al.

    Physicochemical characterization of the orthorhombic polymorph of paracetamol crystallized from solution

    Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

    (1998)
  • A. Kordikowski et al.

    Volume expansion and vapor-liquid equilibria of binary mixtures of a variety of polar solvents and certain near-critical solvents

    J. of Supercritical Fluids

    (1995)
  • B.E. Poling et al.

    The Properties of Gases and Liquids

    (2001)
  • C.A. Eckert et al.

    Supercritical fluids as solvents for chemical and materials processing

    Nature

    (1996)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Investigation of precipitation selectivity and particle size concentration dependences in supercritical antisolvent method via online supercritical fluid chromatography

      2020, Advanced Powder Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is technically very hard to do, either by sampling a probe from a supercritical solution [21] or via online spectroscopy tools [22,23]. A few approaches to solubility measurement in many-component compressible fluids under high pressure were elaborated specifically within SAS-related research [24–31]. In particular, Braeuer et al. have made a considerable progress in understanding various aspects of SAS process using several in situ analytical techniques, such as laser scattering and Raman spectroscopy [24–29].

    • High Pressure: Fellow and Opponent of Spectroscopic Techniques

      2015, Supercritical Fluid Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore it was not able to reflect the non-thermodynamic influences, such as the flow conditions, or the presence of already precipitated particles and their impact on the mixing behaviour of flows. Therefore, after the ‘cause and effect’ approach, in situ optical measurement techniques, such as shadowgraphy or elastic and inelastic light scattering experiments, were applied to directly visualise the processes taking place inside the SAS-high-pressure-precipitation chamber [31,52–61]. The application of the in situ spectroscopic techniques brought two main insights.

    • Supercritical antisolvent micronization of PVP and ibuprofen sodium towards tailored solid dispersions

      2014, Journal of Supercritical Fluids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Tailored particulate systems can be generated in this process by varying various process parameters. Due to different investigative approaches, whether they are empirical [10–14], simulative [15,16] or optical methods [17–28] a understanding of the basic mechanisms that influence the properties of the final SAS product exists. Nevertheless, a further insight into the single steps of particle generation in the SAS process is still in the focus of recent research.

    • Particle Formation Using Sub- and Supercritical Fluids

      2014, Supercritical Fluid Technology for Energy and Environmental Applications
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text