- •
Various biliary cystic conditions that have been considered together really represent markedly different disorders in terms of embryologic and anatomic considerations, and they also carry different risks of both neoplastic and nonneoplastic complications.
- •
Modern imaging techniques, as well as advances in operative technique and our ability to manage patients in the perioperative period, have likely altered and simplified the necessary classification schemes and treatment algorithms.
Biliary Cysts: A Review and Simplified Classification Scheme
Section snippets
Key points
Classification schemes
Under most circumstances, when one is writing an article such as this, one would begin with a description of the anatomy and physiology of the organs in question. It is a time-honored tradition and usually makes sense. In the case of biliary cysts or congenital choledochal malformations it is probably not so useful, perhaps even counterproductive. By definition, all of the cystic abnormalities either are or derive from anatomic variations. Furthermore, some of the defects may be the direct
Cause
There are a few theories about the cause of choledochal cysts. Agreement on them is far from unanimous. The fact that the anatomic and physiologic aberrations exist more so in some of the subtypes than in others leads to the increased confusion on the topic.
The main theme in most of the theories is one of an altered pressure-compliance situation. Essentially, something happens that makes the biliary structure more distensible, therefore more compliant, and this may or may not be associated with
Risk of malignancy
Irwin and Morrison17 first reported the occurrence of malignancy and stones within a biliary cyst in 1944. Flanigan in 197718 reported a series of patients with biliary carcinomas, in whom slightly more than half had malignancy within the cyst itself (Fig. 8), and the others were distributed throughout the biliary system.18 This finding led many to believe that there is a field defect associated with the presence of biliary cysts. I recommend that this assertion be taken with a large pinch of
Type I cysts
Type I biliary cysts, or extrahepatic biliary cysts, are uncommon but not unheard of in the general population. They are the most common of the biliary cysts. Their incidence is estimated at 1:100,000 to 1:150,000 in Western countries and higher in Japan, at 1:1,000.22 The knowledge of their presence dates back to Vater in 1723.23 Douglas in 185224 suggested the congenital nature of the cyst. The clinical presentation of patients with type I biliary cysts may include abdominal pain, jaundice,
Type II cysts
Type II cysts, or biliary diverticula, are rare. They are so rare that, in my opinion, it would be best to discontinue including them in the discussion of biliary cysts. The differential diagnosis includes duplication of the gallbladder. Intersphincteric diverticula may represent a herniation of bile duct mucosa and, therefore, be false diverticula akin to sigmoid diverticula, whereas the more proximal diverticula are believed to be congenital true diverticula. The only published cholangiograms
Type III cysts
Type III cysts, or choledochoceles, are located within the duodenal wall. The term choledochocele was coined by Wheeler in 1940.36 It is believed to be the second least common of the biliary cysts, although I think that we should reserve judgment on that. The differential diagnosis includes duodenal duplications and other cystic abnormalities of adjacent anatomic structures. Further confusing the topic is that some investigators include cystic abnormalities with duodenal mucosa37 as well as
Type IV cysts
Type IV biliary cysts are classified separately, because multiple cysts are present, at least one of which must be extrahepatic. If the multiple cysts are extrahepatic and intrahepatic, they are considered type IVa cysts, and if the multiple cysts are all extrahepatic, they are considered type IVb cysts. This is probably an unnecessary classification, because it adds little to help us. In the category of the type IVb cysts, everything that can be said about type I cysts also applies without
Type V cysts
Caroli disease is also known as communicating ectasia of the intrahepatic bile ducts. It is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder described by Caroli and others in 1958.41 As mentioned earlier, it is a result of embryologic ductal plate malformations that occur during remodeling. The resultant defect can cause fibrosing and scarring of bile ducts large or small. When the scarring is limited to the smaller duct, the effect may be negligible, but when the scarring involves the larger ducts, the
A simplified approach
I submit to you, dear reader, that from this discussion, we have enough information to generate a simpler approach to biliary cystic disease than is currently used. In no way do I wish to denigrate the work of all those who have toiled before us. After all, it was their work that allowed us to study these disorders and learn what we have. Now, it is time to make use of that effort. I am not the first nor will I likely be the last to suggest an alternative classification scheme, but I provide
Summary
There is much known, and there is much unknown, about biliary cystic disease. Several classification schemes have been developed and modified over the last 70 years or so. What seems to be true is that the various biliary cystic conditions that have been considered together represent markedly different disorders in terms of embryologic and anatomic considerations, and they also carry different risks of both neoplastic and nonneoplastic complications. Modern imaging techniques, as well as
References (42)
- et al.
Biliary cystic disease
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol
(2003) - et al.
Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst
Am J Surg
(1977) - et al.
Experimental analysis of the ill effect of anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union
J Pediatr Surg
(1982) - et al.
Choledochoceles: are they choledochal cysts?
Adv Surg
(2011) - et al.
Choledochal cysts: age of presentation, symptoms, and late complications related to Todani’s classification
J Pediatr Surg
(2002) Congenital choledochal cyst. Analysis of 1,433 patients in the Japanese literature
Am J Surg
(1980)- et al.
Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis and treatment of choledochocele
Gastroenterology
(1984) - et al.
Bile duct cyst type V (Caroli’s disease): surgical strategy and results
HPB (Oxford)
(2007) - et al.
Understanding choledochal malformation
Arch Dis Child
(2012) - et al.
Congenital choledochal cyst, with a report of 2, and an analysis of 94 cases
Int Abstr Surg
(1959)
Bile duct cysts
Surg Clin North Am
Congenital choledochal cysts: new etiological concept based on anomalous relationships of the common bile duct and the pancreatic bulb
Ann Radiol (Paris)
Proteomic analysis of protein plugs: causative agent of symptoms in patients with choledochal cyst
Dig Dis Sci
A clinicopathologic study of choledochal cyst
World J Surg
Choledochal cyst: a concept of etiology
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med
The presence of a positive pressure gradient from pancreatic duct to choledochal cyst demonstrated by duodenoscopic microtransducer manometry: clue to pancreaticobiliary reflux
Endoscopy
Cystic disease of the bile ducts: surgical management and reoperation
Probl Gen Surg
Management dilemmas with choledochal cysts
Arch Surg
Long-term outcome of liver resection and transplantation for Caroli disease and syndrome
Ann Surg
Detection of reovirus RNA in hepatobiliary tissues from patients with extrahepatic biliary atresia and choledochal cysts
Hepatology
Symptomatic choledochoceles in adults. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography recognition and management
Arch Surg
Cited by (20)
Diagnosis and management of choledochal cysts
2023, HPBCitation Excerpt :Given the anatomic location of type III CC (Fig. 5), complete surgical excision of the choledochocele would require a PD or transduodenal excision, which can be technically challenging and associated with morbidity. As such, given the very low incidence of malignant transformation, the accepted management of choledochoceles generally includes an endoscopic approach that may include sphincterotomy or sphinteroplasty.7,34,50–52,11,53 Among patients with choledochoceles, ERCP offers better visualization of ductal anatomy compared with MRCP.54
Choledochal cysts: Management and long-term follow-up
2021, SurgeonCitation Excerpt :However, the fifth cancer development was seen in the setting of a Type II (supraduodenal diverticulum) disease. Malignancy arising from type II and III (intraduodenal choledochocele) cysts are known to be very rare.7,30 Intrahepatic extension of the cyst creates a surgical dilemma.
A giant choledochal cyst: A case reported from Tanzania
2021, International Journal of Surgery Case ReportsCitation Excerpt :Type IVb refers to multiple extrahepatic biliary cysts without intrahepatic involvement. Type V CC, or Caroli disease, appears as an intrahepatic cystic dilatation without evidence of extrahepatic dilatation [14]. Type I CC, along with type IV cysts, have the highest risk of malignancy [12].
Benign biliary diseases
2017, European Journal of RadiologyCitation Excerpt :The characteristic clinical triad consisting of abdominal pain, jaundice and right upper quadrant mass is present only in one third of the patients [67]. Todani’s system is the currently used classification of CC, although new simplified classification schemes more directly relevant with the therapeutic management have recently been reported [68]. Type 1 and Type IV are the most common types occurring respectively in 50–80% and 15–35%.
Anomalies and Anatomic Variants of the Gallbladder and Biliary Tract
2014, Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology: Volumes 1-2, Fourth EditionPATHOLOGICAL STUDIES ON LIVER AND BILE DUCT TUMORS IN SUDANESE CATTLE
2024, Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal (Egypt)