A taxonomy of social embedding - A systematic review of virtual learning simulations in vocational and professional learning

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101098Get rights and content

Abstract

Vocational and professional learning largely occurs in social situations as an interaction between learners and their occupational environment. Due to the increasing digitization of work and learning, virtual learning simulations (VLS) have been on the rise. Yet, it is unclear to which degree VLS can adequately simulate and foster the social dimension of work-related learning. Drawing on different streams of assessment-related authenticity research, we present a five-level taxonomy of social embedding as an evaluative framework: (1) social placement, (2) social action, (3) social reaction, (4) social interaction, (5) collaborative interaction. We then conduct a systematic review and categorize 23 available VLS regarding their degree of social embedding. The results reveal a large variety of social interaction opportunities with a clear focus on social action, social reaction and social interaction. We recommend increasing social immersion in VLS, particularly by combining them with external communication platforms.

Introduction

Digitization’s impact on professional training and vocational education is receiving increasing attention, with digitization playing a twofold role. First, the digitization of occupational activities leads to the automation of routine activities, and the remaining work tasks become more complex. Hence, the respective domain-specific problem-solving skills gain in importance. Second, the digitization of teaching and learning processes can help to meet these changed requirements. There is broad evidence that the importance and necessity of digitization has been recognized by companies, and digitization is already widespread at the individual and strategic level (see also the “skill shift debate”, e.g., Bughin et al., 2018; Lund et al., 2021). It involves replacing routine processes that were previously performed by human workers with new technologies (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014; Frey & Osborne, 2017; Morgeson & Humphrey, 2006). At the same time, the workplace is also becoming increasingly digital through the use of digital technologies in communication, coordination and collaboration.

The changes arising from this digital transformation have not been limited to working processes themselves; they can potentially also dramatically alter learning processes for work. Digital learning environments (DLE) based on learning platforms or on online- and virtual learning are on the rise and open up new opportunities. Particularly, virtual learning simulations (VLS) are seen as highly authentic learning experiences for professional and vocational learners as they imitate real workplaces and offer numerous technical opportunities to learn (Barkley, Major, & Cross, 2014). However, since the development of VLS is time- and work-intensive and also usually domain-specific, it remains to be seen how these new technical possibilities will affect the nature of work-related learning, especially as the degree of digitization varies greatly at individual workplaces. To justify their high development cost, VLS must offer particularly rich learning experiences in the workplace context in order to compete with learning options that are more favorable from a financial perspective.

A defining aspect regarding the quality of vocational and professional learning is its occurrence in social situations in which learning takes place as an interaction between an individual and the occupational environment. In this context, social interaction is important in two ways. Social interaction at the workplace helps satisfy social needs (Lave & Wenger, 1991), which can be considered crucial for well-being as well as for employee engagement and commitment (Cornelissen, 2016). Simultaneously, it supports the development of knowledge and skills. Here, research has emphasized the relevance of learning through social interactions (e.g., Lave & Wenger, 1991; Tynjälä, 2013) as well as the positive impact of social interactions on knowledge and productivity (Cornelissen, 2016). However, it remains unclear to which degree DLE, and in our context VLS as a particular subcategory of DLE, can adequately simulate social dimensions of occupational situations and foster social interaction in vocational and professional learning. Although social and collaborative learning is an ever-growing field of research and practice, there is a particular lack of theoretical frameworks to conceptualize social embeddedness within DLE. Social embedding in this context is understood as the degree to which characteristics of real-world social interactions are simulated during task solving (Gulikers, Bastiaens, & Kirschner, 2004). Although social embedding can be implemented in various ways into VLS, no systematic framework for analyzing approaches to social embedding in VLS is known to the authors.

The goals of this paper are, therefore, (1) to develop a theoretical framework to evaluate social embedding in learning environments i.e., a framework that focuses on interaction with humans or systems during task solving, and (2) to conduct a systematic review to find existing VLS in vocational and professional learning and categorize them according to the framework.

For this purpose, we first outline the theoretical foundations of social interactions, workplace characteristics, learning in authentic environments and classroom interaction. Based on this outline, we describe the development of a taxonomy of social embedding, which is based on the work of Deutscher and Winther (2019) and was adapted and extended for our aim. To make the levels of the taxonomy of social embedding more tangible and to give technical application examples, we then apply it to a newly developed virtual learning simulation (LUCA) and illustrate the degree of learner social embedding within that simulation. Subsequently, the steps of a systematic review are outlined. We then describe the identified VLS, categorize them within the adapted taxonomy and discuss our findings.

Section snippets

Elements of social embedding defined by a five-level taxonomy

To characterize the individual levels of the taxonomy of social embedding, we draw on different streams of research. More precisely, we consider workplace characteristics (Billett, 2001, 2002; Lave & Wenger, 1991) and Goffman’s (1959) definition of social interaction. Moreover, to cover learner embeddedness and immersion, the developed taxonomy draws on different streams of authenticity research (e.g., Deutscher & Winther, 2019; Gulikers et al., 2004). Finally, research on classroom discourses

Evaluating the degree of social embedding in VLS - the example of LUCA

As DLE become increasingly popular, evaluating their quality does not only mean assessing their didactical design. A further important question is the degree to which DLE can adequately support social embedding in the sense that they support social immersion in digital contexts technically. To assess this question, we use the developed theoretical taxonomy to evaluate how social embedding is implemented digitally in the field of vocational and professional learning. We examine this question for

Method

Having outlined the taxonomy of social embedding and an application example, we now describe a systematic review and categorize existing vocational and professional VLS into the taxonomic model. While there are numerous simulations in the vocational and professional field, such as business games, role playing games, case studies, etc., the number of VLS that authentically represent learners’ work environments digitally or virtually is limited. To identify VLS in the field of vocational and

Results

The systematic review and the steps of the literature search, selection and collection yielded 23 studies and 23 VLS in the field of vocational and professional learning. An overview of the included studies and the corresponding VLS can be found in Table 1. The nature of the selected studies is similar as they all refer to DLE using VLS in vocational and professional learning. Because no restrictions were placed regarding specific professions or industries, the overview contains VLS from the

Discussion and conclusion

The aim of the study was to collect and categorize existing vocational and professional VLS that authentically simulate the learners’ workplaces using a computer and/or potentially VR-glasses and with a special focus on the degree of social embedding implemented. Since social embedding can be viewed as a central driver of authenticity, particularly for vocational and professional learning, the question arises to what extent the identified VLS are able to authentically represent the social

Funding

This research study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under Grant No. 21AP008A ‘Problem Solving Analytics in Office Simulations’.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (59)

  • C.B. Frey et al.

    The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    (2017)
  • S. Abele

    Diagnostic problem-solving process in professional contexts: Theory and empirical investigation in the context of car mechatronics using computer-generated log-files

    Vocations and Learning

    (2018)
  • S. Abele et al.

    Berufsfachliche Kompetenzen von Kfz-Mechatronikern – Messverfahren, Kompetenzdimensionen und erzielte Leistungen (KOKO Kfz). [Vocational competencies of car mechatronics – Measurement methods, competence dimensions and achievements]

  • S.L. Baglione et al.

    Higher-order learning and workplace preparation through a computer-based simulation

    International Journal of Business Research and Information Technology

    (2014)
  • E. Barkley et al.

    Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty

    (2014)
  • K.J. Biese et al.

    Using screen-based simulation to improve performance during pediatric resuscitation

    Academic Emergency Medicine

    (2009)
  • S. Billett

    Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement

    The Journal of Workplace Learning

    (2001)
  • S. Billett

    Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation, and engagement

    Adult Education Quarterly

    (2002)
  • E. Brynjolfsson et al.

    The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies

    (2014)
  • J. Bughin et al.

    Skill shift automation and the future of the workforce

    (2018)
  • O. Chernikova et al.

    Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis

    Review of Educational Research

    (2020)
  • D.A. Cook

    How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulations-based education

    Medical Education

    (2014)
  • T. Cornelissen

    Do social interactions in the workplace lead to productivity spillover among co-workers?

    (2016)
  • R.L. Custer et al.

    Using authentic assessment in vocational education. Information Series No. 381

    (2000)
  • S. de Freitas

    Learning in immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning

    (2006)
  • V. Deutscher et al.

    A conceptual framework for authentic competence assessment in VET: A logic design model

  • J.B. Dickinson et al.

    The effect of introducing coaching from an experienced business professional on performance in a computer simulation classroom exercise

    Journal of Instructional Pedagogies

    (2012)
  • P. Dillenbourg

    Introduction: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”?

  • P. Dillenbourg et al.

    The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration

  • O. Döring et al.

    Technologiebasierte Messung von beruflichen Kompetenzen für die Pflege älterer Menschen: berufsfachliche Kompetenzen, allgemeine Kompetenzen und Kontextfaktoren (TEMA). [Technology-based measurement of professional competencies for elder care: Professional competencies, generic competencies, and contextual factors].

  • D. Edwards et al.

    Common knowledge. The development of understanding in the classroom

    (1987)
  • G. Egonsdotter et al.

    Child protection and cultural awareness. Simulation-based learning

    Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work

    (2020)
  • M. Eraut

    Informal learning in the workplace

    Studies in Continuing Education

    (2004)
  • E. Goffman

    The presentation of self in everyday life

    (1959)
  • J.T. Gulikers et al.

    A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment

    Educational Technology Research and Development

    (2004)
  • J.T. Gulikers et al.

    Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: Student and teacher perceptions of assessment authenticity

    Journal of Vocational Education and Training

    (2008)
  • F. Hesse et al.

    A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills

  • H. Jossberger et al.

    Learning in workplace simulations in vocational education: A student perspective

    Vocations and Learning

    (2018)
  • D. Kaufman et al.

    Enhancing teacher education with simulations

    TechTrends

    (2016)
  • Cited by (5)

    View full text