Evaluation of the Heliosat-II method using daily irradiation data for four stations in Iran
Introduction
The estimation of fluxes of incident shortwave radiation at the earth’s surface is important for a number of applications including climate monitoring, regional solar energy availability assessment for heating and electrical power generation purposes and for the evaluation of the cloud and radiation parameterization used in weather and climate models (Diak et al., 1996).
The availability of solar radiation data is limited by the sparsity of the existing networks. Zelenka et al. (1999) and Perez et al. (1997) state that estimating solar radiation data from satellite images is more accurate than interpolating data measured by a modern radiometric network. In daily basis, the error resulted from estimating incoming solar radiation by use of satellite images is equal to the error related to interpolating measured data in a radiometric network with 50 km distance between stations (Fig. 1). The error of interpolation increases with the distance between stations; for a radiometric network such as the one existing in Iran with average distance more than 500 km this error gets larger than 50%. In addition, the quality of the insolation fields produced from this network relies on the goodness of calibration, regular maintenance and the persistence of the functioning of all instruments. These requisites are not always met over the entire network.
On the other hand, there exist several methods for determining solar radiation at ground level from images of geostationary satellites. Furthermore, as reported by Rigollier and Wald (1998), the estimates made from satellite data always offer relatively equal quality within the observed area. It has been shown that the accuracy of the estimates does not depend on the geographical area, except for highly variable mountainous areas. In these complex mountainous areas, the quality of the results depends strongly on the spatial resolution of the satellite data: the better the resolution, the more accurate the estimates (Zelenka, 1994).
Models capable of exploiting satellite observations to generate irradiances range from physically vigorous to purely empirical. At one end, physical models (e.g. Raschke and Preuss, 1979, Gautier et al., 1980, Schillings et al., 2004a, Schillings et al., 2004b) attempt to explain the observed earth radiances (the brightness seen by the satellite) by solving radiation transfer equations which requires absolute satellite calibration knowledge and precise information on the composition of the atmosphere. At the other end, empirical/statistical models (Trapely, 1979, Cano et al., 1986, Fontoynont et al., 1998) may consist of a simple regression between satellite counts and corresponding measurements at the earth’s surface. Hybrid models (Rigollier et al., 2004) use a simple physical modeling approach and some degree of fitting to observations (Perez et al., 2002).
The first attempts to estimate solar radiation from satellite images are found in the works of US Department of Commerce (Hanson, 1971), Vonder Haar, 1973, Vonder Haar and Ellis, 1975, Vonder Haar and Ellis, 1978, Trapely, 1979 and Moser and Raschke (1983). The basic procedure of the Heliosat method was developed by Cano (1982) and Cano et al. (1986), and partly modified by several researchers (Diabate et al., 1988, Diabate et al., 1989, Moussu et al., 1989, Beyer et al., 1996, Hammer et al., 1997, Fontoynont et al., 1998, Rigollier and Wald, 1998; Rigollier et al., 2004). This method was developed to derive solar irradiance maps from Meteosat images. The basic idea of the Heliosat method is that the amount of global solar radiation over an area is statistically related to the cloud cover. The method relies on the prior determination of a reference albedo map and is statistical in nature and avoids the problem of satellite data calibration. In addition to the albedo, the final results are computed according to the linear relationship between the hourly transmission factor measured at the ground and the cloud cover index computed from the Meteosat data.
Diabate et al. (1989) have used the Heliosat version developed by Diabate et al. (1988) and Moussu et al. (1989) for on-line mapping of global solar radiation from the satellite data directly received at ground by a HF receiver. They used three hourly images to compute daily mean map of solar radiation. Rigollier and Wald (1998) improved the Heliosat method to produce a climatological database of solar radiation over Europe, Africa, and Atlantic Ocean based on the satellite observations.
Rigollier et al. (2004) introduced a new version of the Heliosat method entitled “Heliosat-II”. This new version integrates the knowledge gained by various exploitations of the original Heliosat method and its variants in a coherent and thorough way. It is based on the same physical principles but the input to the method, instead of the digital output from the sensor, is the calibrated radiances. This takes into account the changes of the sensor and removes the need for empirically defined parameters and pyranometric measurements to tune them. Fore more information about the calibration of the Meteosat images refer to Lefevre et al., 2000, Rigollier et al., 2002, Govaerts et al., 2004, EUMETSAT, 2005a, EUMETSAT, 2005b. In the new version of the Heliosat method, the assessment of the ground albedo and the cloud albedo is based on the explicit formulations of the path radiance and the transmittance of the atmosphere. For daily values, RMSDs computed from the measured data of 35 European stations were 20%, 16% and 10% for January, April and July, respectively. They noted that, the use of a block of 3 by 3 pixels would lead to a decrease of the standard deviation by 3, thus decreasing the above RMSDs to 8%, 7% and 4%, respectively. As shown in Table 1, the error of the Heliosat method is far less than the other methods.
All these studies confirm the credibility of the Heliosat-II method for estimating the solar irradiation from satellite images. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the Heliosat-II method by using the measured irradiation data of four Iranian radiometric stations and the high resolution visible images of Meteosat-5 located over 63°E and equator.
Section snippets
Satellite and irradiation data
In order to evaluate the results of the Heliosat method, daily global solar irradiation measured by CM7B pyranometers, manufactured by Kipp and Zonen, for four stations of Iranian Meteorological Organization (IRIMO) were used. The stations were selected from 25 IRIMO stations and 5 stations of the Renewable Energy Organization of Iran. The quality control (QC) method developed by Moradi and Kamali (2005) and modified by Moradi (2008) was used to control the quality of the data. This method uses
Estimation of solar irradiation
The solar irradiation was estimated through the use of Heliosat-II method. The development, evaluation and applications of the Heliosat-II method are described elsewhere (Cano et al., 1986, Diabate et al., 1988, Diabate et al., 1989, Zelenka, et al., 1992, and Rigollier et al., 2004) and here we only give a short description of the procedure used in this study. The schematic view of the procedure is shown in Fig. 2 and is described as following:
- 1.
The ground albedo maps are developed for each
Results
The results of the study are presented in Table 3. The valid days included in the study are large enough for obtaining the significant results; except in the autumn of Yazd where due to shut down of the station only 6 days were retained. In the other stations, rejected days were omitted due to either irradiation data did not pass QC or satellite images were missing. According to this table the RMSD and MBD are 0.7 and 0.1 kWh m−2 for the whole data set, respectively. The annual RMSD% and MBD%
Conclusions
Heliosat-II method developed by Rigollier et al. (2004) was evaluated for Iran by Meteosat-5 images and measured data of four IRIMO stations during the year 2004. The overall RMSD and MBD for whole daily dataset were only 11.7% and 1.6%, respectively. The results clearly show that the Meteosat data can be used for mapping global solar irradiation over Iran with a ground resolution of ∼3 × 3 km. This accuracy is a great achievement for a country such as Iran with very sparse radiometric network and
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Drs. Wald and Rigollier (France), Govaerts (EUMETSAT), Perez, Gueymard and Zelenka (USA), Scheifinger (Vienna) and Jan Remund (Switzerland, especially for providing Linke turbidity data) for their helpful comments and discussions during execution of the project. We would also like to give our sincere thanks to anonymous referees for carefully reading the manuscript and giving a number of useful suggestions for improvement. All Meteosat data were kindly provided by EUMETSAT
References (40)
- et al.
Modifications of the Heliosat procedure for irradiance estimates from satellite images
Sol. Energy
(1996) - et al.
A method for the determination of the global solar radiation from meteorological satellite data
Sol. Energy
(1986) - et al.
Description of an operational tool for determining global solar radiation at ground using geostationary satellite images
Sol. Energy
(1989) - et al.
A note on first estimates of surface insolation from GOES-8 visible satellite data
Agr. Forest Meteorol.
(1996) - et al.
A web service for controlling the quality of measurements of global solar radiation
Sol. Energy
(2002) - et al.
Rethinking satellite based solar irradiance modelling. The solis clear-sky module
Remote Sens. Environ.
(2004) - et al.
A new operational model for satellite-derived irradiances: description and validation
Sol. Energy
(2002) - et al.
Comparing satellite remote sensing and ground network measurements for the production of site/time specific irradiance data
Sol. Energy
(1997) - et al.
On the clear sky model of the 4th European solar radiation atlas with respect to the Heliosat method
Sol. Energy
(2000) - et al.
The method Heliosat-2 for deriving shortwave solar radiation from satellite images
Sol. Energy
(2004)
Operational method for deriving high resolution direct normal irradiance from satellite data
Sol. Energy
Estimating incident solar radiation at the surface from images of the earth transmitted by geostationary satellites: the Heliosat project
Int. J. Remote Sens.
A simple physical model to estimate incident solar radiation at the surface from GOES satellite data
J. Appl. Meteorol.
Operational calibration of the Meteosat radiometer VIS band
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote
Cited by (38)
Producing high-quality solar resource maps by integrating high- and low-accuracy measurements using Gaussian processes
2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Initially, large-scale assessments and resource mapping have been conducted where research and development of pioneering solar applications were actively being developed, such as over western Europe [1], the Americas [2,3], or Australia [4]. Recently, such need has spawned a large body of literature on country-scale or regional solar resource assessment studies aimed at areas where local resource data were critically needed to help initiate or expand the local solar industry, e.g., in Chile [5], Mexico [6], Libya [7], Mali [8], Nigeria [9], Pakistan [10], Iran [11], Qatar [12], Saudi Arabia [13], or the United Arab Emirates [14,15]. Irradiance resource maps produced from annual or monthly data are typically found in such solar resource studies, because they provide a direct visual summary to all stakeholders who wish to understand the geographical distribution of the solar potential, and because the mean annual irradiation is the most important information needed to characterize the solar resource.
Assessment of solar energy potential over the United Arab Emirates using remote sensing and weather forecast data
2016, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsSatellite-based assessment and in situ validation of solar irradiation maps in the Republic of Djibouti
2015, Solar EnergyCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, the comparison achieved by the same authors between Heliosat-2 estimates and ground measurements from 35 stations in Europe has given the following results: a daily (respectively hourly) RRMSE equal to 10% (18%) in July and equal to 20% (45%) in January, and a daily (respectively hourly) correlation coefficient between 0.94 and 0.95 (0.83 and 0.9). An other Heliosat-2 study realized in a similar climate has also been achieved in Iran by Moradi et al. (2009). Daily comparison with the Yazd’s arid climate has shown a relative error of 9.9% and a determination coefficient of 0.905.