Review articleViolence against children in humanitarian settings: A literature review of population-based approaches
Introduction
Violence against children represents a global public health crisis. It is well documented that violence against children not only impairs individuals' physical, emotional, and social development, but also has important economic and social consequences for nations as a whole (Felitti et al., 1998, Pinheiro, 2006, Krug et al., 2002). Children in humanitarian settings are presumed to face an increased risk of exposure to violence. Humanitarian emergencies can be brought about by armed conflict, natural disasters or political unrest, and can span the scope of days, months and even years, depending on particular contextual factors (The Sphere Project, 2011). The Sphere Project defines a humanitarian “disaster” as:
“… a serious disruption of the functioning of a community or a society involving widespread human, material, economic or environmental losses and impacts that exceeds the ability of the affected community or society to cope using its own resources and therefore requires urgent action …” (The Sphere Project, 2012, p. 4).
The term thus covers natural and man-made disasters and conflicts and encompasses related terms such as ‘crisis’ and ‘emergency’. Such events disrupt social structures typically in place to protect children, and create circumstances within which multiple forms of harm and abuse can occur (Apfel and Simon, 1996, Boothby et al., 2006, Machel, 2001, Montgomery and Foldspang, 2005).
While awareness of these risks is widespread, efforts to monitor prevalence or trends of violence against children in emergencies are challenging. Large numbers of cases go unreported due to social stigma, lack of appropriate reporting mechanisms, and the fact that violence is often perpetrated by parents, relatives, or close acquaintances, making it particularly difficult for children to come forward (Pinheiro, 2006, Stark, 2010, Stark et al., 2013).
Recently, there has been increased recognition that population-based surveys have an important role to play in understanding child maltreatment (Hovdestad et al., 2015, Reza et al., 2009). Such surveys have the potential to isolate drivers of violence, identify protective factors and allow for the study of health-relevant outcomes that may be undocumented in medical and social services databases. In addition, such studies may provide important insights for developing and testing theories of change that can prevent childhood violence. Yet, such surveys are far from standard practice in emergency settings.
The current lack of evidence on the scope and magnitude of violence against children in these settings interferes with the ability of humanitarian practitioners to ensure that children in need receive appropriate targeted care, or that sufficient resources for effective interventions are put in place. This paper analyzes existing attempts to measure violence against children in humanitarian settings, representing a first step towards the development of research methodologies to more accurately measure, prevent, and respond to violence against children, and to promote the healthy development of children in humanitarian emergencies.
Section snippets
Methodology
A rigorous review of peer-reviewed literature was undertaken in accordance with the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines (Stroup et al., 2000), focusing on the measurement of violence against children in humanitarian contexts. The purpose of this review was to investigate existing prevalence data pertaining to violence against children in humanitarian settings and to examine methodologies that have been used to measure these issues. A Boolean search
Results
The initial search produced 2634 articles, of which 2554 were removed after a review of title and abstracts. Eighty articles were selected for full review, of which 58 were excluded. The remaining 22 studies were determined to meet full inclusion criteria and were further analyzed. This process is depicted in Fig. 1.
What do we know and what gaps remain?
Although the review allowed for inclusion of publications between 1995 and 2014, more than half (13 out of 22 papers) have been published during the past five years (2009–2014), suggesting that efforts to measure the prevalence of violence against children in humanitarian settings are relatively recent. In addition, the small number of studies that met final inclusion criteria suggests a limited evidence base by which to determine trends of violence against children in humanitarian contexts.
Conclusion
Findings from our review reveal a weak evidence base by which to determine the scale, nature and impact of violence against children in emergency settings. Without reliable data, humanitarian actors are limited in their ability to design effective prevention and response initiatives to address the forms of violence experienced by children, and to ensure that sufficient resources for needed programming are put in place. Humanitarian efforts around the world are to be lauded, but if they apply a
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support and guidance of the Child Protection Working Group, especially Katherine Williamson. Finally, the authors acknowledge the financial support of United States Agency for International Development's Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance. Statements made in this paper are the views of the authors alone, and do not constitute the policy of the above listed funding bodies. CUMC IRB exemption reference: AAAB7134.
References (67)
- et al.
How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment: a review of the literature and alternative pathways
Child Abuse Negl.
(2007) - et al.
Initimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study
Lancet
(2008) - et al.
Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study
Am. J. Prev. Med.
(1998) - et al.
Predicting abuse-prone parental attitudes and discipline practices in a nationally representative sample
Child Abuse Negl.
(1999) - et al.
Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
(2006) - et al.
Effects of war trauma on Cambodian refugee adolescents' functional health and mental health status
J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry
(1997) Conflict, violence, and health: setting a new interdisciplinary agenda
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2010)- et al.
Violence, suffering and mental health in Afghanistan: aA school-based survey
Lancet
(2009) - et al.
Mental health and childhood adversities: a longitudinal study in Kabul, Afghanistan
J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry
(2011) Political violence, ethnic conflict, and contemporary wars: broad implications for health and social well-being
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2002)