ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Social Science & Medicine
Volume 63, Issue 10, November 2006, Pages 2617-2627
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (147 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.005    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

How far can complementary and alternative medicine go? The case of chiropractic and homeopathy

Merrijoy KelnerCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Beverly Wellmana, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Sandy Welsha, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Heather Boona, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aInstitute for Human Development Toronto, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada, M5T 3J1

Available online 22 August 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This paper examines the efforts of two complementary and alternative occupations, chiropractors and homeopaths, to move from the margins to the mainstream in health care in the province of Ontario. We use a variety of theoretical perspectives to understand how health occupations professionalize: the trait functionalist framework, social closure, the system of professions, and the concept of countervailing powers. The research traces the strategies that the leaders of the two groups are employing, as well as the resources they are able to marshal. These are analyzed within the context of the larger institutional and cultural environment. The data are derived from in-person interviews with 16 leaders (10 chiropractic and 6 homeopathic) identified through professional associations, teaching institutions and informants from the groups. The responses were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. We also used archival materials to document what the leaders were telling us. The data revealed four main strategies: (1) improving the quality of educational programs, (2) elevating standards of practice, (3) developing more peer reviewed research, and (4) increasing group cohesion. Although both groups identified similar strategies, the chiropractors were bolstered by more resources as well as state sanctioned regulation. The efforts of the homeopaths were constrained by scarce resources and the absence of self-regulation. In both cases the lack of strong structural support from government and the established health professions played an important role in limiting what was possible. In the future, it may be to the state's advantage to modify the overall shape of health care to include alternative paradigms of healing along with conventional medical care. Such a shift would put complementary and alternative medicine occupations in a better position to advance professionally and become formal elements of the established health care system.

Keywords: Canada; Complementary/alternative; Chiropractic; Homeopathy; Professionalisation

Article Outline

Introduction
Becoming a profession
Methods
Background description: Chiropractors and homeopaths
Findings
Strategies
Improving the quality of educational programs
Elevating standards of practice
Developing research capacity
Increasing group cohesion
Resources
Resources for improving the quality of education
Resources for elevating standards of practice
Resources for developing research capacity
Resources for increasing group cohesion
Discussion
The nature of professions
Fitting into the system
Acknowledgements
References

Social Science & Medicine
Volume 63, Issue 10, November 2006, Pages 2617-2627
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.