Proving the principle: Taking geodesic dynamics too seriously in Einstein's theory☆
Section snippets
Geodesic dynamics
Einstein's adoption of the geodesic principle was originally thought to be an independent postulate establishing the dynamics of the theory. Not long after the debut of his general theory, however, numerous special-case results and plausibility arguments were developed suggesting that in fact the principle was not logically independent (given certain assumptions about free-fall bodies) from Einstein's field equations themselves.1
Singularity proofs
The family of proofs which I will refer to as singularity proofs really consist of two distinct subclasses. The first subclass follows Einstein and Grommer's original “third way” method in which they attempt to use true singularities in the manifold in order to represent matter–energy. These singularities in the manifold are then (somehow) supposed to be shown to be geodetic. With the mathematical advances in distribution theory, these true singularity proofs were succeeded by the second
Zeroth-order proofs
Einstein's field equations have an initial value formulation. Under suitable conditions, this problem can be well posed so that we might use the field equations to deduce how a given tensor field defined on a particular hypersurface evolves over time (viz. the domain of dependence of that hypersurface). Though this works in principle, such a program is far more easily said than done in most cases and often numerically rather than analytically. As a consequence if physicists wished to predict,
Limit operation proofs
The strategy behind the final family of limit operation proofs is to avoid the complications arising from investigating the motion of “true” point particles with extent restricted precisely to one-dimensional timelike curves by instead considering sequences of energy–momentum representations of particles whose spacelike extent is confined to increasingly smaller neighborhoods of those curves. We can think of these infinite sequences of tensor fields as representing particles with arbitrarily
Conclusion: towards a geodesic universality thesis
In this paper I have argued that the canonical view that the geodesic principle provides the dynamics of general relativity theory fails. Under this interpretation, the commonly endorsed belief that the principle can be derived either from Einstein's original field equations or a distributional generalization of them must be rejected (even if we allow for further background assumptions about the kind of matter–energy that is supposed to follow such geodesics). By reviewing the three major
References (92)
Critical phenomena and breaking drops: Infinite idealizations in physics
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
(2005)- et al.
Dynamics of continua and particles from general covariance of newtonian gravitation theory
Reports on Mathematical Physics
(1978) - et al.
Einstein and singularities
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
(1999) - et al.
Equation of motion of small bodies in relativity
Annals of Physics
(2004) - et al.
A global theory of algebras of generalized functions I
Advances in Mathematics
(2002) The interaction of spin and torsion. II. The principle of general covariance
Annals of Physics
(1985)The Devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence
(2002)Hydrodynamics versus molecular dynamics: Intertheory relations in condensed matter physics
Philosophy of Science
(2006)Idealization and modeling
Synthese
(2009)Le Principe de Relativité et la Théorie de la Gravitation
(1922)
Introduction to the theory of relativity
Physical relativity: Space-time structure from a dynamical perspective
Less is different: Emergence and reduction reconciled
Foundations of Physics
A new basis for cosmology
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
A covariant multipole formalism for extended test bodies in general relativity
Il Nuovo Cimento (1955–1965)
Description of extended bodies by multipole moments in special relativity
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity. I. Momentum and angular momentum
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity. II. Moments of the charge-current vector
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
The definition of multipole moments for extended bodies
General Relativity and Gravitation
Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity. III. Equations of motion
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
On the uniqueness of the Newtonian theory as a geometric theory of gravitation
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Minimal gravitational coupling in the Newtonian theory and the covariant Schrödinger equation
General Relativity and Gravitation
Bangs, crunches, whimpers, and shrieks: Singularities and acausalities in relativistic spacetimes
The mathematical theory of relativity
Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity center-of-mass description and quasirigidity
General Relativity and Gravitation
Entwurf einer Verallgemeinerten Relativitatstheorie und eine Theorie der Gravitation, I. Physikalischer Teil von A. Einstein, II. Mathematischer Teil von M. Grossmann
Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik
The foundation of the general theory of relativity
The meaning of relativity
Ideas and opinions
Allgemeine relativitatstheorie und bewegungsgesetz
The gravitational equations and the problem of motion II
Annals of Mathematics
On the motion of particles in general relativity theory
Canadian Journal of Mathematics
The gravitational equations and the problem of motion I
Annals of Mathematics
The particle problem in the general theory of relativity
Physical Review
Dynamical trajectories and geodesics
Annals of Mathematics
Inconsistency, asymmetry, and non-locality: A philosophical investigation of classical electrodynamics
Metrics with distributional curvature
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Motion of a body in general relativity
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Singular boundaries of space-times
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Strings and other distributional sources in general relativity
Physical Review D
Self-organized criticality of belief propagation in large heterogeneous teams
Dynamics of Information Systems
An analysis and design methodology for belief sharing in large groups
A rigorous derivation of gravitational self-force
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Geometric theory of generalized functions with applications to general relativity
On the equations of motion of a classical particle in a Yang–Mills field and the principle of general covariance
Hadronic Journal
Cited by (23)
Non-empirical robustness arguments in quantum gravity
2020, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern PhysicsUnweyling Three Mysteries of Nordström Gravity
2020, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern PhysicsConservation, inertia, and spacetime geometry
2019, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern PhysicsNewtonian Equivalence Principles
2023, Erkenntnis
- ☆
In the following, will be taken to be a smooth, orientable, four-dimensional manifold, and will be referred to as a Lorentzian spacetime if gab is a smooth metric of signature defined on . Excepting quoted material all further notational conventions follow that of Wald (1984).