Tissue Microarrays in Clinical Oncology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.10.006Get rights and content

Tissue microarray (TMA) is a recently implemented, high-throughput technology for the analysis of molecular markers in oncology. This research tool permits the rapid assessment of a biomarker in thousands of tumor samples, using commonly available laboratory assays such as immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Although introduced less than a decade ago, TMA has proven to be invaluable in the study of tumor biology, the development of diagnostic tests, and the investigation of oncologic biomarkers. This review describes the impact of TMA-based research in clinical oncology and its potential future applications. Technical aspects of TMA construction and the advantages and disadvantages inherent to this technology are also discussed.

Section snippets

TMA Construction and Analysis

The initial identification and collection of tumor samples represents the greatest portion of the work associated with TMA construction. Samples need to be identified based on their availability in sufficient numbers to address the proposed scientific or clinical question. For example, prognostic studies will require a large number of cases with long-term outcome data to provide adequate statistical power. Similarly, a study investigating a novel diagnostic biomarker may require the

Advantages of TMAs

The staining of a few TMA sections in comparison to many more whole sections offers a clear benefit with respect to the use of laboratory reagents and technician time. Because several research groups are now using TMAs representing in excess of 1,000 tumors, this approach represents a major savings in scientific resources. In addition, there is also the benefit of decreased technical variability during the staining and interpretation process. The close proximity of cores also permits more rapid

TMAs in the Study of Tumor Biology

TMAs permit the rapid assessment of individual molecular markers on large patient cohorts. This approach complements molecular screening and discovery studies by confirming results on large numbers of primary tumor cases. TMAs have been so used in the initial articles characterizing new breast cancer oncogenes such as EMSY3 and alpha-basic crystallin4 and the recently identified prostate cancer fusion oncogene TMPRSS2:ERG.5

TMAs are similarly useful in characterizing the immunohistochemical

TMAs for the Assessment of New Diagnostic Tools

In modern oncology, treatment decisions are critically dependent on accurate diagnostic pathology. Increasingly, molecular biomarkers are used in conjunction with conventional histology to improve diagnostic accuracy. Examples include the use of cytokeratin stain to localize micrometastases in sentinel lymph node biopsies for breast cancer and the use of antibody panels to ascertain a tissue diagnosis for a metastasis of unknown primary origin. Primary unknown malignancies are particularly

TMAs for the Assessment of Prognostic and Predictive Values

In the clinical practice of oncology, therapeutic decisions regarding adjuvant treatment are often based on a clinician’s estimate of recurrence risk and the expected therapeutic gain from a specific treatment. More recently, clinicians have at their disposal prognostic models that are based on the retrospective analysis of large outcome databases. Examples include the Kattan nomograms for prostate cancer,21 and the Web-based prediction tool “Adjuvant! Online” for breast and colorectal

TMAs in Quality Control and Clinical Practice

Although TMA studies are an important tool for the validation of novel biomarkers, most molecular epidemiology studies are derived from a single institution, and even if the tumor samples are collected from multiple sites, sample processing and data collection and analysis are performed centrally. There are multiple reports in the medical literature of conflicting results on the prognostic or predictive value of a novel biomarker. One example is cyclin E in breast cancer, for which 1 research

Validation of TMA Analysis

The most frequent criticism of TMA technology relates to the small size of each tissue core; there is concern that because of tumor heterogeneity, biomarker scores obtained from small TMA cores will not accurately reflect scores obtained from whole sections.43, 51, 52 However, it should be noted that although whole-section analysis is a “gold standard” for in situ tests, whole sections themselves represent just a small portion of a tumor, and, indeed core needle, punch, and bite biopsies used

Conclusion and Future Directions

The most important step in initiating a TMA study is the identification of appropriate patient cohorts with accessible archival tissue materials. Prognostic studies require patient data that are thorough and complete and include long-term follow-up. Diagnostic studies may require locating source blocks from multiple tumor types and tissues in various stages of malignant progression.

In laboratory medicine, TMAs already play an important role in quality assurance and the characterization of new

References (57)

  • R. Simon et al.

    Tissue microarrays for miniaturized high-throughput molecular profiling of tumors

    Exp Hematol

    (2002)
  • J. Torhorst et al.

    Tissue microarrays for rapid linking of molecular changes to clinical endpoints

    Am J Pathol

    (2001)
  • A. Hoos et al.

    Tissue microarray profiling of cancer specimens and cell lines: Opportunities and limitations

    Lab Invest

    (2001)
  • M. Mirlacher et al.

    Influence of slide aging on results of translational research studies using immunohistochemistry

    Mod Pathol

    (2004)
  • J. Kononen et al.

    Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens

    Nat Med

    (1998)
  • J.V. Moyano et al.

    AlphaB-crystallin is a novel oncoprotein that predicts poor clinical outcome in breast cancer

    J Clin Invest

    (2006)
  • S.A. Tomlins et al.

    Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer

    Science

    (2005)
  • H. Eerola et al.

    Histopathological features of breast tumours in BRCA1BRCA2 and mutation-negative breast cancer families

    Breast Cancer Res

    (2005)
  • J. Palacios et al.

    Phenotypic characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors based in a tissue microarray study with 37 immunohistochemical markers

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (2005)
  • J.L. Boddy et al.

    The androgen receptor is significantly associated with vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia sensing via hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1aHIF-2a, and the prolyl hydroxylases in human prostate cancer

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2005)
  • E.T. Hawk et al.

    Colorectal cancer prevention

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • K. Kerlikowske et al.

    Efficacy of screening mammographyA meta-analysis

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • J.M. Stewart et al.

    Comparison of annexin II, p63 and AMACR immunoreactivity in prostatic tissue: A tissue microarray study

    J Clin Pathol

    (2007)
  • P. Mhawech-Fauceglia et al.

    FLI-1 Expression in 4323 malignant and benign tumours: A multiple tumour tissue microarray analysis using polyclonal antibody

    J Clin Pathol

    (2007)
  • N. Kambham et al.

    Utility of syndecan-1 (CD138) expression in the diagnosis of undifferentiated malignant neoplasms: A tissue microarray study of 1,754 cases

    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol

    (2005)
  • S.R. Owens et al.

    Immunohistochemical staining for p63 is useful in the diagnosis of anal squamous cell carcinomas

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (2007)
  • N.H. Au et al.

    P63 expression in lung carcinoma: A tissue microarray study of 408 cases

    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol

    (2004)
  • J. Terry et al.

    TLE1 as a diagnostic immunohistochemical marker for synovial sarcoma emerging from gene expression profiling studies

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (2007)
  • Cited by (102)

    • Reliable Gene Expression Profiling from Small and Hematoxylin and Eosin–Stained Clinical Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Specimens Using the HTG EdgeSeq Platform

      2019, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has been shown herein that the EdgeSeq platform (HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.) can generate reliable expression data from as little as 1 mm2 FFPE tissue and crude FFPE tissue lysates equivalent to surface areas as low as 0.31 mm2 of a section (5 μm thick). This is approximately half the size of a small tissue microarray core,62 and hundreds or even thousands of times smaller than that used for analysis by alternative methods.49,59–61 Thus, the requirement for tissue with an equivalent surface area of at least 0.31 mm2 does not represent a significant limitation of this method.

    • MRE11 as a Predictive Biomarker of Outcome After Radiation Therapy in Bladder Cancer

      2019, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    • A survival guide to HER2 testing in gastric/gastroesophageal junction carcinoma

      2019, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Concordance of HER2 status between adequate biopsy samples and resection is good if adequate tumor fragments are included in the biopsy sample.23,26 A tissue microarray is an alternative to reduce the cost of antibodies in research setting, although they are not suitable for clinical testing.35 The main drawback of using tissue microarray is difficulty in avoiding false-negative results because of heterogeneity in HER2 amplification and protein expression.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    David Voduc and Torsten O. Nielsen are supported by the National Institutes of Health Strategic Partnering to Evaluate Cancer Signatures program. Torsten O. Nielsen is a scholar of the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. The Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from sanofi-aventis.

    View full text