A possible tsunami deposit around the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary in the Boulonnais area (northern France)
Introduction
Instantaneous and/or exceptional events (e.g. meteorite impacts, earthquakes, tsunamis) greatly disturb sedimentary environments. Among such instantaneous events, tsunamis are a constant feature of the present world oceans. In the 1990s, for example, 83 tsunamis events occurred, mostly triggered by earthquakes. An average rate of 57 events per decade is globally recorded in historical times (Bryant, 2001). Many of these events had major effects on the coastlines and some caused great damage. Other mechanisms involved in generating tsunamis are submarine landslides, volcanic eruptions and impacts of bolides into the oceans.
Anomalous deposits attributed to tsunamis (tsunamites) have recently been described from a variety of ages and environmental settings, e.g. upper Archean (Hassler et al., 2000), lower Proterozoic (Bhattacharya and Bandyopadhyay, 1998), Cambrian (Pratt, 2002), mid-Cretaceous (Rossetti et al., 2000), the K/T boundary interval (e.g. Bourgeois et al., 1988, Takayama et al., 2000), Miocene (Shiki and Yamazaki, 1996), middle Pliocene (Massari and D'Allessandro, 2000), upper Pleistocene (Takashimizu and Masuda, 2000), and Holocene (e.g. Hemphill-Haley, 1996, Goff et al., 1998, Cita and Aloisi, 2000, Dawson and Shi, 2000, Dominey-Howes et al., 2000, Nanayama et al., 2000, Bondevik et al., 2003, Tuttle et al., 2004). Tsunamites range from deep-sea and abyssal plain settings (Cita and Aloisi, 2000) to marine coastal (Bhattacharya and Bandyopadhyay, 1998) and coastal lake settings (Dawson and Shi, 2000).
Although there is no reason to believe that tsunamis had a very different frequency in the past, whatever the age considered, and despite the above-mentioned recent studies, only few examples of ancient tsunamites are described in the literature when considering all the coastal sequences studied. Such events are in most cases not recognized, and their occurrence is therefore largely underevaluated in the geological literature, probably especially for pre-Quaternary times. This under-appreciation of the role of tsunamis in ancient coastal successions boils down two reasons. The first reason is that non-deltaic coastal environments are characterized by erosion as much as deposition, and therefore are not abundantly represented in the stratigraphic record. The second reason is that it is not clear how to separate the deposits of major storms and hurricanes from tsunamis.
In this paper, we describe the record of a probable tsunami occurring close to the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary in a coastal marine sedimentary succession in the Boulonnais area (northern France). It is a contribution to the few ancient tsunamites described in the literature, and one of the very rare events of that type described to our knowledge in the European Mesozoic.
Section snippets
Geological setting and outcrops description
By the end of the Jurassic, the Boulonnais region was a shallow epicontinental sea close to a low-relief area, the London–Brabant Massif (Fig. 1). The Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian and Tithonian) succession of the Boulonnais is composed mainly of mudstones and sandstones deposited in offshore and shoreface environments on a homoclinal ramp system. The vertical succession of facies records sea-level fluctuations and episodic tectonic rejuvenation of the London–Brabant Massif (Proust et al., 1995,
Pointe aux Oies
The soft-sediment deformations were called “diapiric structures” by Ager and Wallace (1970), who suggested that water saturation, loading, or even a “sudden shock” may have been involved in their formation. Townson and Wimbledon (1979) considered that the “diapiric movement” was due to the release of overpressured pore waters in sediments situated between two permeability barriers, the hardground below and the fine sands above. They associated the soft-sediment deformations with a transgression
Conclusions
A new interpretation of some of the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary facies of the Boulonnais is proposed. A tsunami event is suggested to explain an unusual sedimentary deposit, which cannot be easily explained by normal paralic/shallow marine sedimentary processes. The characteristic features observed in the Boulonnais and possibly related to a tsunami event are:
- (1)
a strong erosional base associated with scouring of an early cemented surface
- (2)
load structures, soft-sediment deformations
- (3)
pebbles,
Acknowledgments
We thank B. Lathuilière (University of Nancy 1, France) for identification of a coral sample, and Denise Pons (University of Paris 6, France) for examination of the wood of Pointe aux Oies outcrop.
References (61)
- et al.
The environmental history of the Boulonnais, France
Proc. Geol. Assoc.
(1966) - et al.
Seismites in a Proterozoic tidal succession, Singhbhum, Bihar, India
Sediment. Geol.
(1998) - et al.
Late-Pleistocene seismites from Lake Issyk-Kul, the Tien Shan range, Kyrghyzstan
Sediment. Geol.
(2004) - et al.
Deep-sea tsunami deposits triggered by the explosion of Santorini (3500 y BP), eastern Mediterranean
Sediment. Geol.
(2000) - et al.
Evidence for a large earthquake and tsunami 100–400 years ago on western Vancouver Island
B. C. Q. Res.
(1994) - et al.
The Purbeckian facies of the Boulonnais: a tsunami deposit hypothesis (Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary, northern France)
C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris
(2000) - et al.
High energy marine flood deposits on Astypalaea Island, Greece: possible evidence for the AD 1956 southern Aegean tsunami
Mar. Geol.
(2000) Seismites dans le Jurassique supérieur du Bassin anglo-parisien (Normandie, Oxfordien supérieur, Calcaire gréseux de Hennequeville)
Sediment. Geol.
(1995)- et al.
Bedforms produced by impact-generated tsunami ∼ 2.6 Ga Hamersley basin, Western Australia
Sediment. Geol.
(2000) - et al.
Tsunami-related scour-and-drape undulations in Middle Pliocene restricted-bay carbonate deposits (Salento, south Italy)
Sediment. Geol.
(2000)
Sedimentary differences between the 1993 Hokkaido-nansei-oki tsunami and the 1959 Miyakojima typhoon at Taisei, southwestern Hokkaido, northern Japan
Sediment. Geol.
Tsunami-induced conglomerates in Miocene upper bathyal deposits, Chita Peninsula, central Japan
Sediment. Geol.
Sedimentary record of the 1872 earthquake and “Tsunami” at Owens Lake, southeast California
Sediment. Geol.
Depositional facies and sedimentary successions of earthquake-induced tsunami deposits in Upper Pleistocene incised valley fills, central Japan
Sediment. Geol.
The Portlandian strata of the Bas-Boulonnais, France
Proc. Geol. Assoc.
Evaporites and associated sediments of the basal Purbeck Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Dorset
Proc. Geol. Assoc.
The distribution and significance of trace fossils in the uppermost Jurassic rocks of the Boulonnais, Northern France
Liquefaction and fluidization structures in Messinian storm deposits (Bajo Segura Basin, Betic Cordillera, southern Spain)
Int. J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.)
Tsunami sedimentary facies deposited by the Storegga tsunami in shallow marine basins and coastal lakes, western Norway
Sedimentology
Record-breaking height for 8000-year-old tsunami in the North Atlantic
EOS
A tsunami deposit at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary in Texas
Science
Tsunami
The underrated hazard
The Jurassic geology of Dorset
Lower cretaceous gas-field in Holland
Nouveaux restes de vertébrés du Jurassique terminal du Boulonnais (Nord de la France)
Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh.
Wave-induced liquefaction: a modern example from the Bay of Fundy
Sedimentology
Tsunami deposits
Pure Appl. Geophys.
Geochemical signals of the Late Jurassic, marine Mjølnir impact
Meteorit. Planet. Sci.
Mjølnir structure: an impact crater in the Barents Sea
Geology
Cited by (32)
Do soft sediment deformations in the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic of the UK record seismic activity during the break-up of Pangea?
2021, Proceedings of the Geologists' AssociationCitation Excerpt :Soft sediment deformations (SSDs) are observed in almost all types of environments, from alluvial fan and fluvial systems (Plaziat and Ahmamou, 1998); shallow marine and tidal (Pope et al., 1997; Schnyder et al., 2005; Greb and Archer, 2007; Ghosh et al., 2012); lacustrine (Marco et al., 1996; Ken-Tor et al., 2001) and deep marine – turbidite environments (Allen, 1977; Bergerat et al., 2011; Homberg et al., 2013; Basilone et al., 2015).
Middle Jurassic evolution of a northern Tethyan carbonate ramp (Alborz Mountains, Iran)
2021, Sedimentary GeologySedimentology of tsunamiites reflecting chaotic events in the geological record - Significance and problems
2020, Tsunamiites: Features and ImplicationsSedimentary architecture, depositional facies and diagenetic response to intracratonic deformation and climate change inferred from outcrops for a pivotal period (Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary, Paris Basin, France)
2018, Sedimentary GeologyCitation Excerpt :These flexural events at a very local scale or at regional scale are interpreted as a consequence of the extensional tectonics in southern and northern Europe, related to the opening of the central Atlantic Ocean and North Sea (Ziegler, 1988; Jacquin and de Graciansky, 1998a). This geodynamic context at the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary was favorable to numerous earthquakes, potentially responsible for tsunamis, one of them being recognized from deposits in the Purbeck beds of the Boulonnais area (France; Deconinck et al., 2000; Schnyder et al., 2005a). After this active geodynamic period, or set of events, carbonate sedimentation resumed with the deposition of supratidal dolomitic facies in the study area, meaning that the JCU may only be considered as the onset of the demise of the carbonate platform in the Paris Basin, but not the only cause of it.