Direct measurement of dissolved dinitrogen to refine reactive modelling of denitrification in agricultural soils
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Nitrate (NO3−) is considered as the most widespread inorganic contaminant in both surface waters and groundwater due to agricultural fertilization practices (Puckett et al., 2011) and other sources like industrial and sewer systems (Wakida and Lerner, 2005) or wet and dry deposition (Bauer et al., 2007). It has been shown that the agricultural fertilization practices have risen the reactive nitrogen (N) inputs into the terrestrial biosphere up to a factor two respect to the 1860 levels (Galloway et al., 2004). It is also renowned that the ecological and toxicological effects generated by inorganic N pollution in aquatic ecosystems are detrimental (Camargo and Alonso, 2006). Recently, it has been shown that the vadose zone can be considered as a large NO3− reservoir, actually unaccounted in the global N cycle (Ascott et al., 2017). Thus, to understand the processes that occur in both the vadose and saturated zones, accurate data sets are needed to unravel NO3− fate from the application to the eventual leaching or transformation. Reactive N attenuation from surface to groundwater systems may take place via bacterial heterotrophic denitrification, using NO3− as electron acceptor and a carbon (C) source as electron donor, with the production of N gases (Rivett et al., 2008). This process has been extensively studied in superficial ecosystems, showing that the increasing trend of anthropogenic reactive N inputs can be overwhelming for the freshwater ecosystems (Seitzinger, 2008). Besides, other reactive gasses like N2O and NO are often produced in well drained and tilled agricultural fields via incomplete denitrification (Mosier et al., 1998; Loick et al., 2016; Charles et al., 2017). Although, N2O and NO production became less important in anaerobic conditions, while N2 is the dominant denitrification product (Firestone and Davidson, 1989). To prevent such a disaster, best management practices of agricultural lands are more and more required and adopted by single nations or by international agencies (Tilman et al., 2002). One of the possible way out is to try to augment the labile organic content of soils, which in turn can diminish NO3− leaching via denitrification or by establishing wetlands or biofilters (Dinnes et al., 2002). Acetate is a good candidate as electron donor, since it is the main intermediate species in many biodegradation pathways of organic compounds, thus it is an appropriate C source to trigger denitrification processes (Castaldelli et al., 2013a). Beside denitrification, other processes can occur in the subsurface altering the reactive N fate, like the dissimilatory NO3− reduction to ammonium (NH4+) (Rütting et al., 2011), anammox and co-denitrification by fungi (Long et al., 2013) or autotrophic NO3− reduction (Chen et al., 2018). Then, new studies must take into account the role of different pathways that can affect NO3− in soils. In the recent past, to understand the chemical and biological processes responsible for the natural reduction of NO3− in soils and groundwater, a number of laboratory experiments and reactive-transport modelling studies have been performed (Mastrocicco et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2016). Numerical models are now also configured to incorporate isotopic fractionation processes controlled by kinetic and equilibrium conditions (Rodríguez-Escales et al., 2014; Vavilin and Rytov, 2015), but actually there is still a lack of accurate measurements and modelling of gaseous end-product of denitrification, like dinitrogen (N2).
The main purpose of this research was to quantify the main biogeochemical reactions governing N2 exsolution and transport through the vadose/saturated zone interface, using laboratory mesocosms simulated via the reactive geochemical code PHREEQC(3) (Parkhurst and Appelo, 2013).
As far as the authors are aware, this is the first biogeochemical modelling study in agricultural soils constrained by major redox species, combined with a high precision membrane inlet mass spectrometer (MIMS) employed to track N2 production.
Section snippets
Study sites
In Italy, the Po River valley is the largest and most intensively farmed alluvial plain, and is heavily impacted by NO3− contamination in groundwater (Soana et al., 2017) and surface water (Panepinto et al., 2016). In the coastal area of the Po River valley, four sites (representative of the most common soil types) have been extensively studied in the last decade within various national and international research projects. The four sites have different soils characteristics: sandy, peaty,
Reactive modelling
NH4+ concentrations were always below detection limits (<0.5 μmol/L), CH4 concentrations never exceeded 0.5 μmol/L, with most values <0.2 μmol/L, without any temporal increase or difference among treatments (data not shown).
Fig. 2 illustrates that the model results fit well with the observed reagents and products of denitrification during the experiments. The primary electron donor (acetate for CCR-Ace and SAP-Ace mesocosms and SOM for CCR and SAP mesocosms) and the terminal electron acceptor
Discussion
Although, the MIMS technique does not distinguish between denitrification and anammox, which are both N2 producing processes, anammox was excluded as active processes due to the absence of NH4+; for the same reason also DNRA was not considered. Since CH4 was always close to detection limit, methanogenesis was considered as an insignificant pathway in organic matter degradation in the two soils studied. The monitoring of the redox sensitive geochemical species (Fig. 3), allowed excluding other
Conclusions
The reactive modelling fully described the complete NO3− degradation to N2 in both acetate amended and unamended mesocosms, in conjunction with the concomitant DIC increase. These evidences, corroborated by the good model fit, indicate that the main pathway of NO3− attenuation in these soils is denitrification in presence of acetate as electron donor, while calcite and dolomite acted as a buffer for pH, preserving optimal denitrification conditions. On the contrary, when labile C sources were
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the Emilia-Romagna Region within the Rural Development Programme (PSR) 2014-2020 and within the POR FESR 2007-2013 Programme for the development of the regional High Technology Network. A special thank goes to Dr. Fabio Vincenzi for his technical support and to Dr. Elisa Soana for the calculations of the MIMS data. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their positive feedbacks and remarks.
References (35)
- et al.
Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment
Environ. Int.
(2006) - et al.
Global nitrous oxide emission factors from agricultural soils after addition of organic amendments: a meta-analysis
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2017) - et al.
Nitrogen fertilization stimulated soil heterotrophic but not autotrophic respiration in cropland soils: a greater role of organic over inorganic fertilizer
Soil Biol. Biochem.
(2018) - et al.
Characterization of denitrifying granular sludge with and without the addition of external carbon source
Bioresour. Technol.
(2012) - et al.
Denitrification as a source of nitric oxide emissions from incubated soil cores from a UK grassland soil
Soil Biol. Biochem.
(2016) - et al.
Numerical assessment of effective evapotranspiration from maize plots to estimate groundwater recharge in lowlands
Agric. Water Manag.
(2010) - et al.
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I. A discussion of principles
J. Hydrol.
(1970) - et al.
Integrated modeling of biogeochemical reactions and associated isotope fractionations at batch scale: a tool to monitor enhanced biodenitrification applications
Chem. Geol.
(2014) - et al.
Mitigation of nitrogen pollution in vegetated ditches fed by nitrate-rich spring waters
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2017) - et al.
Nitrate denitrification with nitrite or nitrous oxide as intermediate products: stoichiometry, kinetics and dynamics of stable isotope signatures
Chemosphere
(2015)
Non-agricultural sources of groundwater nitrate: a review and case study
Water Res.
Comparison of three models for simulating N2O emissions from paddy fields under water-saving irrigation
Atmos. Environ.
Nitrate bioreduction in redox-variable low permeability sediments
Sci. Total Environ.
Global patterns of nitrate storage in the vadose zone
Nat. Commun.
Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: a global simulation including aerosols and tropospheric ozone
Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Linking dissolved organic carbon, acetate and denitrification in agricultural soils
Environ. Earth Sci.
Nitrogen budget in a lowland coastal area within the Po River Basin (Northern Italy): Multiple evidences of equilibrium between sources and internal sinks
Environ. Manag.
Cited by (13)
Evaluating the effects of plastic film mulching duration on soil nitrogen dynamic and comprehensive benefit for corn (Zea mays L.) field
2023, Agricultural Water ManagementLegacy nitrate and trace metal (Mn, Ni, As, Cd, U) pollution in anaerobic groundwater: Quantifying potential health risk from “the other nitrate problem”
2022, Applied GeochemistryCitation Excerpt :Without denitrification the fraction of samples with nitrate being above regulatory limits would more than double under agricultural and urban land and even triple under forests (Table S1). Because N2 produced by denitrification in soils might easily escape to the atmosphere, these estimates might be conservative for samples where denitrification predominately took place in the soil rather than the aquifer (Mastrocicco et al., 2019), although some N2 still might accumulate in the unsaturated zone before eventually recharging to groundwater (Gooddy et al., 2002). This is also true for the gaseous reactive intermediates of the denitrification process.
Optimisation of an original CO<inf>2</inf>-Enhanced natural treatment system for reclaiming and reusing anaerobically digested strong wastewater from animal breeding industry
2021, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :On the one hand, nitrification apparently took place in all treatments (except T1 (control)), with the effluent (NO2−+NO3−)-N concentration increasing significantly over time (p < 0.05) and eventually exceeding the concentration in the influent (Fig. 3a). A simple follow-up denitrification unit might be required to handle (NO2−+NO3−)-N before final discharge, as relying on soil organic matter, mainly in the form of inert humus, to provide sufficient bioavailable organic carbon (as a substrate for denitrifying microorganisms) had been verified to be impractical in both experimental and modelling studies (Chen and Fukushi, 2016a; Mastrocicco et al., 2019). Fortunately, organic materials/wastes with large amounts of bioavailable carbon are usually highly available in rural areas (Zareei, 2018).
Assessment of the main factors affecting the dynamics of nutrients in two rainfed cereal watersheds
2020, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :The influence of texture is not sufficiently clear, although it is known that clay soils retain more organic matter than sandy ones when the same organic inputs are applied (Matus and Mairie, 2000). Denitrification regarding soil characteristics and texture has been also widely studied (Cambardella et al., 1999; Mastrocicco et al., 2019, 2011). Although some studies evidence a strong influence of texture on denitrification processes, with higher rates observed in soils with high content of clay and lower rates in soils with a high content of sand (D'Haene et al., 2003), other studies reported no significant differences regarding texture (Hofstra and Bouwman, 2005).
The role of clays, clay minerals and clay-based materials for nitrate removal from water systems: A review
2020, Applied Clay ScienceCitation Excerpt :Following heavy rainfall or irrigation, these nitrates can leach into groundwater and contaminate drinking water resources (Lu et al., 2019). Around 20% of soil nitrates originating from N fertilizers end up in groundwater (Yadav, 1997; Lu et al., 2019), thus making nitrate the most widespread inorganic contaminant of groundwater, with concentrations frequently exceeding 50 mg/L (WHO and Regional, 2002; Puckett et al., 2011; Mastrocicco et al., 2019). In Europe, levels of N released into the environment have increased steadily since the end of the Second World War chiefly due to modernized agricultural practices and the increased application of nitrogenous fertilizers (Puckett et al., 2011).