Elsevier

Science of The Total Environment

Volume 511, 1 April 2015, Pages 516-522
Science of The Total Environment

Spotlight on fish: Light pollution affects circadian rhythms of European perch but does not cause stress

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.094Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We studied the impact of light at night on melatonin and cortisol rhythms in perch

  • Sampling was non-invasive and hormones were extracted out of the holding water

  • Melatonin rhythm was significantly impaired by artificial light at night

  • Cortisol was not affected by artificial light at night

Abstract

Flora and fauna evolved under natural day and night cycles. However, natural light is now enhanced by artificial light at night, particularly in urban areas. This alteration of natural light environments during the night is hypothesised to alter biological rhythms in fish, by effecting night-time production of the hormone melatonin. Artificial light at night is also expected to increase the stress level of fish, resulting in higher cortisol production. In laboratory experiments, European perch (Perca fluviatilis) were exposed to four different light intensities during the night, 0 lx (control), 1 lx (potential light level in urban waters), 10 lx (typical street lighting at night) and 100 lx. Melatonin and cortisol concentrations were measured from water samples every 3 h during a 24 hour period. This study revealed that the nocturnal increase in melatonin production was inhibited even at the lowest light level of 1 lx. However, cortisol levels did not differ between control and treatment illumination levels. We conclude that artificial light at night at very low intensities may disturb biological rhythms in fish since nocturnal light levels around 1 lx are already found in urban waters. However, enhanced stress induction could not be demonstrated.

Introduction

Recent decades have seen a profound transformation of nightscapes, with an increasing proportion of the Earth's surface being illuminated at night. Global light emissions increased at a rate of around 3–6% per year in recent decades (Hölker et al., 2010a). This substantial transformation demonstrates a pressing need to understand the effects of artificial light at night on biological processes. In particular, information regarding the ecological impact of light pollution on animal populations and whole ecosystems is crucial. Possible consequences of artificial light at night on many behavioural and physiological processes in various classes of animals have been reviewed recently (Gaston et al., 2013, Hölker et al., 2010b, Navara and Nelson, 2007). Most of these processes are coupled to circadian or seasonal rhythms (Falcón et al., 2003) which may be disrupted by light pollution.

In fish, seasonal rhythms include reproduction, growth and development, and migration, while patterns like locomotor activity, food intake, shoaling or diel vertical migration are mainly driven by circadian rhythms (Boeuf and Le Bail, 1999, Downing and Litvak, 2002, Duston and Bromage, 1986, Lowe, 1952, Mehner, 2012, Ryer and Olla, 1998, Vowles et al., 2014). The most important mechanism of the circadian system in vertebrates is the light-dependent production of melatonin (production at night, suppression during the day) by the pineal organ. The pineal organ of fish is light-sensitive and directly processes photoperiodic information, resulting in a circadian melatonin rhythm that provides periodic information for cells and organs, such as time of the day and season (Ekstrzm and Meissl, 1997, Falcón and Collin, 1989, Kulczykowska et al., 2010, Underwood and Goldman, 1987).

The influence of artificial light at night on fish has been an area of interest for researchers with respect to aquaculture, e.g., how to control growth (Biswas et al., 2005, Boeuf and Le Bail, 1999, Kissil et al., 2001), development (Porter et al., 1998, Thrush et al., 1994) and reproduction (Kissil et al., 2001). However, while photoperiod manipulation has proven beneficial for aquaculture, artificial light can have detrimental effects in nature.

Most studies that investigated the influence of artificial light at night on the melatonin rhythm used high light intensities above 100 lx and only a few studies using low light intensities (Bayarri et al., 2002, Migaud et al., 2006a, Takemura et al., 2006), which may occur in light polluted urban areas. However, none of these studies addressed the possible effect of artificial light at night on the physiology of fish and very little is known about dose–response relationships for a range of biological impacts (Gaston et al., in press).

Cortisol is the most measured indicator for stress in fish. Moreover, two of the major actions of cortisol in fish are hydromineral balance (e.g., seawater adaption in migratory fish) and energy metabolism (carbohydrate, protein, lipid metabolism).

In most fish species, blood levels of cortisol also exhibit a circadian rhythm. However this rhythm is species specific, subjected to seasonal influences and affected by other environmental cues (Wendelaar Bonga, 1997). In goldfish (Carassius auratus) for instance, the schedule is linked to the photoperiod and peak titres occur around light onset, minimum titres at light offset (Noeske and Spieler, 1983). In humans this pattern is called the cortisol awakening response (Kirschbaum et al., 2000) and was also found in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) (Binuramesh and Michael, 2011). However, in goldfish the feeding schedule can override photoperiod to trigger circadian serum-cortisol variations (Spieler and Noeske, 1984). In some salmonids, cortisol peaks were found during the dark phase of the photoperiod but also connected to feeding time (Laidley and Leatherland, 1988, Pickering and Pottinger, 1983), whereas in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) no circadian rhythm could be identified (Audet et al., 1986).

Previous studies regarding the effect of light at night on cortisol levels revealed no obvious impact. But most studies were working with prolonged or continuous photoperiods and relatively high light intensities. Biswas et al., 2006, Biswas et al., 2008 for example tested a constant illumination of 1500 lx on red sea bream (Pagrus major) and striped knifejaw (Oplegnathus fasciatus), but cortisol concentrations showed no significant differences to normal photoperiods. Bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) showed no changes of circadian cortisol levels when subjected to 5, 15 or 150 lx compared to a 0 lx control (Honryo et al., 2013). However, the invasive sampling procedures (blood or whole body sampling) in the abovementioned examples may have introduced a sampling artefact that obscured potential differences in the stress response between treatments. The dynamics of the stress response to handling stress associated with surgical sampling methods cannot be generalized and seems to be highly species specific ranging from a few minutes (Ramsay et al., 2009) to one or several hours (Wendelaar Bonga, 1997). However, with a non-invasive sampling method, existing differences in cortisol rhythms in response to artificial light at night might be uncovered.

Our study presents data on the influence of artificial light at night on circadian rhythm and stress response of European perch (Perca fluviatilis). Perch belong to the most dominant fish species in Central European aquatic systems and inhabit a wide range of habitats, including all types of lakes and most streams (Kottelat and Freyhof, 2007). Perch are diurnal feeders and become inactive during the night, especially in the presence of nocturnal predators (Hölker et al., 2007).

We measured melatonin concentrations to assess the influence of light on the biological rhythms of perch. Cortisol was measured to evaluate the stress response to light pollution. In contrast to earlier studies, we based our results exclusively on non-invasive measurements, by extracting the hormones from water samples taken without disturbing the experimental animals and determined their concentrations. Ellis et al. (2004) proved a correlation between concentrations of cortisol in water and serum in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with a phase delay of about 2 h due to excretion route and accumulation in the water. The work of Ellis et al. (2005) indicated a similar correlation for melatonin.

We hypothesised that artificial light at night has a clear effect on the natural circadian rhythm of melatonin production. We expected that with increasing light intensity, the nocturnal melatonin production is suppressed. Furthermore, we hypothesised a stress response caused by the presence of artificial light at night. Using non-invasive methods we expected to identify an increase in cortisol concentrations corresponding to increasing light intensity, especially during the dark phase of the photoperiod.

Section snippets

Experimental fish

European perch were taken from an existing population at the Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) in Berlin, Germany. They were originally obtained from the nearby Lake Müggelsee that has a periurban surrounding including forests and housing. Prior to the experiment they were held in 600 L indoor tanks in a flow-through system with ground water, aeration and natural photoperiod and fed daily with frozen red bloodworms. Body mass of the fish at the time of the

Results

There were significant differences in melatonin tank water concentrations between the control (0 lx treatment) and all treatments (LMM treatment effect: F3 = 339.9; p = 0.000, Posthoc test Sidak: df 216; p  0.05) with melatonin concentration being up to three times higher in controls compared to light treatments (Fig. 1). 1 lx illumination was likewise significantly different to all other treatments and the control (LMM, Sidak). Control fish produced more melatonin over the 24 h sampling period and

Discussion

This study demonstrated that artificial light illuminating the water at night had a strong effect on the rhythm of melatonin production in European perch. Even at low light intensities of 1 lx, which is slightly brighter than the light produced by a full moon, there was already a substantial decrease of melatonin secretion. Fish in treatments with higher light intensities seemed to completely lack any circadian melatonin rhythm. Moreover, melatonin concentration in the water of the control tank

Conclusion

We found a strong effect of artificial light at night on the melatonin rhythm which leads us to conclude that light pollution in urban waters at realistic light levels has significant potential to inhibit circadian melatonin patterns. Considering the main task of melatonin-mediating between the current photoperiod and the different circadian and seasonal rhythms in a fish's life — it is likely that these rhythms will be altered too. Although light pollution is not yet measured consistently in

Acknowledgements

The authors thank T. Mehner, Alex Lumsdon and D. Murray for the helpful comments on the manuscript and M. Kunow and the students at the Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries for the technical support. Funding was provided by the Verlust der Nacht project (Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany, BMBF-033L038A).

References (69)

  • J. Falcón et al.

    Current knowledge on the melatonin system in teleost fish

    Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.

    (2010)
  • Á. García-López et al.

    Disruption of gonadal maturation in cultured Senegalese sole Solea senegalensis Kaup by continuous light and/or constant temperature regimes

    Aquaculture

    (2006)
  • F. Hölker et al.

    Light pollution as a biodiversity threat

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2010)
  • T. Ikegami et al.

    Impacts of moonlight on fish reproduction

    Mar. Genomics

    (2014)
  • A.K. Imsland et al.

    Growth, oxygen consumption and activity of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) reared under different temperatures and photoperiods

    Neth. J. Sea Res.

    (1995)
  • C.E. Kidd et al.

    Measuring multiple hormones from a single water sample using enzyme immunoassays

    Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.

    (2010)
  • G.W. Kissil et al.

    Long photoperiod delayed spawning and increased somatic growth in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)

    Aquaculture

    (2001)
  • C.W. Laidley et al.

    Circadian studies of plasma cortisol, thyroid hormone, protein, glucose and ion concentration, liver glycogen concentration and liver and spleen weight in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol.

    (1988)
  • D.W. Macquarrie et al.

    Photoperiod induced off-season spawning of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha)

    Aquaculture

    (1979)
  • H. Migaud et al.

    Influence of photoperiod on reproductive performances in Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis

    Aquaculture

    (2006)
  • D.J. Nichols et al.

    Plasma cortisol concentrations in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar: episodic variations, diurnal change, and short term response to adrenocorticotrophic hormone

    Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.

    (1984)
  • A.D. Pickering et al.

    Seasonal and diel changes in plasma cortisol levels of the brown trout, Salmo trutta L.

    Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.

    (1983)
  • M.J.R. Porter et al.

    The role of melatonin and the pineal gland on development and smoltification of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr

    Aquaculture

    (1998)
  • M.J.R. Porter et al.

    The use of cage lighting to reduce plasma melatonin in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and its effects on the inhibition of grilsing

    Aquaculture

    (1999)
  • J.M. Ramsay et al.

    Whole-body cortisol response of zebrafish to acute net handling stress

    Aquaculture

    (2009)
  • C.F. Randall et al.

    Melatonin rhythms in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) maintained under natural and out-of-phase photoperiods

    Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.

    (1995)
  • W.D. Riley et al.

    Street lighting delays and disrupts the dispersal of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fry

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2013)
  • L. Rodríguez et al.

    Long-term exposure to continuous light inhibits precocity in European male sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax, L.): hormonal aspects

    Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.

    (2005)
  • M.A. Thrush et al.

    The use of photoperiod in the production of out-of-season Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts

    Aquaculture

    (1994)
  • A.S. Vowles et al.

    Effects of avoidance behaviour on downstream fish passage through areas of accelerating flow when light and dark

    Anim. Behav.

    (2014)
  • A. Bani et al.

    Effects of different photoperiods on growth, stress and haematological parameters in juvenile great sturgeon Huso huso

    Aquac. Res.

    (2009)
  • M.J. Bayarri et al.

    Influence of light intensity, spectrum and orientation on sea bass plasma and ocular melatonin

    J. Pineal Res.

    (2002)
  • A. Brüning et al.

    Artificial light at night: implications for early life stages development in four temperate freshwater fish species

    Aquat. Sci.

    (2011)
  • J. Duston et al.

    Photoperiodic mechanisms and rhythms of reproduction in the female rainbow trout

    Fish Physiol. Biochem.

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text