Elsevier

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volume 131, 15 April 2013, Pages 247-261
Remote Sensing of Environment

Increased spectral resolution enhances coral detection under varying water conditions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Earth observation offers effective spatial and temporal coverage to monitor coral reefs in addition to in situ monitoring. Effective monitoring requires that significant substratum features are detectable by a sensor. This detectability is a function of the sensor spectral resolution, the depth and composition of the water column and the spectral characteristics of the substratum. Most broadband multispectral satellite sensors are ineffective in resolving reef substrata at depth due to a lack of spectral specificity. The aim of this simulation study was to quantify the level to which substrata can be classified by sensors with variable spectral resolutions over a range of depths and water qualities and also to improve and quantify the definition of substratum detectability (the measure to which a substratum can be resolved from the water column) and substratum separability (the measure to which a substratum pair can be resolved from each other and from the water column). Three sensors were selected, representing hyperspectral data (CASI with 30 spectral bands) and multispectral data (WorldView-2 with 8 bands, and QuickBird with 4 bands). Spectral separability of substratum reflectance spectra (convolved to the spectral resolution of the three sensors) were compared within two contrasting water columns (reef-oceanic and coastal) over a range of water column depths. Metrics for substratum detectability and substratum separability were determined. As spectral resolution increases from QB to WV2 to CASI, end-members can be resolved to greater depths (e.g. from two to six meters in a coastal water column). The additional three spectral bands in the visible part of the spectrum of the WV2 sensor, as compared to QB, increase the applicability of multispectral sensors to systematic coral reef remote sensing. Increase in water column attenuation, due to higher concentrations of water column constituents, causes loss of substratum detectability and substratum separability. This effect can be partly compensated for by increased spectral resolution. For example, although the CASI and WV2 sensor performed comparably in a very shallow coastal water column (e.g. at 2 m depth), the higher spectral resolution of the CASI sensor enhanced spectral separability, resulting in higher substratum separability in deeper water than WV2. With more spectral bands, more substratum end-member reflectances are distinct from the water column signal to greater depth. This implies that higher spectral resolution will enhance bathymetry retrieval, especially within coastal waters. The quantitative framework of this study extends findings of previous contextual coral reef substratum mapping studies. It confirms that higher spectral resolution (i.e. WV2 and CASI) earth observation data significantly enhances coral reef classification capability to increased depths or to the same depth in a more turbid water column. The conclusions of this study can also be extended to coastal ecosystems.

Highlights

► Higher spectral resolution enables a more accurate substratum differentiation. ► Broad classes can be identified with all sensor-types in deeper waters. ► Finer class separability in deep water is possible with higher spectral resolution. ► Higher spectral resolution enhances depth retrieval, especially in coastal waters.

Introduction

Coral reefs are widely recognized as an important resource for tourism, fisheries and local economies but are susceptible to large-scale processes, such as rising ocean temperatures (Hoegh-Guldberg, 1999), changes in ocean water biogeochemistry (LeDrew et al., 2000), anthropogenic effects (Riegl et al., 2009) and competition by invasive species (Riegl et al., 2009). Effective management and conservation of coral reefs requires periodic monitoring to detect environmental changes, however, in situ monitoring of protected coral reef habitats is often constrained by their remote location and often vast extents.

Satellite remote sensing offers effective spatial and temporal coverage to monitor coral reefs in the periods between routine in situ monitoring campaigns and after catastrophic events (e.g. Bahuguna et al., 2008). However, consistent mapping of coral reef systems from satellite sources is often hampered by unknown water quality parameters (Lubin et al., 2001) and lack of accurate information on the substratum types present at the time of image acquisition (Holden & LeDrew, 1998a). Hochberg and Atkinson (2003) identified two fundamental requirements for remote sensing of coral reefs, namely that each coral reef substratum-type should have characteristic spectral features and that those spectral features can be detected by a specific sensor. Most historical multispectral satellite sensors are incapable of effectively resolving reef substrata, such as living, dead and bleached corals and functional forms of algae, due to the limited number (usually four) and lack of specificity of their spectral bands (Andréfouët et al., 2001, Hedley et al., 2004, Hochberg et al., 2003). However, a new generation of satellite sensors with higher spectral and spatial resolution, such as the WorldView-2 sensor, even with broad spectral bands, may contribute to the solution of this problem.

Efforts to classify coral reef systems, as well as other marine systems such as coastal seagrass meadows and macroalgae, from satellite data traditionally included implementing supervised classification techniques, for example, Spectral Angle Mapping (SAM) (Casal et al., 2011, Kutser and Jupp, 2006), spectral clustering (Casal et al., 2011, Kutser and Jupp, 2006, Vahtmaë and Kutser, 2007), derivative analysis (Holden and LeDrew, 1998b, Karpouzli et al., 2004, Kutser and Jupp, 2006), and spectral mixture analysis (Goodman and Ustin, 2007, Hedley et al., 2004, Van der Meer, 1999).

These empirical classification approaches are often confounded by the effect of varying water depth and water quality across the image (Green et al., 1996, Holden and LeDrew, 1998a, Holden et al., 2001, Kutser et al., 2003). Water depth and water quality influence light attenuation across the water column, impacting on the ability to detect subsurface species, density of cover and/or color of substrata from image data.

Subsurface irradiance reflectance, measured above a water column where part of the reflectance at the surface is composed of a bottom signal (optically shallow), is a combination of the downwelling light and two upwelling light-streams: one from the substratum and one from the backscattered light in the water column itself (Maritorena et al., 1994) and can be expressed as:rrs=rrsdp+expKdzRsubexpκBzrrsdpexpκCzwhere the subsurface irradiance reflectance (rrs), measured over an optically shallow water body with a given depth (z) is equal to the subsurface irradiance reflectance of an infinitely deep water column (rrsdp) plus the difference between the product of bottom irradiance reflectance (Rsub), attenuated vertically upward (κB), and the product of the vertically upward attenuated (κC) infinitely deep water column irradiance reflectance (rrsdp) times the vertical downward attenuation of the downwelling light stream (Kd) (Brando et al., 2009, Dekker et al., 2006, Maritorena et al., 1994).

The quantities describing the underwater lightfield (i.e. rrsdp, Kd, κB, κC) are influenced by concentrations of the bio-optical constituents within the water column, including phytoplankton, suspended material and colored dissolved organic material. To circumvent light attenuation variations in water bodies, various image-based techniques were developed. These include exploring statistics within the image, such as creating linear models across known benthos at various depths (e.g. Mishra et al., 2006, Vahtmaë and Kutser, 2007), developing band ratios and indices (e.g. Lyzenga, 1981, Mishra et al., 2006) and contextual editing (Mumby et al., 1998). As most of these techniques are image-based, they can often be site specific, sensor specific and/or time specific (Kutser et al., 2003).

Analytical and semi-analytical approaches are based on radiative transfer theory and employ algorithms to map substratum type and benthic cover from imagery which incorporate the effects of water column constituents and substratum spectral reflectance (Holden & LeDrew, 2002). This enables a per-pixel analysis of images of submerged habitats, accounting for the confounding effects of water column depth and water quality parameters (Lee et al., 1998, Lee et al., 1999, Lee et al., 2001). Lee et al. (2001) proposed a semi-analytical implementation of Eq. (1) (Maritorena et al., 1994), incorporating a series of semi-analytical relationships based on the Mobley (1994) radiative transfer model to relate the four quantities rrsdp, Kd, κB, and κC to absorption and backscattering.

When substratum irradiance reflectance (Rsub, Eq. 1) is considered in an optically shallow system, it is generally described by a series of representative reflectance spectra (spectral libraries) of the substratum-types present. As differential attenuation by the water column will modify the spectral signature of an object at depth (Lyzenga, 1981, Maritorena et al., 1994), the selection of representative substratum spectra that will remain distinct at known depths or optical water quality ranges, is an important consideration. Although Hochberg and Atkinson (2000) and Phinn et al. (2008), for example, have shown that the three most elementary biotic reef classes (sand, coral and algae) are spectrally distinct and can be accurately classified to a depth of at least 3.5 m within a complex coastal water column in a hyperspectral image, applying the same spectral libraries to the limited spectral resolution of multispectral data may not yield the same accuracies. Due to the increased spectral width of each multispectral band, the sharpness of the spectral features of the data may be diminished (Dekker et al., 1992) and, consequently, the ability to resolve distinct spectral features in the substratum spectra may be compromised with increasing water depth.

This study aims to quantify the level to which substrata can be resolved by sensor platforms with variable spectral resolutions within a water column over a range of depths and optical water qualities. The ability to detect a spectral signal from the substratum is dependent on the spectral optical depth of the water column, the brightness and spectral contrast of the substratum and the sensor design (Dekker et al., 2001). In this study, the ability to resolve distinct spectral features by sensors with different spectral resolutions will be based on a two-stage procedure, derived from measures of spectral difference. Firstly the substratum detectability is quantified to determine whether a substratum type is distinguishable from the optically deep water column, then the substratum separability will determine if variability between a pair of different substratum spectra was sufficient to be successfully distinguished from each other at a range of depths and water properties.

Studies of substratum spectral separability have shown that careful placement of hyperspectral bands (Fyfe, 2003, Holden and LeDrew, 1998a), and reduction of end-member variability in spectral mixture analysis (Somers et al., 2011), can improve retrieval of subpixel fractions and enable better species differentiation. Hedley et al. (2012) presented a systematic sensitivity analysis, outlining the environmental and sensor limitations for benthic mapping objectives in coral reefs with airborne hyperspectral sensors. They concluded that spectral variation of benthic types and sub-pixel mixing is the primary limiting factor for benthic mapping objectives. To our knowledge no similar study has been published on end-member separability of spaceborne multispectral sensors based on sensor characteristics, water quality and water column depth. This study will therefore compare the spectral separability of selected substratum reflectance spectra in coral reef systems within the East Marine Bioregion of Australia (Australian Government – Department of Environment, Water, Heritage & the Arts, 2009).

The bio-optical properties of natural water bodies are a continuum of bio-optical conditions between clear, oceanic waters, predominantly influenced by phytoplankton, and coastal waters characterized by a large variability in particulate and dissolved matter (D'Alimonte et al., 2007). Therefore, to quantify the effect of water column properties on substratum separability, in this study the overlying water column will be parameterized with two sets of water quality parameters, representative of reef-oceanic and coastal water types within the Australian East Marine Bioregion, over a range of water column depths. The aim is to quantify the depth to which substrata can be identified and mapped from sensor platforms with variable spectral resolutions (CASI, programmed with 30 aquatic ecosystem specific spectral bands, WorldView-2 with eight spectral bands and QuickBird-2 with four spectral bands).

Studies have also shown that lower classification accuracies may result from increased spatial resolutions due to different degrees of spectral mixing occurring in different pixel sizes, as well as the degree of spatial heterogeneity in the scene (Hochberg and Atkinson, 2003, Leiper et al., 2012, Lim et al., 2009, Vahtmaë and Kutser, 2007). An additional effect of increased spatial resolution is that less photons are recorded decreasing the signal to noise (SNR) for each pixel. In this study, the impact of the spectral resolution of the three sensors (CASI, WorldView-2 and QuickBird-2) will be assessed detached from the effects of spatial resolution as the end members are derived from field data, and therefore free of the image end-member extraction problems.

As the sensors being compared in this study are a mix of airborne and spaceborne sensors, the data analysis will be based on below-surface reflectance values, thus accounting for the atmospheric and water surface factors. Additionally, the environmental noise equivalent reflectance difference (NE∆rsE, Wettle et al, 2004) will be incorporated into the spectral analysis metric to account for the environmental and sensor configuration effects on image SNR.

Section snippets

Substratum spectral data

Substratum irradiance reflectance spectra (Rsub, Eq. 1), representative of selected benthic features found within the East Marine Bioregion of Australia were collected during field campaigns in the Lihou Reef National Marine Park (Coral Sea Territory, Australia, 17.583°S, 151.517°E, representative of a tropical coral reef system) and the Lord Howe Island Marine Park (NSW, Australia, 31.536°S, 159.076°E, representative of a more subtropical coral reef system). Sample biotic and abiotic benthic

Model output

Fig. 4 shows the simulated subsurface spectra, for incremental depths of the reef-oceanic water column, for the nine selected substratum-types (rrs (i,z, coastal, ASD) were simulated too but not shown). Some reflectance features are common for all substratum types. This includes lower reflectance values in the blue and green wavelengths and higher reflectance values in the red wavelengths.

Beyond 500 nm, rrs(i,z,w,s) for all substratum types decreases strongly with increasing water column depth

Discussion

The aim of this study was to understand and quantify the level to which substrata can be classified by sensors with increasing spectral resolution within a water column over a range of depths and water qualities. This study also improved and quantified the definition of substratum detectability (the measure to which a substratum can be resolved from the water column.) and substratum separability (the measure to which a substratum pair can be resolved from each other and from the water column).

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship, as well as a CSIRO Payne-Scott award to Elizabeth Botha. Comments by Stuart Phinn (University of Queensland) improved earlier versions of this manuscript.

References (77)

  • H. Holden et al.

    Measuring and modeling water column effects on hyperspectral reflectance in a coral reef environment

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (2002)
  • F.A. Kruse et al.

    The Spectral ImagProcessing System (SIPS). — Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (1993)
  • T. Kutser et al.

    On the possibility of mapping living corals to the species level based on their optical signatures

    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

    (2006)
  • T. Kutser et al.

    Mapping coral reef benthic substrates using hyperspectral space-borne images and spectral libraries

    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

    (2006)
  • T. Kutser et al.

    Assessing suitability of multispectral satellites for mapping benthic macroalgal cover in turbid coastal waters by means of model simulations

    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

    (2006)
  • A. Lim et al.

    The effects of ecologically determined spatial complexity on the classification accuracy of simulated coral reef images

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (2009)
  • D. Lubin et al.

    Spectral signatures of coral reefs: Features from space

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (2001)
  • S. Phinn et al.

    Mapping seagrass species, cover and biomass in shallow waters: An assessment of satellite multi-spectral and airborne hyper-spectral imaging systems in Moreton Bay (Australia)

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (2008)
  • K.S. Schmidt et al.

    Spectral discrimination of vegetation types in a coastal wetland

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (2003)
  • B. Somers et al.

    Endmember variability in spectral mixture analysis: A review

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (2011)
  • F. Van der Meer

    The effectiveness of spectral similarity measures for the analysis of hyperspectral imagery

    International Journal of Applied Earth Observation

    (2006)
  • M. Wettle et al.

    A methodology for retrieval of environmental noise equivalent spectra applied to four Hyperion scenes of the same tropical coral reef

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (2004)
  • A. Albert et al.

    Inversion of irradiance and remote sensing reflectance in shallow water between 400 and 800 nm for calculations of water and bottom properties

    Applied Optics

    (2006)
  • Australian Government — Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts

    The East Marine Bioregional Plan, Bioregional Profile

    (2009)
  • L. Bertels et al.

    Mapping of coral reefs using hyperspectral CASI data; a case study: Fordata, Tanimbar, Indonesia

    International Journal of Remote Sensing

    (2008)
  • V.E. Brando et al.

    Satellite hyperspectral remote sensing for estimating estuarine and coastal water quality

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

    (2003)
  • J. Chen et al.

    A multiresolution spectral angle-based hyperspectral classification method

    International Journal of Remote Sensing

    (2008)
  • A. Collin et al.

    Towards deeper measurements of tropical reefscape structure using the WorldView-2 spaceborne sensor

    Remote Sensing

    (2012)
  • D. D'Alimonte et al.

    A statistical index of bio-optical seawater types

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

    (2007)
  • A.G. Dekker et al.

    Remote sensing of seagrass ecosystems, use of spaceborne and airborne sensors

  • A.G. Dekker et al.

    Imaging spectrometry of water

  • A.G. Dekker et al.

    The effect of spectral band width and positioning on the spectral signature analysis of inland waters

    Remote Sensing of Environment

    (1992)
  • A.G. Dekker et al.

    Intercomparison of shallow water bathymetry, hydro-optics, and benthos mapping techniques in Australian and Caribbean coastal environments

    Limnology and Oceanography: Methods

    (2011)
  • J.G. Ferwerda et al.

    Satellite-based monitoring of tropical seagrass vegetation: Current techniques and future developments

    Hydrobiologia

    (2007)
  • S.K. Fyfe

    Spatial and temporal variation in spectral reflectance: Are seagrass species spectrally distinct?

    Limnology and Oceanography

    (2003)
  • J. Gao

    Digital analysis of remotely sensed imagery

  • J. Goodman et al.

    Classification of benthic composition in a coral reef environment using spectral unmixing

    Journal of Applied Remote Sensing

    (2007)
  • J.C. Granahan et al.

    An evaluation of atmospheric correction techniques using the spectral similarity scale

  • Cited by (62)

    • Satellite retrieval of benthic reflectance by combining lidar and passive high-resolution imagery: Case-I water

      2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, several factors, including water column turbidity, depth, sensor noise, spectral resolution, and spectral separability of different bottom types, could impact benthic retrieval performance by remote sensing (Garcia et al., 2015). The inherent optical properties (IOPs) of water and intervention from the atmosphere and water column all contribute to errors (Hedley et al., 2012; Botha et al., 2013). In clean shallow water regions, water-leaving radiance observed by satellites is comprised of both water column scattering and bottom reflectance signal, and there is no optimal method to separate the optical properties of water and various bottom types accurately.

    • Applications in remote sensing—natural landscapes

      2020, Data Handling in Science and Technology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text