Nighttime polar cloud detection with MODIS

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.06.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Cloud detection is the first step in studying the role of polar clouds in the global climate system with satellite data. In this paper, the cloud detection algorithm for the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) is evaluated with model simulations and satellite data collocated with radar/lidar observations at three Arctic and Antarctic stations. Results show that the current MODIS cloud mask algorithm performs well in polar regions during the day but does not detect more than 40% of the cloud cover over the validation sights at night. Two new cloud tests utilizing the 7.2 μm water vapor and 14.2 μm carbon dioxide bands, one new clear-sky test using the 7.2 μm band, and changes to the thresholds of several other tests are described. With the new cloud detection procedure, the misidentification of cloud as clear decreases from 44.2% to 16.3% at the two Arctic stations, and from 19.8% to 2.7% at the Antarctic station.

Introduction

The variation of cloud amount over the polar regions strongly influences planetary albedo gradients and surface energy exchanges (Key & Barry, 1989), which, in turn, affect regional and global climate (Curry et al., 1996). While cloud radiative properties are important in the study of clouds in polar climate systems, the first step is to determine when and where clouds exist. Limited surface observations of cloud cover in the Arctic and Antarctic makes the use of satellite data necessary. However, the detection of polar clouds is inherently difficult due to poor thermal and visible contrast between clouds and the underlying snow/ice surface, small radiances from the cold polar atmosphere, and ubiquitous temperature and humidity inversions in the lower troposphere (Lubin & Morrow, 1998).

Polar cloud detection from remote sensing data has been an area of active research during the past decade (Gao et al., 1998). The International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) employs a combination of spectral, temporal, and spatial tests to estimate clear-sky radiances and values of cloud forcing Key & Barry, 1989, Rossow & Garder, 1993, Rossow & Schiffer, 1991, Rossow et al., 1993 and increases the sensitivity of low-level cloud detection over snow and ice in polar regions by use of a new threshold test on 3.7 μm radiances (Rossow & Schiffer, 1999). The TOVS Polar Pathfinder cloud detection scheme uses a series of spectral tests to determine if a pixel is clear or cloudy (Schweiger et al., 1999). Statistical classification procedures, including maximum likelihood and Euclidean distance methods, have been applied in cloud detection algorithms Ebert, 1989, Key, 1990, Key et al., 1989, Welch et al., 1988, Welch et al., 1990, Welch et al., 1992. Single- and bispectral threshold methods have been developed and applied to polar data Ackerman, 1996, Gao et al., 1998, Inoue, 1987a, Inoue, 1987b, Minnis et al., 2001, Spangenberg et al., 2001, Spangenberg et al., 2002, Yamanouchi et al., 1987.

The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) on the NASA Terra and Aqua satellites provides an unprecedented opportunity for earth remote sensing. Its broad spectral range (36 bands between 0.415–14.235 μm), high spatial resolution (250 m for 5 bands, 500 m for 5 bands, and 1000 m for 29 bands), frequent observations of polar regions (28 times a day), and low thermal band instrument noise (roughly 0.1 K for a 300 K scene) provide a number of possibilities for improving cloud detection.

The goal of this study is to present improvements to the MODIS cloud mask algorithm for the detection of polar clouds at night. Changes to some of the current spectral tests are recommended, and new tests are proposed. The physical basis for these tests are described and supported by radiative transfer simulations. Validation of the satellite-derived cloud detection results is accomplished with surface-based cloud radar and lidar data from Alaska and the South Pole. It will be shown that nighttime cloud detection in polar regions with MODIS can achieve a high level of accuracy and is far more robust than what may be obtained with the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR). These enhancements will be incorporated into the next version of the NASA MODIS cloud mask.

Section snippets

Data and radiative transfer model

MODIS scans a swath width sufficient for providing global coverage every 2 days from a polar-orbiting, sun-synchronous platform at an altitude of 705 km King et al., 2003, Platnick et al., 2003. The MODIS Level 1B (MOD021KM) data product contains calibrated radiances for all 36 MODIS spectral bands at 1 km resolution. The MODIS geolocation data (MOD03) contain geodetic latitude and longitude, surface height above geoid, solar zenith and azimuth angles, satellite zenith and azimuth angles, and a

Current MODIS cloud mask algorithm

In the MODIS cloud mask algorithm (Ackerman et al., 1998), the polar regions are treated as one of several domains defined according to latitude, surface type, and solar illumination, including land, water, snow/ice, desert, and coast for both day and night. A series of spectral tests is applied to identify the presence of clouds. There are several groups of tests, with differing numbers of tests in each group, depending on the domain. A clear-sky confidence level ranging from 1 (high) to 0

Improvements to the current algorithm

The most significant improvement to the current algorithm involves the use of the 7.2-μm water vapor band. Under clear-sky conditions, the brightness temperature 7.2 μm is sensitive to temperatures near 800 hPa (Fig. 1), although the radiation at 11 μm originates primarily from the surface. Therefore, BT7.2-BT11 is related to the temperature difference between the 800 hPa layer and the surface. For the Streamer Arctic summer profile with no inversion, BT7.2-BT11 is approximately −20 K. When an

Application of the new algorithm

A comparison of results for the current and revised MODIS cloud mask in the Arctic and Antarctic at night is given in Table 6. In the Arctic, 16.3% of the clouds identified by radar/lidar are misidentified as clear by the modified MODIS cloud mask; 8.6% of the clear identified by radar/lidar is misidentified as cloud by the modified MODIS cloud mask. Compared with values of 44.2% and 8.1% from the current MODIS algorithm, this is a significant improvement. In the Antarctic, 2.7% of the cloud

Comparison of MODIS and AVHRR cloud mask results

MODIS has all the channels that AVHRR has, which makes the comparison of MODIS and AVHRR cloud mask results possible. All the AVHRR nighttime polar cloud detection tests, including the BT3.9-BT12, BT11-BT3.9, and BT11-BT12 cloud tests, are performed using the same MODIS channel. The comparison results are shown in Table 6. The misidentification rates of cloud as clear and clear as cloud are 38.1% and 5.7%, respectively, in Arctic for AVHRR, compared with 16.3% and 8.6% for MODIS. The

Conclusions

The current MODIS cloud mask algorithm works well in the polar regions during the daytime, except over Antarctica, where false cloud detection (clear scenes labeled as cloudy) is occasionally a problem. The algorithm misidentifies much cloud in the polar regions at night, as determined using radar and lidar data at two locations in the Arctic and one in the Antarctic.

In an attempt to improve cloud detection at night, radiative transfer simulations and radar/lidar data were used to evaluate the

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NASA grant NAS5-31367, NSF grant OPP-0240827, the NOAA SEARCH program, and the Integrated Program Office. Surface-based cloud radar and lidar data were provided through the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program and the NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory. We thank the MPLNET for its effort in establishing and maintaining the South Pole sites. The views, opinions, and findings contained in this report are those of the

References (37)

  • J. Key et al.

    Tools for atmospheric radiative transfer: Streamer and FluxNet

    Computers & Geosciences

    (1998)
  • S.A. Ackerman

    Global satellite observations of negative brightness temperature differences between 11 and 6.7 μm

    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    (1996)
  • S.A. Ackerman et al.

    Discriminating clear-sky from clouds with MODIS

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (1998)
  • A.T. Berendes et al.

    Cloud cover comparisons of the MODIS daytime cloud mask with surface instruments at the north slope of Alaska ARM site

    (2004)
  • J.R. Campbell et al.

    Full-time, eye-safe cloud and aerosol lidar observation at atmospheric radiation measurement program sites: Instrument and data processing

    Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    (2002)
  • E.E. Clothiaux et al.

    Objective determination of cloud heights and radar reflectivities using a combination of active remote sensors at the ARM CART sites

    Journal of Applied Meteorology

    (2000)
  • J.A. Curry et al.

    Overview of Arctic cloud and radiation characteristics

    Journal of Climate

    (1996)
  • E. Ebert

    Analysis of polar clouds from satellite imagery using pattern recognition and a statistical cloud analysis scheme

    Journal of Applied Meteorology

    (1989)
  • B.-C. Gao et al.

    Cloud detection over the Arctic region using airborne imaging spectrometer data during the daytime

    Journal of Applied Meteorology

    (1998)
  • T. Inoue

    A cloud type classification with NOAA 7 split-window measurements

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (1987)
  • Inoue, T. (1987b). The clouds and NOAA-7 AVHRR split window, report of the ISCCP workshop on cloud algorithms in the...
  • J.M. Intrieri et al.

    An annual cycle of Arctic cloud characteristics observed by radar and lidar at SHEBA

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (2002)
  • G. Kadosaki et al.

    Temperature dependence of brightness temperature difference of AVHRR infrared split window channels in the Antarctic

    Polar Meteorology and Glaciology

    (2002)
  • J. Key

    Cloud cover analysis with Arctic advanced very high resolution radiometer data: 2. Classification with spectral and textural measures

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (1990)
  • J. Key

    The cloud and surface parameter retrieval (CASPR) system for polar AVHRR

    (2002)
  • J. Key et al.

    Cloud cover analysis with Arctic AVHRR data: 1. Cloud detection

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (1989)
  • J. Key et al.

    Classification of merged AVHRR and SMMR Arctic data with neutral networks

    Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

    (1989)
  • M.D. King et al.

    Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and humidity from MODIS

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text