Elsevier

Respiratory Medicine

Volume 123, February 2017, Pages 48-55
Respiratory Medicine

Parametric response mapping on chest computed tomography associates with clinical and functional parameters in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.021Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Highlights

  • PRM biomarkers of small airway disease and emphysema increase with GOLD stage.

  • Both PRM biomarkers are associated with clinically important parameters for COPD.

  • PRM provides important information on disease phenotype and severity.

Abstract

Background

In the search for specific phenotypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) computed tomography (CT) derived Parametric Response Mapping (PRM) has been introduced. This study evaluates the association between PRM and currently available biomarkers of disease severity in COPD.

Methods

Smokers with and without COPD were characterized based on questionnaires, pulmonary function tests, body plethysmography, and low-dose chest CT scanning. PRM was used to calculate the amount of emphysema (PRMEmph) and non-emphysematous air trapping (i.e. functional small airway disease, PRMfSAD). PRM was first compared with other biomarkers for emphysema (Perc15) and air trapping (E/I-ratioMLD). Consequently, linear regression models were utilized to study associations of PRM measurements with clinical parameters.

Results

166 participants were included with a mean ± SD age of 50.5 ± 17.7 years. Both PRMEmph and PRMfSAD were more strongly correlated with lung function parameters as compared to Perc15 and E/I-ratioMLD. PRMEmph and PRMfSAD were higher in COPD participants than non-COPD participants (14.0% vs. 1.1%, and 31.6% vs. 8.2%, respectively, both p < 0.001) and increased with increasing GOLD stage (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that PRMfSAD was mainly associated with total lung capacity (TLC) (β = −7.90, p < 0.001), alveolar volume (VA) (β = 7.79, p < 0.001), and residual volume (β = 6.78, p < 0.001), whilst PRMEmph was primarily associated with Kco (β = 8.95, p < 0.001), VA (β = −6.21, p < 0.001), and TLC (β = 6.20, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

PRM strongly associates with the presence and severity of COPD. PRM therefore appears to be a valuable tool in differentiating COPD phenotypes.

Keywords

Computed tomography
Parametric response mapping
Copd
Phenotypes
Emphysema
Small airway disease

Abbreviations

6MWD
six minute walking distance
BMI
body mass index
COPD
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
CT
computed tomography
E/I-ratioMLD
expiration to inspiration ratio of mean lung density
FEV1
forced expiratory volume in one second
FVC
forced vital capacity
KCO
gas transfer corrected for lung volume
MRC
Medical Research Council
Perc15
emphysema score as 15th percentile of attenuation distribution curve on inspiratory scan
PRM
parametric response mapping
RV
residual volume
SGRQ
St George's Respiratory Questionnaire
TLC
total lung capacity
TLCO
diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide
VA
alveolar volume
VC
vital capacity

Cited by (0)