Clinical paperProtein S100B as a reliable tool for early prognostication after cardiac arrest
Introduction
Favourable outcome after cardiac arrest (CA) remains poor.1, 2 Early and reliable prognostication in CA patients seems of major importance. It could avoid futile treatment in patients with low chance of good outcome and could help clinicians to maximize treatment in patients who have a high likelihood of good outcome. However, guidelines emphasize that prognostication needs to be delayed, especially when targeted temperature management (TTM) is applied, and that decisions to limit care should be supported by a multimodal approach including clinical, biological, electrophysiological, and/or imaging parameters.2, 3
The usefulness of biomarkers to help clinicians in optimizing outcome prediction after CA is described mainly for Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE).2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 The initial NSE threshold validated in 2006 did not remain 100%-predictive after a broader evaluation in TTM-treated patients,2, 4, 5 while NSE accuracy seemed better at a delayed phase after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).3, 4, 7, 8, 9 Other biomarkers, such as lactate, pH, and creatinine levels on admission, have also been proposed to early predict outcome after CA.10, 11, 12, 13 However, specificity of these biomarkers is not 100%, leading to difficulties in assessing their precise cut-off values and predictive accuracy.4, 14 S100B protein (PS100B) is also presumed to be an interesting prognostication tool besides NSE.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 S100 protein is an intracellular dimeric protein with at least 4 sub-types, with S100A1B and S100BB being presently measured by usual tests.18 Besides S100A1 protein, S100B protein (PS100B) is normally found in astroglial and Schwann cells, and in neuroctodermal tumoral cells in pathological context, while small amount of PS100 was also found in adipocytes, muscles and chondrocytes. However, the large sub-TTM report by Stammet et al. showed that PS100B could be better than NSE at H24 to predict poor outcome, but the added information was limited in all prognosticating models with or without NSE.22, 23 However, biomarkers were here only sampled 24 h after ROSC and thereafter. Therefore, NSE contrary to PS100B is preferred in international guidelines as a validated and useful biomarker since it is superior at H48 and H72.2, 3
Considering the relative short half-life of PS100B compared to NSE, we hypothesized that PS100B could more accurately predict the outcome of CA patients in the early phase after ROSC compared to biomarkers such as lactate, pH, creatinine, and NSE. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of early PS100B sampling for prognostication in a large cohort of successfully resuscitated CA patients.
Section snippets
Methods
This prospective single-center study was carried out between March 2010 and May 2016 in the medical ICU of a university hospital (Lariboisiere Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France). The Ethics Committee of our institution approved the study (Institutional Review Board of Paris North Hospital: CERB GHU Nord, N°00006477). All surviving patients hospitalized for CA -or their next of kin if necessary- gave their written informed consent. The study was declared at National
Results
Among 370 CA without ECLS implementation, 351 patients without exclusion criteria were included, of which 21 were lost to 3-month follow-up (Supplemental Fig. S1). Patients’ general characteristics are described in Table 1 and Supplemental Table S1. The delay between CA and the first blood sample measuring NSE and PS100B (Admission) was 245 min [180–338], the delay between ROSC and the first sample being 220 min [155–316]. The delay between ROSC and the second sample (H24) was 23.5 h
Discussion
Results can be summarized as follows: 1/ Initial PS100B after admission was significantly associated with good outcome at hospital discharge and 3-month after CA; 2/ PS100B-Adm. was the most accurate biomarker to correctly predict good outcome as evaluated by ROCs analyses, compared with lactate, creatinine, pH, and NSE; 3/ An increasing PS100B value from admission to H24 was significantly associated with poor outcome (1 false negative); 4/ A PS100B-Adm. threshold of 3.78 μg/L correctly
Conclusions
In our cohort of comatose patients resuscitated from CA without ECLS implementation, PS100B after hospital admission was the biomarker with the best accuracy for outcome’s prognostication, and the sole biomarker with a high accuracy persisting during the first 3 days after CA.
Funding
No specific grant was received for this study. However, this study was performed under the coordination of both “Inserm UMR S-942 et le Centres des Ressources Biologiques” of Lariboisiere University Hospital, Paris, and the doctoral school “Frontieres du Vivant, Centre de Recherches Interdisciplinaires”, Paris, France.
Conflict of interest statement and disclosures
All the authors declare no competing interest in relation with the paper.
Outside the present work, Nicolas Deye (corresponding author) declared past lecture and travel fees from Bard and ongoing lecture and travel fees from Zoll Company.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Nicolas Deye: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Validation. Philippe Nguyen: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Validation. Nicolas Vodovar: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Validation. Malha Sadoune: Data curation, Validation. Corinne Collet: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Validation. Sebastian Voicu: Data curation, Formal
References (34)
- et al.
European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care medicine guidelines for post-resuscitation care 2015. Section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
Predictors of poor neurological outcome in adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 2: Patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia
Resuscitation
(2013) - et al.
S-100B is superior to NSE, BDNF and GFAP in predicting outcome of resuscitation from cardiac arrest with hypothermia treatment
Resuscitation
(2011) - et al.
Neuron Specific Enolase as a predictor of death or poor neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2015) - et al.
Blood ammonia and lactate levels on hospital arrival as a predictive biomarker in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2011) - et al.
Serum S100B is superior to neuron-specific enolase as an early prognostic biomarker for neurological outcome following cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Resuscitation
(2009) - et al.
Modeling serum biomarkers S100 beta and neuron-specific enolase as predictors of outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. An aid to clinical decision making
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2012) - et al.
Brain biomarkers and management of uncertainty in predicting outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nomogram paints a thousand words
Resuscitation
(2013) - et al.
Neuron specific enolase and S-100B as predictors of outcome after cardiac arrest and induced hypothermia
Resuscitation
(2009) - et al.
Predictors of poor neurological outcome in adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 1: patients not treated with therapeutic hypothermia
Resuscitation
(2013)
Modeling Serum level of S100B and Bispectral Index to predict outcome after cardiac arrest
J Am Coll Cardiol
Combining NSE and S100B with clinical examination findings to predict survival after resuscitation from cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
NSE and S-100B are not sufficiently predictive of neurologic outcome after therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
Neuron-specific enolase and S-100b in prolonged targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest: a randomised study
Resuscitation
Prognostic utility of neuroinjury biomarkers in post out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient management
Med Hypotheses
Characteristics and prognosis of sudden cardiac death in Greater Paris: population-based approach from the Paris Sudden Death Expertise Center (Paris-SDEC)
Intensive Care Med
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 1. Executive summary
Resuscitation
Cited by (11)
S100B serum level: A relevant biomarker for the management of non-traumatic headaches in emergency care?
2023, American Journal of Emergency MedicinePoisoning-related cardiac arrest: Why prognosis should be better?
2022, ResuscitationBlood biomarkers of brain injury after cardiac arrest – A dynamic field
2020, Resuscitation
- 1
These authors contributed equally to this work and are considered as 2 first co-authors.