Thermal and fluid processes in a closed-loop geothermal system using CO2 as a working fluid
Introduction
Presently, atmospheric contaminations caused by fossil combustion are becoming serious problems around the world. Therefore, new and clean energy sources must be developed. Geothermal energy is a kind of stable and sustainable energy [1,2] that is widely distributed all over the world and is universally acknowledged. Conventionally, geothermal energy is extracted from geological systems characterized by a high temperature, high permeability and large in situ water reserves (hydrothermal systems) [3,4]. However, such conditions are not common for most geothermal sites. Additionally, there are many problems in the development process of hydrothermal geothermal fields, such as reservoir blockages or a lack of abundant recharge [[5], [6], [7]]. Recently, hot dry rock (HDR) geothermal energy as a new type of geothermal resource has drawn considerable attention. HDRs are low permeability, crystalline rocks with temperatures greater than 180 °C within 3–10 km depths. The total amount of HDR energy resources in China is 25 × 106 EJ [8]. However, most HDR reservoirs have very poor permeability and almost no in situ groundwater. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) may be a feasible solution. EGS is the engineered reservoirs that have been created to extract economical amounts of heat from low permeability and/or porosity geothermal resources [9]. But the cost of EGS is extremely expensive, and reservoir engineering is difficult to control [10,11]. These problems represent great obstacles to the development of HDR geothermal resources.
During the operation of a hydrothermal geothermal system, cold water is injected into a reservoir, flowing through and heated by the pores and fractures, and then recovered from the production well or directly extract rich in-situ groundwater from the formation without any injection. Those configurations are called an open loop geothermal system (OLGS) because the working fluids have direct contact with the formation. In contrast, Closed-Loop Geothermal System (CLGS) is a relatively isolated system. The working fluid is injected into a continuously closed wellbore and circulated back to the ground in the same wellbore, without direct contact with geothermal reservoirs and in situ water [12]. The advantages of CLGS are: (1) no water circulates in the reservoir, so there is no need to consider possible water contaminants and the permeability of the reservoir; (2) there is no risk of groundwater pollution and scale deposit plugging in the reservoir; and (3) reservoir stimulation projects are not needed, and the additional costs and risks are reduced.
The CLGS design can be classified as three types: co-axial, multiple string, and U-shaped (Fig. 1) [[13], [14], [15]]. A co-axial closed-loop geothermal well is consisted of two tubes and an annulus existing between inner tube and outer tube. During co-axial CLGS running, low-temperature working fluid is injected through the outer tube from wellhead, heated by the surrounding formation in the process of descending to the well bottom, and then extracted to the ground from inner tube with a good adiabatic performance. Multiple string design is proposed by Hasan et al. [16], the bottom part of the well is full of liquid (e.g., water), while the upper portion is full of gas (e.g., nitrogen) [17]. However, However, geothermal well with multiple strings design always require a large borehole diameter because there are two tubing in the geothermal well, which is difficult to construct. Multiple string designs are usually suitable for shallow geothermal resources. U-shaped well design is the most common and classic CLGS design and it has two vertical wells, which are connected by a horizontal well. Obviously U-shaped well design has larger contact area than other well designs, which can increase the thermal efficiency. However, the cost of two vertical wells and a horizontal well is much higher than other single well design. In this study, we are focus on the co-axial closed loop geothermal system.
The heat transfer process of the OLGS includes heat conduction and convection, but CLGS only includes heat conduction around a geothermal well. Hence, the heat extraction rate of CLGS is lower than that of OLGS. In the past, there has been considerable debate about whether the heat conduction of rock can compensate for the thermal depletion around CLGS, and if the system can maintain a stable production rate for a long term [18,19]. In recent years, many scientists have carried out experiments and numerical simulations to study the CLGS with water as the working fluid. The results indicate that the insulation of the inner tube has an important effect on the performance of the system [[20], [21], [22]]. Due to the limitation of the insulation material of the inner tube, CLGS development has been halted for years. With breakthroughs in insulation materials, CLGS has been paid attention by some researcher recently. At present, many kinds of thermal insulating inner tube have been developed, including insulating coatings on the tube wall, thermal insulating tubing or other developed thermal insulating materials recently. Many relevant companies and research institutions around the world have conducted actual engineering experiments and have obtained satisfactory results [[22], [23], [24]]. In addition, there are many ways to use the low temperature geothermal water from CLGS. A typical application is geothermal heating for the building and agricultural facilities through heat exchanger [[25], [26], [27]]. This way can make full use of the hot water with a temperature of 30–60 °C.
In general, the working fluid of CLGS is water, and many investigators have studied water-based CLGS and obtained results [24,[28], [29], [30]]. However, there are still many problems during water based CLGS operations, such as the corrosion of metal wellbore, a large flow resistance and a low flow rate of the working fluid. In contrast, CO2 as the working fluid has more advantages than water in this ways. Pruess [31,32] performed fundamental numerical studies to evaluate the heat extraction performances of water and CO2. The results showed that the heat extraction rate of CO2 can be 50% higher than that of water in certain thermal conditions in a reservoir. This finding is mainly because CO2 has a larger expansibility and lower viscosity than water, which may generate large density differences between injection and production wells, provide a buoyancy force to reduce power consumption, and lead to a larger mass flow rate. Zhu et al. have studied the heat transfer of CO2 in tubes and propose a new parameter to distinguish the regimes [33]. Oldenburg et al. studied a U-shaped CLGS with supercritical CO2 (ScCO2) as the working fluid, which was considered as a more efficient working fluid than water [34,35]. Since the previous researches on the heat transfer characteristics of carbon dioxide in CLGS are all based on U-shaped geothermal wells, there are few researches on coaxial geothermal wells. Therefore, the research object of this study is determined to be coaxial geothermal wells. In this work, the physical process of flow and heat transfer in wellbore with CO2 and water as working fluid is analysed and a flow-heat transfer numerical models of CO2 and water are established respectively. The existence of reservoir around geothermal well is considered in the model. By means of numerical simulation, T2well numerical simulation program is used to carry on the wellbore-reservoir coupling numerical simulation. According to the simulation results, the mechanism of heat extraction of two kinds of fluids is analysed, and the influence of important parameters in CLGS operation is discussed. This work may also provide a theoretical reference for the selection of a heat transmission fluid in geothermal engineering.
Section snippets
Model setup
A large amount of detailed information is required to assess the feasibility of using CO2 as a heat transmission fluid at any specific site and to develop engineering designs for CO2 (ScCO2)-based closed-loop geothermal systems. In this work, we use the geological information in the Gonghe Basin, northeastern Tibetan Plateau (see Fig. 2). Gonghe Basin, where a large quantity of high-quality HDR resources has been found, is a relatively perfect area for geothermal resources explorations in
Comparison of water and CO2
For both models, we calculated the heat extraction rate by Eq. (1) according to Pruess (2006) [31],where and are the mass flow rate and specific enthalpy, respectively. The heat extraction rate and production flow rate for the two working fluids are shown in Fig. 6.
The simulation results indicate that the production temperature, flow rate and heat extraction rate decreased quickly in the first year and gradually slowed over time. The decrease of flow rate at the beginning
Sensitivity analysis
In the actual geothermal engineering, the relevant parameters of the geothermal system will be adjusted according to the actual engineering needs. In order to achieve the appropriate thermal performance, the design and operation parameters of the geothermal system are usually adjusted within a certain range. It is necessary to carry out some sensitivity analysis on these parameters. Usually these parameters include: the diameter of the inner and outer tube wellbore, the pressure difference at
Conclusions
Based on the geological conditions of Gonghe Basin in Qinghai Province of China, we carried out a wellbore–reservoir coupled numerical simulation. The following conclusions are obtained:
- (1)
In a closed-loop geothermal system, the heat extraction rate of CO2 as a working fluid is slightly higher than that of water. Under the geological conditions of the Gonghe Basin and a constant pressure operation of the geothermal system, the flow velocity of CO2 is approximately 1.3–1.5 times higher than that of
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Zixu Hu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Tianfu Xu: Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Bo Feng: Writing - review & editing, Project administration. Yilong Yuan: Resources. Fengyu Li: Investigation. Guanhong Feng: Software. Zhenjiao Jiang: Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was jointly supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFB1501802), China Jilin Province Provincial School Joint Construction Project: New energy special (Grant No. SXGJSF2017-5) and China Geological Survey Project (Grant No. DD20190127).
References (55)
- et al.
Energetic and exergetic performance comparison of different polygeneration arrangements utilizing geothermal energy in cascade
Energy Convers. Manag.
(2018) - et al.
Performance of geothermal energy extraction in a horizontal well by using CO2 as the working fluid
Energy Convers. Manag.
(2018) - et al.
Prospects of power generation from an enhanced geothermal system by water circulation through two horizontal wells: a case study in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai Province, China
Energy
(2018) - et al.
Numerical analysis of the heat production performance of a closed loop geothermal system
Renew. Energy
(2018) - et al.
Geothermal energy development by circulating CO2 in a U-shaped closed loop geothermal system
Energy Convers. Manag.
(2018) - et al.
Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells
Energy
(2018) - et al.
Numerical simulation of CO2 circulating in a retrofitted geothermal well
J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.
(2019) - et al.
A review of geothermal energy resources, development, and applications in China: current status and prospects
Energy
(2015) - et al.
A simplified model for heat extraction by circulating fluid through a closed-loop multiple-fracture enhanced geothermal system
Appl. Energy
(2016) - et al.
Optimization of energy extraction for vertical closed-loop geothermal systems considering groundwater flow
Energy Convers. Manag.
(2013)
The observed effects of changes in groundwater flow on a borehole heat exchanger of a large scale ground coupled heat pump system
Geothermics
Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) using CO 2 as working fluid—a novel approach for generating renewable energy with simultaneous sequestration of carbon
Geothermics
On production behavior of enhanced geothermal systems with CO as working fluid
Energy Convers. Manag.
Supercritical "boiling" number, a new parameter to distinguish two regimes of carbon dioxide heat transfer in tubes
Int. J. Therm. Sci.
Three-dimensional magnetotelluric imaging of the geothermal system beneath the Gonghe Basin, Northeast Tibetan plateau
Geothermics
T2Well—an integrated wellbore–reservoir simulator
Comput. Geosci.
Prospects of power generation from an enhanced geothermal system by water circulation through two horizontal wells: a case study in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai Province, China
Energy
Interpretation of production tests in geothermal wells with T2Well-EWASG
Geothermics
Impact of inner reservoir faults on migration and storage of injected CO 2
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Contr.
Modeling brine leakage to shallow aquifer through an open wellbore using T2WELL/ECO2N
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Contr.
Modelling pressure and temperature profile in a CO 2 injection well
Energy Procedia
Electricity generation using a carbon-dioxide thermosiphon
Geothermics
Analytical solution for Joule–Thomson cooling during CO geo-sequestration in depleted oil and gas reservoirs
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Contr.
Joule-Thomson cooling due to CO injection into natural gas reservoirs
Energy Convers. Manag.
Innovative closed-loop geothermal well designs using water and super critical carbon dioxide as working fluids
Assessment of energy production in the deep carbonate geothermal reservoir by wellbore-reservoir integrated fluid and heat transport modeling
Geofluids
A detailed investigation of physical and biological clogging during artificial recharge
Water Air Soil Pollut.
Cited by (39)
Review on heat extraction systems of hot dry rock: Classifications, benefits, limitations, research status and future prospects
2024, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsComparison of CO<inf>2</inf> and water as working fluids for an enhanced geothermal system in the Gonghe Basin, northwest China
2023, Gondwana ResearchCitation Excerpt :Based on these studies, the specific production feature of CO2-EGS was well revealed by using the wellbore-reservoir coupled model. Furthermore, some studies provided both insights into the U-shaped closed-loop (Hu et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2018a) and the horizontal well pattern (Shi et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2018b) geothermal system, as well as into the reservoir with complex discrete fracture networks (Guo et al., 2019; Qu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019). Feng et al. (2021) developed a multi-porosity seepage model to investigate the heat extraction performance in CO2-based geothermal systems.
A comprehensive study of the thermophysical and rheological properties of ZrO<inf>2</inf> based nanofluids as geothermal fluids
2023, Journal of Molecular Liquids